Towards Explainable and Reliable AI in Finance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26353v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 11:05:15 GMT
• Title: Towards Explainable and Reliable AI in Finance
• Authors: Albi Isufaj, Pablo Mollá, Helmut Prendinger,
• Abstract summary: We present several approaches to explainable and reliable AI in finance.<n>By integrating predictive performance with reliability estimation and rule-based reasoning, our framework advances transparent and auditable financial AI systems.
• Score: 2.666791490663749
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Financial forecasting increasingly uses large neural network models, but their opacity raises challenges for trust and regulatory compliance. We present several approaches to explainable and reliable AI in finance. \emph{First}, we describe how Time-LLM, a time series foundation model, uses a prompt to avoid a wrong directional forecast. \emph{Second}, we show that combining foundation models for time series forecasting with a reliability estimator can filter our unreliable predictions. \emph{Third}, we argue for symbolic reasoning encoding domain rules for transparent justification. These approaches shift emphasize executing only forecasts that are both reliable and explainable. Experiments on equity and cryptocurrency data show that the architecture reduces false positives and supports selective execution. By integrating predictive performance with reliability estimation and rule-based reasoning, our framework advances transparent and auditable financial AI systems.

Related papers

• Financial Fraud Identification and Interpretability Study for Listed Companies Based on Convolutional Neural Network [4.504327589607446]
  This paper proposes a financial fraud detection framework for Chinese A-share listed companies based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs)<n> Experiments show that the CNN outperforms logistic regression and LightGBM in accuracy, robustness, and early-warning performance.<n>We find that solvency, ratio structure, governance structure, and internal control are general predictors of fraud, while environmental indicators matter mainly in high-pollution industries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T04:14:16Z)
• Faithful and Interpretable Explanations for Complex Ensemble Time Series Forecasts using Surrogate Models and Forecastability Analysis [1.5751034894694789]
  We develop a surrogate-based explanation methodology that bridges the accuracy-interpretability gap.<n>We integrate spectral predictability analysis to quantify each series' inherent forecastability.<n>The resulting framework delivers interpretable, instance-level explanations for state-of-the-art ensemble forecasts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T18:49:45Z)
• FinZero: Launching Multi-modal Financial Time Series Forecast with Large Reasoning Model [27.20045729222667]
  FinZero is a multimodal pre-trained model finetuned by UARPO to perform reasoning, prediction, and analytical understanding on the FVLDB financial time series.<n>After fine-tuning with UARPO, FinZero achieves an approximate 13.48% improvement in prediction accuracy over GPT-4o in the high-confidence group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T16:32:41Z)
• FinChain: A Symbolic Benchmark for Verifiable Chain-of-Thought Financial Reasoning [82.7292329605713]
  FinChain is the first benchmark specifically designed for verifiable Chain-of-Thought evaluation in finance.<n>It spans 58 topics across 12 financial domains, each represented by parameterized symbolic templates with executable Python traces.<n>FinChain exposes persistent weaknesses in multi-step financial reasoning and provides a foundation for developing trustworthy, interpretable, and verifiable financial AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T06:44:42Z)
• Financial Fraud Detection Using Explainable AI and Stacking Ensemble Methods [0.6642919568083927]
  We propose a fraud detection framework that combines a stacking ensemble of gradient boosting models: XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost.<n>XAI techniques are used to enhance the transparency and interpretability of the model's decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T07:53:02Z)
• Consistency Checks for Language Model Forecasters [54.62507816753479]
  We measure the performance of forecasters in terms of the consistency of their predictions on different logically-related questions.<n>We build an automated evaluation system that generates a set of base questions, instantiates consistency checks from these questions, elicits predictions of the forecaster, and measures the consistency of the predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T16:51:35Z)
• Exchangeable Sequence Models Quantify Uncertainty Over Latent Concepts [6.256239986541708]
  We show that pre-trained sequence models are naturally capable of probabilistic reasoning over exchangeable data points.<n>A sequence model learns the relationship between observations, which differs from typical Bayesian models.<n>We show the sequence prediction loss controls the quality of uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T17:16:10Z)
• Measuring Consistency in Text-based Financial Forecasting Models [10.339586273664725]
  FinTrust is an evaluation tool that assesses logical consistency in financial text. We show that the consistency of state-of-the-art NLP models for financial forecasting is poor. Our analysis of the performance degradation caused by meaning-preserving alternations suggests that current text-based methods are not suitable for robustly predicting market information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T10:32:26Z)
• Interpretable Self-Aware Neural Networks for Robust Trajectory Prediction [50.79827516897913]
  We introduce an interpretable paradigm for trajectory prediction that distributes the uncertainty among semantic concepts. We validate our approach on real-world autonomous driving data, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T06:28:20Z)
• Bayesian Bilinear Neural Network for Predicting the Mid-price Dynamics in Limit-Order Book Markets [84.90242084523565]
  Traditional time-series econometric methods often appear incapable of capturing the true complexity of the multi-level interactions driving the price dynamics. By adopting a state-of-the-art second-order optimization algorithm, we train a Bayesian bilinear neural network with temporal attention. By addressing the use of predictive distributions to analyze errors and uncertainties associated with the estimated parameters and model forecasts, we thoroughly compare our Bayesian model with traditional ML alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-07T18:59:54Z)
• Learning to Predict Trustworthiness with Steep Slope Loss [69.40817968905495]
  We study the problem of predicting trustworthiness on real-world large-scale datasets. We observe that the trustworthiness predictors trained with prior-art loss functions are prone to view both correct predictions and incorrect predictions to be trustworthy. We propose a novel steep slope loss to separate the features w.r.t. correct predictions from the ones w.r.t. incorrect predictions by two slide-like curves that oppose each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T19:19:09Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.