Scales++: Compute Efficient Evaluation Subset Selection with Cognitive Scales Embeddings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26384v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 11:28:58 GMT
• Title: Scales++: Compute Efficient Evaluation Subset Selection with Cognitive Scales Embeddings
• Authors: Andrew M. Bean, Nabeel Seedat, Shengzhuang Chen, Jonathan Richard Schwarz,
• Abstract summary: We propose a item-centric approach to benchmark subset selection, arguing that selection should be based on the intrinsic properties of the task items themselves.<n>We show Scales++ reduces the upfront selection cost by over 18x while achieving competitive predictive fidelity.<n>We demonstrate that this item-centric approach enables more efficient model evaluation without significant fidelity degradation.
• Score: 23.9553588103042
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The prohibitive cost of evaluating large language models (LLMs) on comprehensive benchmarks necessitates the creation of small yet representative data subsets (i.e., tiny benchmarks) that enable efficient assessment while retaining predictive fidelity. Current methods for this task operate under a model-centric paradigm, selecting benchmarking items based on the collective performance of existing models. Such approaches are limited by large upfront costs, an inability to immediately handle new benchmarks (`cold-start'), and the fragile assumption that future models will share the failure patterns of their predecessors. In this work, we challenge this paradigm and propose a item-centric approach to benchmark subset selection, arguing that selection should be based on the intrinsic properties of the task items themselves, rather than on model-specific failure patterns. We instantiate this item-centric efficient benchmarking approach via a novel method, Scales++, where data selection is based on the cognitive demands of the benchmark samples. Empirically, we show Scales++ reduces the upfront selection cost by over 18x while achieving competitive predictive fidelity. On the Open LLM Leaderboard, using just a 0.5\% data subset, we predict full benchmark scores with a 2.9% mean absolute error. We demonstrate that this item-centric approach enables more efficient model evaluation without significant fidelity degradation, while also providing better cold-start performance and more interpretable benchmarking.

Related papers

• IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation [85.56193980646981]
  We propose IF-RewardBench, a comprehensive meta-evaluation benchmark for instruction-following.<n>For each instruction, we construct a preference graph containing all pairwise preferences among multiple responses.<n>Experiments on IF-RewardBench reveal significant deficiencies in current judge models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T02:21:17Z)
• SparseEval: Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models by Sparse Optimization [64.95852289011385]
  Large language models (LLMs) continue to scale up, their performance on various downstream tasks has significantly improved.<n> evaluating their capabilities has become increasingly expensive, as performing inference on a large number of benchmark samples incurs high computational costs.<n>We propose SparseEval, a method that, for the first time, adopts gradient descent to optimize anchor weights and employs an iterative refinement strategy for anchor selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T11:12:45Z)
• Aligning Language Model Benchmarks with Pairwise Preferences [15.427340427081843]
  We introduce benchmark alignment, where we use limited amounts of information about model performance to automatically update offline benchmarks.<n>We then propose BenchAlign, which learns preference-aligned weight-ings for benchmark questions.<n>Our experiments show that our aligned benchmarks can accurately rank unseen models according to models of human preferences, even across different sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T23:11:09Z)
• Learning More from Less: Unlocking Internal Representations for Benchmark Compression [37.69575776639016]
  We introduce REPCORE, which aligns heterogeneous hidden states into a unified latent space to construct representative coresets.<n>Experiments on five benchmarks and over 200 models show consistent gains over output-based baselines in ranking correlation and estimation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T13:11:39Z)
• How Benchmark Prediction from Fewer Data Misses the Mark [18.693874781163657]
  Benchmark prediction aims to select a small subset of evaluation points and predict overall benchmark performance from that subset.<n>This paper systematically assesses the strengths and limitations of 11 benchmark prediction methods across 19 diverse benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T11:50:41Z)
• How to Select Datapoints for Efficient Human Evaluation of NLG Models? [57.60407340254572]
  We develop and analyze a suite of selectors to get the most informative datapoints for human evaluation.<n>We show that selectors based on variance in automated metric scores, diversity in model outputs, or Item Response Theory outperform random selection.<n>In particular, we introduce source-based estimators, which predict item usefulness for human evaluation just based on the source texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T10:33:26Z)
• Exploring Query Efficient Data Generation towards Data-free Model Stealing in Hard Label Setting [38.755154033324374]
  Data-free model stealing involves replicating the functionality of a target model into a substitute model without accessing the target model's structure, parameters, or training data.<n>This paper presents a new data-free model stealing approach called Query Efficient Data Generation (textbfQEDG)<n>We introduce two distinct loss functions to ensure the generation of sufficient samples that closely and uniformly align with the target model's decision boundary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T03:03:15Z)
• LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content [62.816876067499415]
  We propose LiveXiv: a scalable evolving live benchmark based on scientific ArXiv papers.<n>LiveXiv accesses domain-specific manuscripts at any given timestamp and proposes to automatically generate visual question-answer pairs.<n>We benchmark multiple open and proprietary Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) on the first version of our benchmark, showing its challenging nature and exposing the models true abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:51:23Z)
• Data Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models and Text-to-Image Models via Adaptive Sampling [3.7467864495337624]
  SubLIME is a data-efficient evaluation framework for text-to-image models. Our approach ensures statistically aligned model rankings compared to full datasets. We leverage the HEIM leaderboard to cover 25 text-to-image models on 17 different benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T07:38:55Z)
• Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question Correction [49.729908337372436]
  We propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Inspired by the principles in subjective question correction, we propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Results on three information extraction tasks show that SQC-Score is more preferred by human annotators than the baseline metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:36:53Z)
• Self-Supervised Dataset Distillation for Transfer Learning [77.4714995131992]
  We propose a novel problem of distilling an unlabeled dataset into a set of small synthetic samples for efficient self-supervised learning (SSL) We first prove that a gradient of synthetic samples with respect to a SSL objective in naive bilevel optimization is textitbiased due to randomness originating from data augmentations or masking. We empirically validate the effectiveness of our method on various applications involving transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:48:52Z)
• Evaluating Representations with Readout Model Switching [19.907607374144167]
  In this paper, we propose to use the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle to devise an evaluation metric. We design a hybrid discrete and continuous-valued model space for the readout models and employ a switching strategy to combine their predictions. The proposed metric can be efficiently computed with an online method and we present results for pre-trained vision encoders of various architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T14:08:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.