Risk Psychology & Cyber-Attack Tactics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20657v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:31:47 GMT
• Title: Risk Psychology & Cyber-Attack Tactics
• Abstract summary: We employ mixed-effects Poisson regression to test whether cognitive processes predicted technique-specific usage.<n>The scales significantly predicted technique use, but effects varied by technique rather than operating uniformly.
• Score: 1.4564152675524673
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We examine whether measured cognitive processes predict cyber-attack behavior. We analyzed data that included psychometric scale responses and labeled attack behaviors from cybersecurity professionals who conducted red-team operations against a simulated enterprise network. We employed multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression with technique counts nested within participants to test whether cognitive processes predicted technique-specific usage. The scales significantly predicted technique use, but effects varied by technique rather than operating uniformly. Neither expertise level nor experimental treatment condition significantly predicted technique patterns, indicating that cognitive processes may be stronger drivers of technique selection than training or experience. These findings demonstrate that individual cognitive differences shape cyber-attack behavior and support the development of psychology-informed defense strategies.

Related papers

• AI in Cyberpsychology: A systematic literature review of Cybersecurity enhancement by using AI for analyzing psychology of Victims, Attackers, and Defenders [0.6524460254566904]
  Cyberpsychology (CPSY) is defined as the use of psychology to enhance cybersecurity applications.<n>The review presents a comprehensive taxonomy of the cyber-security applications, the AI methodologies used, and the psychological concepts employed across the studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T17:18:30Z)
• Profiling User Vulnerability to Phishing Through Psychological and Behavioral Factors [0.7231477812426922]
  This study investigates the multidimensional nature of user susceptibility by analyzing data from the Spamley dataset.<n>Using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), five latent constructs were identified, named: Seniority, Expertise, Creativity, Stability, and Vulnerability.<n>Results suggest that the majority of users fall into the High-Risk category, characterized by hasty evaluation processes and lower critical analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T14:35:00Z)
• A Descriptive Model for Modelling Attacker Decision-Making in Cyber-Deception [0.0]
  This paper presents a descriptive model that incorporates the psychological and strategic elements shaping this decision.<n>The framework provides a structured method for analysing engagement decisions in cyber-deception scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T10:23:33Z)
• Quantifying the Engagement Effectiveness of Cyber Cognitive Attacks: A Behavioral Metric for Disinformation Campaigns [3.7735437117876267]
  This paper presents a novel framework for measuring the engagement effectiveness of cognitive attacks by introducing a weighted interaction metric.<n>Applying this model to real-world disinformation campaigns across social media platforms, we demonstrate how the metric captures not just reach but the behavioral depth of user engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T16:34:46Z)
• Towards Proactive Defense Against Cyber Cognitive Attacks [3.357544650969485]
  Cyber cognitive attacks leverage disruptive innovations (DIs) to exploit psychological biases and manipulate decision-making processes.<n>New technologies, such as AI-driven disinformation and synthetic media, have accelerated the scale and sophistication of these threats.<n>We introduce a novel predictive methodology for forecasting the emergence of DIs and their malicious uses in cognitive attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T16:25:47Z)
• Behavioral Exploration: Learning to Explore via In-Context Adaptation [53.92981562916783]
  We train a long-context generative model to predict expert actions conditioned on a context of past observations and a measure of how exploratory'' the expert's behaviors are relative to this context.<n>This enables the model to not only mimic the behavior of an expert, but also, by feeding its past history of interactions into its context, to select different expert behaviors than what have been previously selected.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in both simulated locomotion and manipulation settings, as well as on real-world robotic manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T21:36:19Z)
• Sequence models for by-trial decoding of cognitive strategies from neural data [0.0]
  We introduce a novel machine learning method to decode cognitive strategies from electroencephalography data at the trial level.<n>By successfully modeling cognitive operations at the trial level, we provide empirical evidence for dynamic variability in decision strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T09:33:02Z)
• Investigating Human-Identifiable Features Hidden in Adversarial Perturbations [54.39726653562144]
  Our study explores up to five attack algorithms across three datasets. We identify human-identifiable features in adversarial perturbations. Using pixel-level annotations, we extract such features and demonstrate their ability to compromise target models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T22:31:29Z)
• The world seems different in a social context: a neural network analysis of human experimental data [57.729312306803955]
  We show that it is possible to replicate human behavioral data in both individual and social task settings by modifying the precision of prior and sensory signals. An analysis of the neural activation traces of the trained networks provides evidence that information is coded in fundamentally different ways in the network in the individual and in the social conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T17:19:12Z)
• Identification of Attack-Specific Signatures in Adversarial Examples [62.17639067715379]
  We show that different attack algorithms produce adversarial examples which are distinct not only in their effectiveness but also in how they qualitatively affect their victims. Our findings suggest that prospective adversarial attacks should be compared not only via their success rates at fooling models but also via deeper downstream effects they have on victims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T15:40:48Z)
• Adversarial Training is Not Ready for Robot Learning [55.493354071227174]
  Adversarial training is an effective method to train deep learning models that are resilient to norm-bounded perturbations. We show theoretically and experimentally that neural controllers obtained via adversarial training are subjected to three types of defects. Our results suggest that adversarial training is not yet ready for robot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T07:51:31Z)
• A Deep Genetic Programming based Methodology for Art Media Classification Robust to Adversarial Perturbations [1.6148039130053087]
  Art Media Classification problem is a current research area that has attracted attention due to the complex extraction and analysis of features of high-value art pieces. A major concern related to its reliability has brought attention because, with small perturbations made intentionally in the input image (adversarial attack), its prediction can be completely changed. This work presents a Deep Genetic Programming method, called Brain Programming, that competes with deep learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-03T00:36:34Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.