Multi-Task Deep Learning for Surface Metrology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20339v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 08:38:18 GMT
• Title: Multi-Task Deep Learning for Surface Metrology
• Authors: D. Kucharski, A. Gaska, T. Kowaluk, K. Stepien, M. Repalska, B. Gapinski, M. Wieczorowski, M. Nawotka, P. Sobecki, P. Sosinowski, J. Tomasik, A. Wojtowicz,
• Abstract summary: A reproducible deep learning framework is presented for surface metrology to predict surface texture parameters.<n>Uncertainty is modelled via quantile and heteroscedastic heads with post-hoc conformal calibration to yield calibrated intervals.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A reproducible deep learning framework is presented for surface metrology to predict surface texture parameters together with their reported standard uncertainties. Using a multi-instrument dataset spanning tactile and optical systems, measurement system type classification is addressed alongside coordinated regression of Ra, Rz, RONt and their uncertainty targets (Ra_uncert, Rz_uncert, RONt_uncert). Uncertainty is modelled via quantile and heteroscedastic heads with post-hoc conformal calibration to yield calibrated intervals. On a held-out set, high fidelity was achieved by single-target regressors (R2: Ra 0.9824, Rz 0.9847, RONt 0.9918), with two uncertainty targets also well modelled (Ra_uncert 0.9899, Rz_uncert 0.9955); RONt_uncert remained difficult (R2 0.4934). The classifier reached 92.85% accuracy and probability calibration was essentially unchanged after temperature scaling (ECE 0.00504 -> 0.00503 on the test split). Negative transfer was observed for naive multi-output trunks, with single-target models performing better. These results provide calibrated predictions suitable to inform instrument selection and acceptance decisions in metrological workflows.

Related papers

• Exact Discrete Stochastic Simulation with Deep-Learning-Scale Gradient Optimization [0.0]
  Exact simulation of continuous-time Markov chains (CTMCs) is essential when discreteness and noise drive system behavior, but the hard categorical event selection in Gillespie-type algorithms blocks gradient-based learning.<n>We eliminate this constraint by decoupling forward simulation from backward differentiation, with hard categorical sampling generating exact trajectories and gradients propagating through a continuous massively-parallel Gumbel-Softmax straight-through surrogate.<n>Our results enable high-dimensional parameter inference and inverse design across systems biology, chemical kinetics, physics, and related CTMC-governed domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T12:29:43Z)
• Geometric Calibration and Neutral Zones for Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Class Classification [0.0]
  This work bridges information geometry and statistical learning, offering formal guarantees for uncertainty-aware classification in applications requiring rigorous validation.<n> Empirical validation on Adeno-Associated Virus classification demonstrates that the two-stage framework captures 72.5% of errors while deferring 34.5% of samples, reducing automated decision error rates from 16.8% to 6.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T01:29:49Z)
• Handling Extreme Class Imbalance: Using GANs in Data Augmentation for Suicide Prediction [0.0]
  Real data with sufficient positive samples is rare and causes extreme class imbalance.<n>We utilized machine learning (ML) to build the model and deep learning (DL) techniques, like Geneversarative Adrial Networks (GAN)<n>GAN played a key role in generating synthetic data to support suicide prevention modeling efforts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T15:35:39Z)
• Generalizable Diabetes Risk Stratification via Hybrid Machine Learning Models [0.0]
  Diabetes affects over 537 million people worldwide and is projected to reach 783 million by 2045.<n>We compare two hybrid classifiers and assess their generalizability on an external cohort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T21:18:52Z)
• Enhanced Predictive Modeling for Hazardous Near-Earth Object Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Resampling Strategies and Machine Learning Algorithms in Planetary Risk Assessment [0.0]
  This study evaluates the performance of several machine learning models for predicting hazardous near-Earth objects (NEOs) through a binary classification framework.<n> RFC and GBC performed the best, both with an impressive F2-score of 0.987 and 0.896, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T22:50:00Z)
• Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Recurrence Classification Using Machine Learning Models and Bayesian Neural Networks with Varying Priors: A SHAP-Based Interpretation of the Best Performing Model [0.0]
  Differentiated thyroid cancer DTC recurrence is a major public health concern.<n>This study introduces a comprehensive framework for DTC recurrence classification using a dataset containing 383 patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T06:31:31Z)
• On the good reliability of an interval-based metric to validate prediction uncertainty for machine learning regression tasks [0.0]
  This study presents an opportunistic approach to a (more) reliable validation method for prediction uncertainty average calibration. Considering that variance-based calibration metrics are quite sensitive to the presence of heavy tails in the uncertainty and error distributions, a shift is proposed to an interval-based metric, the Prediction Interval Coverage Probability (PICP) The resulting PICPs are more quickly and reliably tested than variance-based calibration metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T14:16:10Z)
• Instant Uncertainty Calibration of NeRFs Using a Meta-calibrator [60.47106421809998]
  We introduce the concept of a meta-calibrator that performs uncertainty calibration for NeRFs with a single forward pass. We show that the meta-calibrator can generalize on unseen scenes and achieves well-calibrated and state-of-the-art uncertainty for NeRFs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T21:29:31Z)
• Sample-dependent Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Improved Calibration [95.7477042886242]
  Post-hoc approach to compensate for neural networks being wrong is to perform temperature scaling. We propose to predict a different temperature value for each input, allowing us to adjust the mismatch between confidence and accuracy. We test our method on the ResNet50 and WideResNet28-10 architectures using the CIFAR10/100 and Tiny-ImageNet datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T14:13:49Z)
• ADT-SSL: Adaptive Dual-Threshold for Semi-Supervised Learning [68.53717108812297]
  Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) has advanced classification tasks by inputting both labeled and unlabeled data to train a model jointly. This paper proposes an Adaptive Dual-Threshold method for Semi-Supervised Learning (ADT-SSL) Experimental results show that the proposed ADT-SSL achieves state-of-the-art classification accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T11:52:08Z)
• Data Dependent Randomized Smoothing [127.34833801660233]
  We show that our data dependent framework can be seamlessly incorporated into 3 randomized smoothing approaches. We get 9% and 6% improvement over the certified accuracy of the strongest baseline for a radius of 0.5 on CIFAR10 and ImageNet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T10:53:11Z)
• Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately [83.68135652247496]
  A natural remedy is to remove spurious features from the model. We show that removal of spurious features can decrease accuracy due to inductive biases. We also show that robust self-training can remove spurious features without affecting the overall accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T23:08:59Z)
• Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean Discrepancy [45.45024203912822]
  Modern deep neural networks still produce unreliable predictive uncertainty. In this paper, we are concerned with getting well-calibrated predictions in regression tasks. Experiments on non-trivial real datasets show that our method can produce well-calibrated and sharp prediction intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T03:38:12Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.