HACK: Hallucinations Along Certainty and Knowledge Axes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24222v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:34:31 GMT
• Title: HACK: Hallucinations Along Certainty and Knowledge Axes
• Authors: Adi Simhi, Jonathan Herzig, Itay Itzhak, Dana Arad, Zorik Gekhman, Roi Reichart, Fazl Barez, Gabriel Stanovsky, Idan Szpektor, Yonatan Belinkov,
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework for categorizing hallucinations along two axes: knowledge and certainty.<n>We identify a particularly concerning subset of hallucinations where models hallucinate with certainty despite having the correct knowledge internally.
• Score: 66.66625343090743
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Hallucinations in LLMs present a critical barrier to their reliable usage. Existing research usually categorizes hallucination by their external properties rather than by the LLMs' underlying internal properties. This external focus overlooks that hallucinations may require tailored mitigation strategies based on their underlying mechanism. We propose a framework for categorizing hallucinations along two axes: knowledge and certainty. Since parametric knowledge and certainty may vary across models, our categorization method involves a model-specific dataset construction process that differentiates between those types of hallucinations. Along the knowledge axis, we distinguish between hallucinations caused by a lack of knowledge and those occurring despite the model having the knowledge of the correct response. To validate our framework along the knowledge axis, we apply steering mitigation, which relies on the existence of parametric knowledge to manipulate model activations. This addresses the lack of existing methods to validate knowledge categorization by showing a significant difference between the two hallucination types. We further analyze the distinct knowledge and hallucination patterns between models, showing that different hallucinations do occur despite shared parametric knowledge. Turning to the certainty axis, we identify a particularly concerning subset of hallucinations where models hallucinate with certainty despite having the correct knowledge internally. We introduce a new evaluation metric to measure the effectiveness of mitigation methods on this subset, revealing that while some methods perform well on average, they fail disproportionately on these critical cases. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both knowledge and certainty in hallucination analysis and call for targeted mitigation approaches that consider the hallucination underlying factors.

Related papers

• Understanding New-Knowledge-Induced Factual Hallucinations in LLMs: Analysis, Solution, and Interpretation [41.83870063693278]
  Previous studies show that introducing new knowledge during large language models (LLMs) fine-tuning can lead to the generation of erroneous output when tested on known information.<n>We conduct a fine-grained analysis across multiple knowledge types and two task types, including knowledge question answering (QA) and knowledge reasoning tasks.<n>We find that when fine-tuned on a dataset in which a specific knowledge type consists entirely of new knowledge, LLMs exhibit significantly increased hallucinations tendencies.<n>We propose KnownPatch, which patches a small number of known knowledge samples in the later stages of training, effectively alleviating new-knowledge-induced hallucinations
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T14:55:24Z)
• Theoretical Foundations and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs) refers to the generation of content that is not faithful to the input or the real-world facts.<n>This paper provides a rigorous treatment of hallucination in LLMs, including formal definitions and theoretical analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-20T15:22:34Z)
• HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmark [49.170128733508335]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate responses that deviate from user input or training data, a phenomenon known as "hallucination"<n>This paper introduces a comprehensive hallucination benchmark, incorporating both new extrinsic and existing intrinsic evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T13:40:27Z)
• Why and How LLMs Hallucinate: Connecting the Dots with Subsequence Associations [82.42811602081692]
  This paper introduces a subsequence association framework to systematically trace and understand hallucinations.<n>Key insight is hallucinations that arise when dominant hallucinatory associations outweigh faithful ones.<n>We propose a tracing algorithm that identifies causal subsequences by analyzing hallucination probabilities across randomized input contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T06:34:45Z)
• Trust Me, I'm Wrong: LLMs Hallucinate with Certainty Despite Knowing the Answer [51.7407540261676]
  We investigate a distinct type of hallucination, where a model can consistently answer a question correctly, but a seemingly trivial perturbation causes it to produce a hallucinated response with high certainty.<n>This phenomenon is particularly concerning in high-stakes domains such as medicine or law, where model certainty is often used as a proxy for reliability.<n>We show that CHOKE examples are consistent across prompts, occur in different models and datasets, and are fundamentally distinct from other hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:46:31Z)
• HalluEntity: Benchmarking and Understanding Entity-Level Hallucination Detection [16.27352940098609]
  We propose a new data set, HalluEntity, which annotates hallucination at the entity level.<n>Based on the dataset, we evaluate uncertainty-based hallucination detection approaches across 17 modern LLMs.<n>Our experimental results show that uncertainty estimation approaches focusing on individual token probabilities tend to over-predict hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T16:01:41Z)
• Hallucination Detection: A Probabilistic Framework Using Embeddings Distance Analysis [2.089191490381739]
  We introduce a mathematically sound methodology to reason about hallucination, and leverage it to build a tool to detect hallucinations.<n>To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to show that hallucinated content has structural differences with respect to correct content.<n>We leverage these structural differences to develop a tool to detect hallucinated responses, achieving an accuracy of 66% for a specific configuration of system parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T09:44:13Z)
• Distinguishing Ignorance from Error in LLM Hallucinations [43.62904897907926]
  We distinguish between two types of hallucinations: ones where the model does not hold the correct answer in its parameters, which we term HK-, and ones where the model answers incorrectly despite having the required knowledge, termed HK+.<n>We show that different models hallucinate on different examples, which motivates constructing model-specific hallucination datasets for training detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T14:31:33Z)
• On Large Language Models' Hallucination with Regard to Known Facts [74.96789694959894]
  Large language models are successful in answering factoid questions but are also prone to hallucination. We investigate the phenomenon of LLMs possessing correct answer knowledge yet still hallucinating from the perspective of inference dynamics. Our study shed light on understanding the reasons for LLMs' hallucinations on their known facts, and more importantly, on accurately predicting when they are hallucinating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T06:48:30Z)
• In-Context Sharpness as Alerts: An Inner Representation Perspective for Hallucination Mitigation [36.31646727970656]
  Large language models (LLMs) frequently hallucinate and produce factual errors. correct generations tend to have sharper context activations in the hidden states of the in-context tokens, compared to the incorrect ones. We propose an entropy-based metric to quantify the sharpness'' among the in-context hidden states and incorporate it into the decoding process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T15:53:41Z)
• Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the Bud [69.79051730580014]
  We demonstrate the feasibility of mitigating hallucinations by verifying and minimizing the inconsistency between external knowledge present in the alignment data and the intrinsic knowledge embedded within foundation LLMs. We propose a novel approach called Knowledge Consistent Alignment (KCA), which employs a well-aligned LLM to automatically formulate assessments based on external knowledge. We demonstrate the superior efficacy of KCA in reducing hallucinations across six benchmarks, utilizing foundation LLMs of varying backbones and scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T15:39:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.