Visual Document Understanding and Question Answering: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework with Test-Time Scaling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03404v1
• Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 12:52:09 GMT
• Title: Visual Document Understanding and Question Answering: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework with Test-Time Scaling
• Authors: Xinlei Yu, Zhangquan Chen, Yudong Zhang, Shilin Lu, Ruolin Shen, Jiangning Zhang, Xiaobin Hu, Yanwei Fu, Shuicheng Yan,
• Abstract summary: We propose MACT, a Multi-Agent Collaboration framework with Test-Time scaling.<n>It comprises four distinct small-scale agents, with clearly defined roles and effective collaboration.<n>It shows superior performance with a smaller parameter scale without sacrificing the ability of general and mathematical tasks.
• Score: 83.78874399606379
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Existing vision-language models (VLMs), whether generalists or specialists, remain constrained by their parameter scale, lack robust self-correction capabilities, and underperform in tasks involving long visual contexts and complex reasoning, resulting in suboptimal performance on document-based tasks. To address this, we propose MACT, a Multi-Agent Collaboration framework with Test-Time scaling, tailored for visual document understanding and visual question answering (VQA). It comprises four distinct small-scale agents, i.e., planning, execution, judgment, and answer agents, with clearly defined roles and effective collaboration. Notably, the judgment agent exclusively verifies correctness and redirects to prior agents for revisions, outperforming conventional correction strategies. To further expand the capability boundaries of the framework, we propose mixed reward modeling that balances agent-specific abilities and global collaboration, as well as agent-wise hybrid test-time scaling, which customizes different scaling strategies for each agent based on their functions. Evaluated on benchmarks spanning both document-based and non-document-based settings, our MACT shows superior performance with a smaller parameter scale without sacrificing the ability of general and mathematical tasks. Especially, it stands out in benchmarks involving long visual contexts and complicated reasoning. The three variants of MACT consistently hold the top three positions in average scores, leading in 13 of the 15 benchmarks. Code will be available at: https://github.com/YU-deep/MACT.git.

Related papers

• CodeAgents: A Token-Efficient Framework for Codified Multi-Agent Reasoning in LLMs [16.234259194402163]
  We introduce CodeAgents, a prompting framework that codifies multi-agent reasoning and enables structured, token-efficient planning in multi-agent systems.<n>Results show consistent improvements in planning performance, with absolute gains of 3-36 percentage points over natural language prompting baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T02:20:19Z)
• What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent Capabilities [56.646832992178105]
  We introduce OmniBench, a cross-platform, graph-based benchmark with an automated pipeline for synthesizing tasks of controllable complexity.<n>We present OmniEval, a multidimensional evaluation framework that includes subtask-level evaluation, graph-based metrics, and comprehensive tests across 10 capabilities.<n>Our dataset contains 36k graph-structured tasks across 20 scenarios, achieving a 91% human acceptance rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T15:59:38Z)
• AgentSwift: Efficient LLM Agent Design via Value-guided Hierarchical Search [58.98450205734779]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Existing agent search methods suffer from three major limitations.<n>We introduce a comprehensive framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T12:07:23Z)
• Agent-X: Evaluating Deep Multimodal Reasoning in Vision-Centric Agentic Tasks [94.19506319646376]
  We introduce Agent-X, a benchmark for evaluating vision-centric agents in real-world, multimodal settings.<n>Agent-X features 828 agentic tasks with authentic visual contexts, including images, multi-image comparisons, videos, and instructional text.<n>Our results reveal that even the best-performing models, including GPT, Gemini, and Qwen families, struggle to solve multi-step vision tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T17:59:53Z)
• HALO: Hierarchical Autonomous Logic-Oriented Orchestration for Multi-Agent LLM Systems [1.1930434318557155]
  We introduce HALO, a multi-agent collaboration framework based on a hierarchical reasoning architecture.<n>Specifically, we incorporate a high-level planning agent for task decomposition, mid-level role-design agents for subtask-specific agent instantiation, and low-level inference agents for subtask execution.<n>As the majority of users lack expertise in prompt engineering, we leverage an Adaptive Prompt Refinement module to transform raw queries into task-specific prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T04:14:03Z)
• MDocAgent: A Multi-Modal Multi-Agent Framework for Document Understanding [40.52017994491893]
  MDocAgent is a novel RAG and multi-agent framework that leverages both text and image.<n>Our system employs five specialized agents: a general agent, a critical agent, a text agent, an image agent and a summarizing agent.<n>Preliminary experiments on five benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our MDocAgent, achieve an average improvement of 12.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T06:57:21Z)
• MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents [59.825725526176655]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents.<n>Existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition.<n>We introduce MultiAgentBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T05:18:50Z)
• Multi2: Multi-Agent Test-Time Scalable Framework for Multi-Document Processing [43.75154489681047]
  We propose a novel framework leveraging test-time scaling for Multi-Document Summarization (MDS)<n>Our approach employs prompt ensemble techniques to generate multiple candidate summaries using various prompts, then combines them with an aggregator to produce a refined summary.<n>To evaluate our method effectively, we also introduce two new LLM-based metrics: the Consistency-Aware Preference (CAP) score and LLM Atom-Content-Unit (LLM-ACU) score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T23:34:47Z)
• MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains [54.117238759317004]
  Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark features comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups. It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T00:58:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.