Learning to Attack: Uncovering Privacy Risks in Sequential Data Releases

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24807v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 04:32:42 GMT
• Title: Learning to Attack: Uncovering Privacy Risks in Sequential Data Releases
• Authors: Ziyao Cui, Minxing Zhang, Jian Pei,
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether an attacker can compromise privacy in sequential data releases by exploiting dependencies between consecutive publications.<n>We propose a novel attack model that captures these sequential dependencies by integrating a Hidden Markov Model with a reinforcement learning-based bi-directional inference mechanism.<n>Our results reveal a fundamental privacy risk inherent to sequential data publishing, where individually protected releases can collectively leak sensitive information when analyzed temporally.
• Score: 6.8930591070765495
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Privacy concerns have become increasingly critical in modern AI and data science applications, where sensitive information is collected, analyzed, and shared across diverse domains such as healthcare, finance, and mobility. While prior research has focused on protecting privacy in a single data release, many real-world systems operate under sequential or continuous data publishing, where the same or related data are released over time. Such sequential disclosures introduce new vulnerabilities, as temporal correlations across releases may enable adversaries to infer sensitive information that remains hidden in any individual release. In this paper, we investigate whether an attacker can compromise privacy in sequential data releases by exploiting dependencies between consecutive publications, even when each individual release satisfies standard privacy guarantees. To this end, we propose a novel attack model that captures these sequential dependencies by integrating a Hidden Markov Model with a reinforcement learning-based bi-directional inference mechanism. This enables the attacker to leverage both earlier and later observations in the sequence to infer private information. We instantiate our framework in the context of trajectory data, demonstrating how an adversary can recover sensitive locations from sequential mobility datasets. Extensive experiments on Geolife, Porto Taxi, and SynMob datasets show that our model consistently outperforms baseline approaches that treat each release independently. The results reveal a fundamental privacy risk inherent to sequential data publishing, where individually protected releases can collectively leak sensitive information when analyzed temporally. These findings underscore the need for new privacy-preserving frameworks that explicitly model temporal dependencies, such as time-aware differential privacy or sequential data obfuscation strategies.

Related papers

• Rethinking Anonymity Claims in Synthetic Data Generation: A Model-Centric Privacy Attack Perspective [18.404146545866812]
  Training generative machine learning models to produce synthetic data has become a popular approach for enhancing privacy in data sharing.<n>As this typically involves processing sensitive personal information, releasing either the trained model or generated synthetic anonymity can still pose privacy risks.<n>We argue that meaningful assessments must account for the capabilities and properties of underlying generative model and be grounded in state-of-the-art privacy attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T00:57:41Z)
• Towards Benchmarking Privacy Vulnerabilities in Selective Forgetting with Large Language Models [28.389198065125314]
  selective forgetting (also known as machine unlearning) has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.<n>Despite its promise, selective forgetting raises significant privacy concerns.<n>We present the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating privacy vulnerabilities in selective forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T20:04:06Z)
• How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy [52.00934156883483]
  Differential Privacy (DP) is a framework for reasoning about and limiting information leakage.<n>Differentially Private Synthetic data refers to synthetic data that preserves the overall trends of source data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T21:14:39Z)
• Synth-MIA: A Testbed for Auditing Privacy Leakage in Tabular Data Synthesis [8.4361320391543]
  Tabular Generative Models are often argued to preserve privacy by creating synthetic datasets that resemble training data.<n>Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) have recently emerged as a method for evaluating privacy leakage in synthetic data.<n>We propose a unified, model-agnostic threat framework that deploys a collection of attacks to estimate the maximum empirical privacy leakage in synthetic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T16:53:38Z)
• On the MIA Vulnerability Gap Between Private GANs and Diffusion Models [51.53790101362898]
  Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and diffusion models have emerged as leading approaches for high-quality image synthesis.<n>We present the first unified theoretical and empirical analysis of the privacy risks faced by differentially private generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T14:18:22Z)
• DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspective [70.77570343385928]
  We introduce a novel taxonomy, classifying existing methods based on their reliance on internal features (IF) (inherent to the data) versus external features (EF) (artificially introduced for auditing)<n>We formulate two primary attack types: evasion attacks, designed to conceal the use of a dataset, and forgery attacks, intending to falsely implicate an unused dataset.<n>Building on the understanding of existing methods and attack objectives, we further propose systematic attack strategies: decoupling, removal, and detection for evasion; adversarial example-based methods for forgery.<n>Our benchmark, DATABench, comprises 17 evasion attacks, 5 forgery attacks, and 9
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T03:07:15Z)
• Enforcing Demographic Coherence: A Harms Aware Framework for Reasoning about Private Data Release [14.939460540040459]
  We introduce demographic coherence, a condition inspired by privacy attacks that we argue is necessary for data privacy.<n>Our framework focuses on confidence rated predictors, which can in turn be distilled from almost any data-informed process.<n>We prove that every differentially private data release is also demographically coherent, and that there are demographically coherent algorithms which are not differentially private.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T20:42:30Z)
• Tabular Data Synthesis with Differential Privacy: A Survey [24.500349285858597]
  Data sharing is a prerequisite for collaborative innovation, enabling organizations to leverage diverse datasets for deeper insights. Data synthesis tackles this by generating artificial datasets that preserve the statistical characteristics of real data. Differentially private data synthesis has emerged as a promising approach to privacy-aware data sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T06:32:48Z)
• Privacy Backdoors: Enhancing Membership Inference through Poisoning Pre-trained Models [112.48136829374741]
  In this paper, we unveil a new vulnerability: the privacy backdoor attack. When a victim fine-tunes a backdoored model, their training data will be leaked at a significantly higher rate than if they had fine-tuned a typical model. Our findings highlight a critical privacy concern within the machine learning community and call for a reevaluation of safety protocols in the use of open-source pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• $\alpha$-Mutual Information: A Tunable Privacy Measure for Privacy Protection in Data Sharing [4.475091558538915]
  This paper adopts Arimoto's $alpha$-Mutual Information as a tunable privacy measure. We formulate a general distortion-based mechanism that manipulates the original data to offer privacy protection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T16:26:14Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
  Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing. Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
• Approximate, Adapt, Anonymize (3A): a Framework for Privacy Preserving Training Data Release for Machine Learning [3.29354893777827]
  We introduce a data release framework, 3A (Approximate, Adapt, Anonymize), to maximize data utility for machine learning. We present experimental evidence showing minimal discrepancy between performance metrics of models trained on real versus privatized datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T18:37:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.