Beyond the Explicit: A Bilingual Dataset for Dehumanization Detection in Social Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18582v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 12:35:30 GMT
• Title: Beyond the Explicit: A Bilingual Dataset for Dehumanization Detection in Social Media
• Authors: Dennis Assenmacher, Paloma Piot, Katarina Laken, David Jurgens, Claudia Wagner,
• Abstract summary: Digital dehumanization remains largely overlooked within the field of computational linguistics.<n>We use crowdworkers and experts to annotate 16,000 instances on a document- and span-level.<n>This dataset serves as both a training resource for machine learning models and a benchmark for evaluating future dehumanization detection techniques.
• Score: 20.77346492661571
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Digital dehumanization, although a critical issue, remains largely overlooked within the field of computational linguistics and Natural Language Processing. The prevailing approach in current research concentrating primarily on a single aspect of dehumanization that identifies overtly negative statements as its core marker. This focus, while crucial for understanding harmful online communications, inadequately addresses the broader spectrum of dehumanization. Specifically, it overlooks the subtler forms of dehumanization that, despite not being overtly offensive, still perpetuate harmful biases against marginalized groups in online interactions. These subtler forms can insidiously reinforce negative stereotypes and biases without explicit offensiveness, making them harder to detect yet equally damaging. Recognizing this gap, we use different sampling methods to collect a theory-informed bilingual dataset from Twitter and Reddit. Using crowdworkers and experts to annotate 16,000 instances on a document- and span-level, we show that our dataset covers the different dimensions of dehumanization. This dataset serves as both a training resource for machine learning models and a benchmark for evaluating future dehumanization detection techniques. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we fine-tune ML models on this dataset, achieving performance that surpasses state-of-the-art models in zero and few-shot in-context settings.

Related papers

• HumanLLM: Towards Personalized Understanding and Simulation of Human Nature [72.55730315685837]
  HumanLLM is a foundation model designed for personalized understanding and simulation of individuals.<n>We first construct the Cognitive Genome, a large-scale corpus curated from real-world user data on platforms like Reddit, Twitter, Blogger, and Amazon.<n>We then formulate diverse learning tasks and perform supervised fine-tuning to empower the model to predict a wide range of individualized human behaviors, thoughts, and experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T09:27:27Z)
• Compositional Generalisation for Explainable Hate Speech Detection [52.41588643566991]
  Hate speech detection is key to online content moderation, but current models struggle to generalise beyond their training data.<n>We show that even when models are trained with more fine-grained, span-level annotations, they struggle to disentangle the meaning of these labels from the surrounding context.<n>We investigate whether training on a dataset where expressions occur with equal frequency across all contexts can improve generalisation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T13:07:36Z)
• Beyond Hate Speech: NLP's Challenges and Opportunities in Uncovering Dehumanizing Language [9.06965602117689]
  Dehumanization, i.e., denying human qualities to individuals or groups, is a particularly harmful form of hate speech.<n>Despite advances in NLP for detecting general hate speech, approaches to identifying dehumanizing language remain limited.<n>We systematically evaluate four state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) for dehumanization detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T13:57:36Z)
• A Dataset for the Detection of Dehumanizing Language [3.2803526084968895]
  We present two data sets of dehumanizing text, a large, automatically collected corpus and a smaller, manually annotated data set. Our methods give us a broad and varied amount of dehumanization data to work with, enabling further exploratory analysis and automatic classification of dehumanization patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:58:24Z)
• Developing Linguistic Patterns to Mitigate Inherent Human Bias in Offensive Language Detection [1.6574413179773761]
  We propose a linguistic data augmentation approach to reduce bias in labeling processes. This approach has the potential to improve offensive language classification tasks across multiple languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T10:20:36Z)
• Visual Grounding Helps Learn Word Meanings in Low-Data Regimes [47.7950860342515]
  Modern neural language models (LMs) are powerful tools for modeling human sentence production and comprehension. But to achieve these results, LMs must be trained in distinctly un-human-like ways. Do models trained more naturalistically -- with grounded supervision -- exhibit more humanlike language learning? We investigate this question in the context of word learning, a key sub-task in language acquisition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T03:33:36Z)
• Chain of Hindsight Aligns Language Models with Feedback [62.68665658130472]
  We propose a novel technique, Chain of Hindsight, that is easy to optimize and can learn from any form of feedback, regardless of its polarity. We convert all types of feedback into sequences of sentences, which are then used to fine-tune the model. By doing so, the model is trained to generate outputs based on feedback, while learning to identify and correct negative attributes or errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T10:28:16Z)
• No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation [69.28110770760506]
  We create datasets and models aimed at narrowing the performance gap between low and high-resource languages. We propose multiple architectural and training improvements to counteract overfitting while training on thousands of tasks. Our model achieves an improvement of 44% BLEU relative to the previous state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T07:33:36Z)
• Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models [107.82654101403264]
  Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) can be potentially dangerous in manifesting undesirable representational biases. We propose steps towards mitigating social biases during text generation. Our empirical results and human evaluation demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating bias while retaining crucial contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T17:52:43Z)
• A Framework for the Computational Linguistic Analysis of Dehumanization [52.735780962665814]
  We analyze discussions of LGBTQ people in the New York Times from 1986 to 2015. We find increasingly humanizing descriptions of LGBTQ people over time. The ability to analyze dehumanizing language at a large scale has implications for automatically detecting and understanding media bias as well as abusive language online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-06T03:02:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.