Bridging the Gap between Empirical Welfare Maximization and Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation in Policy Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26723v2
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 17:42:08 GMT
• Title: Bridging the Gap between Empirical Welfare Maximization and Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation in Policy Learning
• Authors: Masahiro Kato,
• Abstract summary: Two major approaches in policy learning: the empirical population welfare (EWM) approach and the plug-in approach.<n>This study bridges the gap between the two approaches by showing that both are based on essentially the same optimization problem.
• Score: 6.44705221140412
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The goal of policy learning is to train a policy function that recommends a treatment given covariates to maximize population welfare. There are two major approaches in policy learning: the empirical welfare maximization (EWM) approach and the plug-in approach. The EWM approach is analogous to a classification problem, where one first builds an estimator of the population welfare, which is a functional of policy functions, and then trains a policy by maximizing the estimated welfare. In contrast, the plug-in approach is based on regression, where one first estimates the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) and then recommends the treatment with the highest estimated outcome. This study bridges the gap between the two approaches by showing that both are based on essentially the same optimization problem. In particular, we prove an exact equivalence between EWM and least squares over a reparameterization of the policy class. As a consequence, the two approaches are interchangeable in several respects and share the same theoretical guarantees under common conditions. Leveraging this equivalence, we propose a regularization method for policy learning. The reduction to least squares yields a smooth surrogate that is typically easier to optimize in practice. At the same time, for many natural policy classes the inherent combinatorial hardness of exact EWM generally remains, so the reduction should be viewed as an optimization aid rather than a universal bypass of NP-hardness.

Related papers

• Causal-Policy Forest for End-to-End Policy Learning [6.44705221140412]
  This study proposes an end-to-end algorithm for policy learning in causal inference.<n>We modify the causal forest, an end-to-end CATE estimation algorithm, for policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-28T09:03:40Z)
• Convergence and Sample Complexity of First-Order Methods for Agnostic Reinforcement Learning [66.4260157478436]
  We study reinforcement learning in the policy learning setting.<n>The goal is to find a policy whose performance is competitive with the best policy in a given class of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T14:40:05Z)
• Achieving $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ Regret in Average-Reward POMDPs with Known Observation Models [69.1820058966619]
  We tackle average-reward infinite-horizon POMDPs with an unknown transition model.<n>We present a novel and simple estimator that overcomes this barrier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T22:29:41Z)
• Optimal Policy Adaptation under Covariate Shift [15.703626346971182]
  We propose principled approaches for learning the optimal policy in the target domain by leveraging two datasets.<n>We derive the identifiability assumptions for the reward induced by a given policy.<n>We then learn the optimal policy by optimizing the estimated reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T12:33:02Z)
• Strongly-polynomial time and validation analysis of policy gradient methods [3.722665817361884]
  This paper proposes a novel termination criterion, termed the advantage gap function, for finite state and action Markov decision processes (MDP) and reinforcement learning (RL)<n>By incorporating this advantage gap function into the design of step size rules, we deriving a new linear rate of convergence that is independent of the stationary state distribution of the optimal policy.<n>This is the first time that such strong convergence properties have been established for policy gradient methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T18:56:48Z)
• POTEC: Off-Policy Learning for Large Action Spaces via Two-Stage Policy Decomposition [40.851324484481275]
  We study off-policy learning of contextual bandit policies in large discrete action spaces. We propose a novel two-stage algorithm, called Policy Optimization via Two-Stage Policy Decomposition. We show that POTEC provides substantial improvements in OPL effectiveness particularly in large and structured action spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T03:01:13Z)
• Clipped-Objective Policy Gradients for Pessimistic Policy Optimization [3.2996723916635275]
  Policy gradient methods seek to produce monotonic improvement through bounded changes in policy outputs. In this work, we find that the performance of PPO, when applied to continuous action spaces, may be consistently improved through a simple change in objective. We show that the clipped-objective policy gradient (COPG) objective is on average "pessimistic" compared to both the PPO objective and (2) this pessimism promotes enhanced exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T03:02:49Z)
• Last-Iterate Convergent Policy Gradient Primal-Dual Methods for Constrained MDPs [107.28031292946774]
  We study the problem of computing an optimal policy of an infinite-horizon discounted Markov decision process (constrained MDP) We develop two single-time-scale policy-based primal-dual algorithms with non-asymptotic convergence of their policy iterates to an optimal constrained policy. To the best of our knowledge, this work appears to be the first non-asymptotic policy last-iterate convergence result for single-time-scale algorithms in constrained MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T17:27:31Z)
• Policy learning "without" overlap: Pessimism and generalized empirical Bernstein's inequality [94.89246810243053]
  This paper studies offline policy learning, which aims at utilizing observations collected a priori to learn an optimal individualized decision rule.<n>Existing policy learning methods rely on a uniform overlap assumption, i.e., the propensities of exploring all actions for all individual characteristics must be lower bounded.<n>We propose Pessimistic Policy Learning (PPL), a new algorithm that optimize lower confidence bounds (LCBs) instead of point estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T22:43:08Z)
• Stochastic first-order methods for average-reward Markov decision processes [10.023632561462712]
  We study average-reward Markov decision processes (AMDPs) and develop novel first-order methods with strong theoretical guarantees for both policy optimization and policy evaluation. By combining the policy evaluation and policy optimization parts, we establish sample complexity results for solving AMDPs under both generative and Markovian noise models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-11T23:02:46Z)
• Understanding the Effect of Stochasticity in Policy Optimization [86.7574122154668]
  We show that the preferability of optimization methods depends critically on whether exact gradients are used. Second, to explain these findings we introduce the concept of committal rate for policy optimization. Third, we show that in the absence of external oracle information, there is an inherent trade-off between exploiting geometry to accelerate convergence versus achieving optimality almost surely.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T06:35:44Z)
• State Augmented Constrained Reinforcement Learning: Overcoming the Limitations of Learning with Rewards [88.30521204048551]
  A common formulation of constrained reinforcement learning involves multiple rewards that must individually accumulate to given thresholds. We show a simple example in which the desired optimal policy cannot be induced by any weighted linear combination of rewards. This work addresses this shortcoming by augmenting the state with Lagrange multipliers and reinterpreting primal-dual methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T21:07:35Z)
• Average-Reward Off-Policy Policy Evaluation with Function Approximation [66.67075551933438]
  We consider off-policy policy evaluation with function approximation in average-reward MDPs. bootstrapping is necessary and, along with off-policy learning and FA, results in the deadly triad. We propose two novel algorithms, reproducing the celebrated success of Gradient TD algorithms in the average-reward setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-08T00:43:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.