TOM-SWE: User Mental Modeling For Software Engineering Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21903v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 16:09:51 GMT
• Title: TOM-SWE: User Mental Modeling For Software Engineering Agents
• Authors: Xuhui Zhou, Valerie Chen, Zora Zhiruo Wang, Graham Neubig, Maarten Sap, Xingyao Wang,
• Abstract summary: ToM-SWE is a dual-agent architecture that pairs a primary software-engineering (SWE) agent with a lightweight theory-of-mind (ToM) partner agent.<n>ToM-SWE infers user goals, constraints, and preferences from instructions and interaction history.<n>In two software engineering benchmarks, ToM-SWE improves task success rates and user satisfaction.
• Score: 75.28749912645127
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in coding agents have made them capable of planning, editing, running, and testing complex code bases. Despite their growing ability in coding tasks, these systems still struggle to infer and track user intent, especially when instructions are underspecified or context-dependent. To bridge this gap, we introduce ToM-SWE, a dual-agent architecture that pairs a primary software-engineering (SWE) agent with a lightweight theory-of-mind (ToM) partner agent dedicated to modeling the user's mental state. The ToM agent infers user goals, constraints, and preferences from instructions and interaction history, maintains a \textbf{persistent memory} of the user, and provides user-related suggestions to the SWE agent. In two software engineering benchmarks (ambiguous SWE-bench and stateful SWE-bench), ToM-SWE improves task success rates and user satisfaction. Notably, on the stateful SWE benchmark, a newly introduced evaluation that provides agents with a user simulator along with previous interaction histories, ToM-SWE achieves a substantially higher task success rate of 59.7\% compared to 18.1\% for OpenHands, a state-of-the-art SWE agent. Furthermore, in a three-week study with professional developers using ToM-SWE in their daily work, participants found it useful 86\% of the time, underscoring the value of stateful user modeling for practical coding agents.

Related papers

• AgentStepper: Interactive Debugging of Software Development Agents [14.265317773238529]
  We introduce AgentStepper, the first interactive debugger for software engineering agents.<n>AgentStepper represents trajectories as structured conversations among an LLM, the agent program, and tools.<n>It supports breakpoints, stepwise execution, and live editing of prompts and tool invocations, while capturing and displaying intermediate repository-level code changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T10:44:09Z)
• How can we assess human-agent interactions? Case studies in software agent design [52.953425368394306]
  We make two major steps towards the rigorous assessment of human-agent interactions.<n>We propose PULSE, a framework for more efficient human-centric evaluation of agent designs.<n>We deploy the framework on a large-scale web platform built around the open-source software agent OpenHands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T19:04:28Z)
• Visual Document Understanding and Question Answering: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework with Test-Time Scaling [83.78874399606379]
  We propose MACT, a Multi-Agent Collaboration framework with Test-Time scaling.<n>It comprises four distinct small-scale agents, with clearly defined roles and effective collaboration.<n>It shows superior performance with a smaller parameter scale without sacrificing the ability of general and mathematical tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T12:52:09Z)
• PersonaAgent: When Large Language Model Agents Meet Personalization at Test Time [87.99027488664282]
  PersonaAgent is a framework designed to address versatile personalization tasks.<n>It integrates a personalized memory module and a personalized action module.<n>Test-time user-preference alignment strategy ensures real-time user preference alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T17:29:49Z)
• Agent S2: A Compositional Generalist-Specialist Framework for Computer Use Agents [30.253353551910404]
  Computer use agents automate digital tasks by directly interacting with graphical user interfaces (GUIs) on computers and mobile devices.<n>We introduce Agent S2, a novel compositional framework that delegates cognitive responsibilities across various generalist and specialist models.<n>Agent S2 establishes new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on three prominent computer use benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T15:40:27Z)
• Boosting Virtual Agent Learning and Reasoning: A Step-Wise, Multi-Dimensional, and Generalist Reward Model with Benchmark [72.46357004059661]
  Generalist Virtual Agents (GVAs) have shown significant promise in autonomous task execution.<n>To address these challenges, we propose Similar, a Step-Wise Multi-Dimensional Generalist Reward Model.<n>Similar offers fine-grained signals for agent training and can choose better action for inference-time scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T13:30:47Z)
• Agent S: An Open Agentic Framework that Uses Computers Like a Human [31.16046798529319]
  We present Agent S, an open agentic framework that enables autonomous interaction with computers through a Graphical User Interface (GUI) Agent S aims to address three key challenges in automating computer tasks: acquiring domain-specific knowledge, planning over long task horizons, and handling dynamic, non-uniform interfaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:43:51Z)
• SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering [79.07755560048388]
  SWE-agent is a system that facilitates LM agents to autonomously use computers to solve software engineering tasks. SWE-agent's custom agent-computer interface (ACI) significantly enhances an agent's ability to create and edit code files, navigate entire repositories, and execute tests and other programs. We evaluate SWE-agent on SWE-bench and HumanEvalFix, achieving state-of-the-art performance on both with a pass@1 rate of 12.5% and 87.7%, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T17:41:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.