Counteracting Matthew Effect in Self-Improvement of LVLMs through Head-Tail Re-balancing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26474v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:26:58 GMT
• Title: Counteracting Matthew Effect in Self-Improvement of LVLMs through Head-Tail Re-balancing
• Authors: Xin Guo, Zhiheng Xi, Yiwen Ding, Yitao Zhai, Xiaowei Shi, Xunliang Cai, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang,
• Abstract summary: Self-improvement has emerged as a mainstream paradigm for advancing the reasoning capabilities of large vision-language models.<n>We introduce four efficient strategies to achieve head-tail re-balancing during the exploration-and-learning self-improvement process.<n>Our methods consistently improve visual reasoning capabilities, outperforming vanilla self-improvement by 3.86 points on average.
• Score: 70.35701681177655
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Self-improvement has emerged as a mainstream paradigm for advancing the reasoning capabilities of large vision-language models (LVLMs), where models explore and learn from successful trajectories iteratively. However, we identify a critical issue during this process: the model excels at generating high-quality trajectories for simple queries (i.e., head data) but struggles with more complex ones (i.e., tail data). This leads to an imbalanced optimization that drives the model to prioritize simple reasoning skills, while hindering its ability to tackle more complex reasoning tasks. Over iterations, this imbalance becomes increasingly pronounced--a dynamic we term the "Matthew effect"--which ultimately hinders further model improvement and leads to performance bottlenecks. To counteract this challenge, we introduce four efficient strategies from two perspectives: distribution-reshaping and trajectory-resampling, to achieve head-tail re-balancing during the exploration-and-learning self-improvement process. Extensive experiments on Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct and InternVL2.5-4B models across visual reasoning tasks demonstrate that our methods consistently improve visual reasoning capabilities, outperforming vanilla self-improvement by 3.86 points on average.

Related papers

• Dual-Phase LLM Reasoning: Self-Evolved Mathematical Frameworks [48.105258051884384]
  This paper proposes a new two-stage training framework that enhances models' self-correction capabilities.<n>During the first stage, a multi-turn dialogue strategy guides the model to generate long chain-of-thought (CoT) data.<n>The second stage employs a difficulty-aware rejection sampling mechanism to dynamically optimize data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T08:19:11Z)
• When Actions Teach You to Think: Reasoning-Action Synergy via Reinforcement Learning in Conversational Agents [2.689316553293938]
  Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) has emerged as one of the most effective ways to improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) in downstream tasks.<n>We propose a pipeline in which LLMs generate reasoning steps that guide both the invocation of tools and the final answer generation for conversational agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T04:44:40Z)
• Agentic Jigsaw Interaction Learning for Enhancing Visual Perception and Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [63.69856480318313]
  AGILE formulates jigsaw solving as an interactive process, enabling the model to progressively engage with the environment.<n>We show that AGILE substantially boosts performance on jigsaw tasks of varying complexity.<n>We also demonstrate strong generalization across 9 general vision tasks, achieving an average improvement of 3.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T17:58:05Z)
• More Thought, Less Accuracy? On the Dual Nature of Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [17.431298099935344]
  Reasoning has emerged as a pivotal capability in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent research has sought to extend reasoning to Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>Our study uncovers the dual nature of multimodal reasoning, leading to recognition failures on otherwise basic visual questions.<n>We propose Vision-Anchored Policy Optimization (VAPO), a simple yet effective method that explicitly steers the reasoning process toward visually grounded trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T06:37:47Z)
• Sycophancy Mitigation Through Reinforcement Learning with Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories [58.988535279557546]
  We introduce textbf sycophancy Mitigation through Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories.<n>We show that SMART significantly reduces sycophantic behavior while preserving strong performance on out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T17:09:14Z)
• Exploring and Exploiting the Inherent Efficiency within Large Reasoning Models for Self-Guided Efficiency Enhancement [101.77467538102924]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit overthinking, which hinders efficiency and inflates inference cost.<n>We propose two lightweight methods to enhance LRM efficiency.<n>First, we introduce Efficiency Steering, a training-free activation steering technique that modulates reasoning behavior via a single direction.<n>Second, we develop Self-Rewarded Efficiency RL, a reinforcement learning framework that dynamically balances task accuracy and brevity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:18:12Z)
• OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL Cycles [91.88062410741833]
  We introduce OpenVLThinker, one of the first open-source large vision-language models (LVLMs) to exhibit sophisticated chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>We show that OpenVLThinker-7B consistently advances performance across six benchmarks demanding mathematical and general reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z)
• Iterative Deepening Sampling as Efficient Test-Time Scaling [27.807695570974644]
  Recent reasoning models, such as OpenAI's O1 series, have demonstrated exceptional performance on complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose a novel iterative deepening sampling algorithm framework designed to enhance self-correction and generate higher-quality samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T04:39:51Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervision [120.40788744292739]
  We propose a two-player paradigm that separates the roles of reasoning and critique models. We first propose AutoMathCritique, an automated and scalable framework for collecting critique data. We demonstrate that the critique models consistently improve the actor's performance on difficult queries at test-time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T17:11:54Z)
• SRA-MCTS: Self-driven Reasoning Augmentation with Monte Carlo Tree Search for Code Generation [14.786100203787194]
  Large language models demonstrate exceptional performance in simple code generation tasks but face challenges in tackling complex problems.<n>We propose a reasoning-augmented data generation process, SRA-MCTS, which guides the model to autonomously generate high-quality intermediate reasoning paths.<n>Our method operates entirely through the model itself without requiring additional supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T12:31:04Z)
• CogCoM: A Visual Language Model with Chain-of-Manipulations Reasoning [61.21923643289266]
  Chain of Manipulations is a mechanism that enables Vision-Language Models to solve problems step-by-step with evidence.<n>After training, models can solve various visual problems by eliciting intrinsic manipulations (e.g., grounding, zoom in) actively without involving external tools.<n>Our trained model, textbfCogCoM, achieves state-of-the-art performance across 9 benchmarks from 4 categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T18:43:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.