The Order of Recommendation Matters: Structured Exploration for Improving the Fairness of Content Creators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20698v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:13:24 GMT
• Title: The Order of Recommendation Matters: Structured Exploration for Improving the Fairness of Content Creators
• Authors: Salima Jaoua, Nicolò Pagan, Anikó Hannák, Stefania Ionescu,
• Abstract summary: We find interventions that improve fairness for content creators on social media platforms.<n>The use of ordered pairwise comparison overcomes the cold start problem for a new set of items.<n>Experiments reveal that the intervention improves fairness when deployed at early stages of the platform, but the effect decreases as the strength of pre-existing bias increases.
• Score: 0.6999740786886536
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social media platforms provide millions of professional content creators with sustainable incomes. Their income is largely influenced by their number of views and followers, which in turn depends on the platform's recommender system (RS). So, as with regular jobs, it is important to ensure that RSs distribute revenue in a fair way. For example, prior work analyzed whether the creators of the highest-quality content would receive the most followers and income. Results showed this is unlikely to be the case, but did not suggest targeted solutions. In this work, we first use theoretical analysis and simulations on synthetic datasets to understand the system better and find interventions that improve fairness for creators. We find that the use of ordered pairwise comparison overcomes the cold start problem for a new set of items and greatly increases the chance of achieving fair outcomes for all content creators. Importantly, it also maintains user satisfaction. We also test the intervention on the MovieLens dataset and investigate its effectiveness on platforms with interaction histories that are currently unfair for content creators. These experiments reveal that the intervention improves fairness when deployed at early stages of the platform, but the effect decreases as the strength of pre-existing bias increases. Altogether, we find that the ordered pairwise comparison approach might offer a plausible alternative for both new and existing platforms to implement.

Related papers

• Fairness Dynamics in Digital Economy Platforms with Biased Ratings [50.29721091981893]
  We study how digital platforms can perpetuate or counteract rating-based discrimination.<n>Our results demonstrate a fundamental trade-off between user experience and fairness.<n>Our results also provide evidence that intervening by tuning the demographics of the search results is a highly effective way of reducing unfairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T18:41:16Z)
• Beyond Exposure: Optimizing Ranking Fairness with Non-linear Time-Income Functions [27.771995549036813]
  We study ranking fairness when the provider utility is influenced by other contextual factors and is neither equal to nor proportional to item exposure.<n>We propose the Dynamic-Income-Derivative-aware Ranking Fairness algorithm, which uses Taylor-expansion-based gradients to simultaneously optimize effectiveness and income fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T10:11:24Z)
• Unveiling User Satisfaction and Creator Productivity Trade-Offs in Recommendation Platforms [68.51708490104687]
  We show that a purely relevance-driven policy with low exploration strength boosts short-term user satisfaction but undermines the long-term richness of the content pool. Our findings reveal a fundamental trade-off between immediate user satisfaction and overall content production on platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T07:19:22Z)
• User Welfare Optimization in Recommender Systems with Competing Content Creators [65.25721571688369]
  In this study, we perform system-side user welfare optimization under a competitive game setting among content creators. We propose an algorithmic solution for the platform, which dynamically computes a sequence of weights for each user based on their satisfaction of the recommended content. These weights are then utilized to design mechanisms that adjust the recommendation policy or the post-recommendation rewards, thereby influencing creators' content production strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T21:09:52Z)
• Interpolating Item and User Fairness in Multi-Sided Recommendations [13.635310806431198]
  We introduce a novel fair recommendation framework, Problem (FAIR) We propose a low-regret algorithm FORM that concurrently performs real-time learning and fair recommendations, two tasks that are often at odds. We demonstrate the efficacy of our framework and method in maintaining platform revenue while ensuring desired levels of fairness for both items and users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T15:00:58Z)
• Online Learning in a Creator Economy [91.55437924091844]
  We study the creator economy as a three-party game between the users, platform, and content creators. We analyze two families of contracts: return-based contracts and feature-based contracts. We show that under smoothness assumptions, the joint optimization of return-based contracts and recommendation policy provides a regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T01:58:13Z)
• How Bad is Top-$K$ Recommendation under Competing Content Creators? [43.2268992294178]
  We study the user welfare guarantee through the lens of Price of Anarchy. We show that the fraction of user welfare loss due to creator competition is always upper bounded by a small constant depending on $K$ and randomness in user decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T19:37:35Z)
• D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias [57.87117733071416]
  We propose D-BIAS, a visual interactive tool that embodies human-in-the-loop AI approach for auditing and mitigating social biases. A user can detect the presence of bias against a group by identifying unfair causal relationships in the causal network. For each interaction, say weakening/deleting a biased causal edge, the system uses a novel method to simulate a new (debiased) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T03:41:48Z)
• Modeling Content Creator Incentives on Algorithm-Curated Platforms [76.53541575455978]
  We study how algorithmic choices affect the existence and character of (Nash) equilibria in exposure games. We propose tools for numerically finding equilibria in exposure games, and illustrate results of an audit on the MovieLens and LastFM datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T08:16:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.