Mapping the AI Divide in Undergraduate Education: Community Detection in Disciplinary Networks and Survey Evidence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19288v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:46:12 GMT
• Title: Mapping the AI Divide in Undergraduate Education: Community Detection in Disciplinary Networks and Survey Evidence
• Authors: Liwen Zhang, Wei Si, Ke-ke Shang, Jiangli Zhu, Xiaomin Ji,
• Abstract summary: We map the AI divide in undergraduate education by combining network science with survey evidence from Nanjing University.<n>We identify four distinct student communities: science dominant, science peripheral, social sciences & science, and humanities and social sciences.<n>Our findings demonstrate that curriculum structure and cross-disciplinary integration are key determinants of technological fluency.
• Score: 5.522479128869082
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) reshapes knowledge acquisition, higher education faces growing inequities that demand systematic mapping and intervention. We map the AI divide in undergraduate education by combining network science with survey evidence from 301 students at Nanjing University, one of China's leading institutions in AI education. Drawing on course enrolment patterns to construct a disciplinary network, we identify four distinct student communities: science dominant, science peripheral, social sciences & science, and humanities and social sciences. Survey results reveal significant disparities in AIGC literacy and motivational efficacy, with science dominant students outperforming humanities and social sciences peers. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression shows that motivational efficacy--particularly skill efficacy--partially mediates this gap, whereas usage efficacy does not mediate at the evaluation level, indicating a dissociation between perceived utility and critical engagement. Our findings demonstrate that curriculum structure and cross-disciplinary integration are key determinants of technological fluency. This work provides a scalable framework for diagnosing and addressing the AI divide through institutional design.

Related papers

• AI Combines, Humans Socialise: A SECI-based Experience Report on Business Simulation Games [0.0]
  This paper reports on the integration of generative AI tools into a Business Simulation Games (BSG) designed for engineering students.<n> AI was embedded as a support mechanism during the simulation to assist students in analysing events, reformulating information, and generating decision-relevant insights.<n>The results suggest a functional boundary in human-AI collaboration within simulation-based learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T07:26:16Z)
• AI4X Roadmap: Artificial Intelligence for the advancement of scientific pursuit and its future directions [65.44445343399126]
  We look at AI-enabled science across biology, chemistry, climate science, mathematics, materials science, physics, self-driving laboratories and unconventional computing.<n>Several shared themes emerge: the need for diverse and trustworthy data, transferable electronic-structure and interatomic models, AI systems integrated into end-to-end scientific synthesis.<n>Across domains, we highlight how large foundation models, active learning and self-driving laboratories can close loops between prediction and validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T02:10:28Z)
• Report on the Scoping Workshop on AI in Science Education Research 2025 [2.0613397238713778]
  Report summarizes the outcomes of a two-day international scoping workshop on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in science education research.<n>As AI rapidly reshapes scientific practice, classroom learning, and research methods, the field faces both new opportunities and significant challenges.<n>Report concludes with actionable recommendations for training, infrastructure, and standards, along with guidance for funders, policymakers, professional organizations, and academic departments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T10:23:22Z)
• From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery [108.1082357960201]
  Agentic AI shows capabilities in hypothesis generation, experimental design, execution, analysis, and iterative refinement.<n>This survey provides a domain-oriented review of autonomous scientific discovery across life sciences, chemistry, materials science, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T05:25:54Z)
• AI Literacy as a Key Driver of User Experience in AI-Powered Assessment: Insights from Socratic Mind [2.0272430076690027]
  This study examines how students' AI literacy and prior exposure to AI technologies shape their perceptions of Socratic Mind.<n>Data from 309 undergraduates in Computer Science and Business courses were collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T10:11:24Z)
• Distinguishing Fact from Fiction: Student Traits, Attitudes, and AI Hallucination Detection in Business School Assessment [2.3359837623080613]
  We examine how academic skills, cognitive traits, and AI scepticism influence students' ability to detect factually incorrect AI-generated responses (hallucinations) in a high-stakes assessment at a UK business school.<n>We find that only 20% successfully identified the hallucination, with strong academic performance, interpretive skills thinking, writing proficiency, and AI scepticism emerging as key predictors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T18:39:57Z)
• Advancing Education through Tutoring Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [3.276010440333338]
  This study systematically reviews the transformative role of Tutoring Systems, encompassing Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) and Robot Tutoring Systems (RTS)<n>The findings reveal significant advancements in AI techniques that enhance adaptability, engagement, and learning outcomes.<n>The study highlights the complementary strengths of ITS and RTS, proposing integrated hybrid solutions to maximize educational benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T18:47:07Z)
• The Role of AI, Blockchain, Cloud, and Data (ABCD) in Enhancing Learning Assessments of College Students [0.0]
  This study investigates how ABCD technologies can improve learning assessments in higher education.<n>The objective is to research how students perceive things, plan their behavior, and how ABCD technologies affect individual learning, academic integrity, co-learning, and trust in the assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T15:11:44Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Perceptions of Discriminatory Decisions of Artificial Intelligence: Unpacking the Role of Individual Characteristics [0.0]
  Personal differences (digital self-efficacy, technical knowledge, belief in equality, political ideology) are associated with perceptions of AI outcomes. Digital self-efficacy and technical knowledge are positively associated with attitudes toward AI. Liberal ideologies are negatively associated with outcome trust, higher negative emotion, and greater skepticism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T06:18:26Z)
• Bringing Generative AI to Adaptive Learning in Education [58.690250000579496]
  We shed light on the intersectional studies of generative AI and adaptive learning. We argue that this union will contribute significantly to the development of the next-stage learning format in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T23:54:51Z)
• AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
  Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities. The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z)
• Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
  We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.