Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Applications, and Future Directions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25445v1
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 12:11:34 GMT
- Title: Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Applications, and Future Directions
- Authors: Mohamad Abou Ali, Fadi Dornaika,
- Abstract summary: Agentic AI represents a transformative shift in artificial intelligence.<n>Its rapid advancement has led to a fragmented understanding, often conflating modern neural systems with outdated symbolic models.<n>This survey introduces a novel dual-paradigm framework that categorizes agentic systems into two distinct lineages.
- Score: 10.453339156813852
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Agentic AI represents a transformative shift in artificial intelligence, but its rapid advancement has led to a fragmented understanding, often conflating modern neural systems with outdated symbolic models -- a practice known as conceptual retrofitting. This survey cuts through this confusion by introducing a novel dual-paradigm framework that categorizes agentic systems into two distinct lineages: the Symbolic/Classical (relying on algorithmic planning and persistent state) and the Neural/Generative (leveraging stochastic generation and prompt-driven orchestration). Through a systematic PRISMA-based review of 90 studies (2018--2025), we provide a comprehensive analysis structured around this framework across three dimensions: (1) the theoretical foundations and architectural principles defining each paradigm; (2) domain-specific implementations in healthcare, finance, and robotics, demonstrating how application constraints dictate paradigm selection; and (3) paradigm-specific ethical and governance challenges, revealing divergent risks and mitigation strategies. Our analysis reveals that the choice of paradigm is strategic: symbolic systems dominate safety-critical domains (e.g., healthcare), while neural systems prevail in adaptive, data-rich environments (e.g., finance). Furthermore, we identify critical research gaps, including a significant deficit in governance models for symbolic systems and a pressing need for hybrid neuro-symbolic architectures. The findings culminate in a strategic roadmap arguing that the future of Agentic AI lies not in the dominance of one paradigm, but in their intentional integration to create systems that are both adaptable and reliable. This work provides the essential conceptual toolkit to guide future research, development, and policy toward robust and trustworthy hybrid intelligent systems.
Related papers
- The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities [4.52683540940001]
This chapter examines the emergence of agentic AI systems that operate autonomously in complex environments.<n>We trace the architectural progression from statistical models to transformer-based systems, identifying capabilities that enable agentic behavior.<n>Unlike existing surveys, we focus on the architectural transition from language understanding to autonomous action, emphasizing the technical gaps that must be resolved before deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T06:31:42Z) - From Educational Analytics to AI Governance: Transferable Lessons from Complex Systems Interventions [0.0]
We argue that five core principles developed within CAPIRE transfer directly to the challenge of governing AI systems.<n>The isomorphism is not merely analogical: both domains exhibit non-linearity, emergence, feedback loops, strategic adaptation, and path dependence.<n>We propose Complex Systems AI Governance (CSAIG) as an integrated framework that operationalises these principles for regulatory design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-15T12:16:57Z) - AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z) - Hybrid Neuro-Symbolic Models for Ethical AI in Risk-Sensitive Domains [0.0]
Hybrid neuro symbolic models combine the pattern-recognition strengths of neural networks with the interpretability and logical rigor of symbolic reasoning.<n>This paper surveys hybrid architectures, ethical design considerations, and deployment patterns that balance accuracy with accountability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-20T03:39:01Z) - PISA: A Pragmatic Psych-Inspired Unified Memory System for Enhanced AI Agency [50.712873697511206]
Existing work often lacks adaptability to diverse tasks and overlooks the constructive and task-oriented role of AI agent memory.<n>We propose PISA, a pragmatic, psych-inspired unified memory system that treats memory as a constructive and adaptive process.<n>Our empirical evaluation, conducted on the existing LOCOMO benchmark and our newly proposed AggQA benchmark for data analysis tasks, confirms that PISA sets a new state-of-the-art by significantly enhancing adaptability and long-term knowledge retention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-12T10:34:35Z) - A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z) - Reasoning RAG via System 1 or System 2: A Survey on Reasoning Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Industry Challenges [6.615766570234612]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful framework to overcome the knowledge limitations of Large Language Models.<n>To address these challenges, the field has shifted toward Reasoning Agentic RAG, a paradigm that embeds decision-making and adaptive tool use directly into the retrieval process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T07:01:56Z) - Distinguishing Autonomous AI Agents from Collaborative Agentic Systems: A Comprehensive Framework for Understanding Modern Intelligent Architectures [0.0]
The emergence of large language models has catalyzed two distinct yet interconnected paradigms in artificial intelligence: standalone AI Agents and collaborative Agentic AI ecosystems.<n>This study establishes a definitive framework for distinguishing these architectures through systematic analysis of their operational principles, structural compositions, and deployment methodologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T08:52:23Z) - Topological Structure Learning Should Be A Research Priority for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems [69.95482609893236]
Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for tackling complex tasks through collaborative intelligence.<n>We call for a paradigm shift toward emphtopology-aware MASs that explicitly model and dynamically optimize the structure of inter-agent interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T15:20:09Z) - Continuum-Interaction-Driven Intelligence: Human-Aligned Neural Architecture via Crystallized Reasoning and Fluid Generation [1.5800607910450124]
Current AI systems face challenges including hallucination, unpredictability, and misalignment with human decision-making.<n>This study proposes a dual-channel intelligent architecture that integrates probabilistic generation (LLMs) with white-box procedural reasoning (chain-of-thought) to construct interpretable, continuously learnable, and human-aligned AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-12T18:15:49Z) - Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems [132.77459963706437]
This book provides a comprehensive overview, framing intelligent agents within modular, brain-inspired architectures.<n>It explores self-enhancement and adaptive evolution mechanisms, exploring how agents autonomously refine their capabilities.<n>It also examines the collective intelligence emerging from agent interactions, cooperation, and societal structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-31T18:00:29Z) - Knowledge Integration Strategies in Autonomous Vehicle Prediction and Planning: A Comprehensive Survey [0.0]
This comprehensive survey examines the integration of knowledge-based approaches in autonomous driving systems.<n>We analyze various methodologies for incorporating domain knowledge, traffic rules, and commonsense reasoning into autonomous driving systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-13T19:32:41Z) - Beyond Accidents and Misuse: Decoding the Structural Risk Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
This paper advances the concept of structural risk by introducing a framework grounded in complex systems research.<n>We classify structural risks into three categories: antecedent structural causes, antecedent AI system causes, and deleterious feedback loops.<n>To anticipate and govern these dynamics, the paper proposes a methodological agenda incorporating scenario mapping, simulation, and exploratory foresight.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T05:44:50Z) - Towards Data-and Knowledge-Driven Artificial Intelligence: A Survey on Neuro-Symbolic Computing [73.0977635031713]
Neural-symbolic computing (NeSy) has been an active research area of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for many years.
NeSy shows promise of reconciling the advantages of reasoning and interpretability of symbolic representation and robust learning in neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-28T04:38:10Z) - Neuro-symbolic Architectures for Context Understanding [59.899606495602406]
We propose the use of hybrid AI methodology as a framework for combining the strengths of data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches.
Specifically, we inherit the concept of neuro-symbolism as a way of using knowledge-bases to guide the learning progress of deep neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-09T15:04:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.