Using Synthetic Data to estimate the True Error is theoretically and practically doable

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00964v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2025 15:00:12 GMT
• Title: Using Synthetic Data to estimate the True Error is theoretically and practically doable
• Authors: Hai Hoang Thanh, Duy-Tung Nguyen, Hung The Tran, Khoat Than,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the use of synthetic data to estimate the test error of a trained model under limited labeled data conditions.<n>Inspired by those bounds, we propose a theoretically grounded method to generate optimized synthetic data for model evaluation.
• Score: 2.2307507245827685
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Accurately evaluating model performance is crucial for deploying machine learning systems in real-world applications. Traditional methods often require a sufficiently large labeled test set to ensure a reliable evaluation. However, in many contexts, a large labeled dataset is costly and labor-intensive. Therefore, we sometimes have to do evaluation by a few labeled samples, which is theoretically challenging. Recent advances in generative models offer a promising alternative by enabling the synthesis of high-quality data. In this work, we make a systematic investigation about the use of synthetic data to estimate the test error of a trained model under limited labeled data conditions. To this end, we develop novel generalization bounds that take synthetic data into account. Those bounds suggest novel ways to optimize synthetic samples for evaluation and theoretically reveal the significant role of the generator's quality. Inspired by those bounds, we propose a theoretically grounded method to generate optimized synthetic data for model evaluation. Experimental results on simulation and tabular datasets demonstrate that, compared to existing baselines, our method achieves accurate and more reliable estimates of the test error.

Related papers

• Improving the Generation and Evaluation of Synthetic Data for Downstream Medical Causal Inference [89.5628648718851]
  Causal inference is essential for developing and evaluating medical interventions.<n>Real-world medical datasets are often difficult to access due to regulatory barriers.<n>We present STEAM: a novel method for generating Synthetic data for Treatment Effect Analysis in Medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T16:16:00Z)
• Valid Inference with Imperfect Synthetic Data [39.10587411316875]
  We introduce a new estimator based on generalized method of moments.<n>We find that interactions between the moment residuals of synthetic data and those of real data can greatly improve estimates of the target parameter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T18:32:52Z)
• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• The Real Deal Behind the Artificial Appeal: Inferential Utility of Tabular Synthetic Data [40.165159490379146]
  We show that the rate of false-positive findings (type 1 error) will be unacceptably high, even when the estimates are unbiased. Despite the use of a previously proposed correction factor, this problem persists for deep generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T02:04:41Z)
• Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A Comprehensive Benchmark [56.8042116967334]
  Synthetic data serves as an alternative in training machine learning models. ensuring that synthetic data mirrors the complex nuances of real-world data is a challenging task. This paper explores the potential of integrating data-centric AI techniques to guide the synthetic data generation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T20:32:02Z)
• Can You Rely on Your Model Evaluation? Improving Model Evaluation with Synthetic Test Data [75.20035991513564]
  We introduce 3S Testing, a deep generative modeling framework to facilitate model evaluation. Our experiments demonstrate that 3S Testing outperforms traditional baselines. These results raise the question of whether we need a paradigm shift away from limited real test data towards synthetic test data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T10:18:44Z)
• Utility Theory of Synthetic Data Generation [12.511220449652384]
  This paper bridges the practice-theory gap by establishing relevant utility theory in a statistical learning framework.<n>It considers two utility metrics: generalization and ranking of models trained on synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T07:49:16Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Evaluation of Categorical Generative Models -- Bridging the Gap Between Real and Synthetic Data [18.142397311464343]
  We introduce an appropriately scalable evaluation method for generative models. We consider increasingly large probability spaces, which correspond to increasingly difficult modeling tasks. We validate our evaluation procedure with synthetic experiments on both synthetic generative models and current state-of-the-art categorical generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T21:05:25Z)
• HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model Selection [77.86861638371926]
  We propose a generalized iterative imputation framework for adaptively and automatically configuring column-wise models. We provide a concrete implementation with out-of-the-box learners, simulators, and interfaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T19:10:35Z)
• A Kernelised Stein Statistic for Assessing Implicit Generative Models [10.616967871198689]
  We propose a principled procedure to assess the quality of a synthetic data generator. The sample size from the synthetic data generator can be as large as desired, while the size of the observed data, which the generator aims to emulate is fixed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T23:40:21Z)
• Foundations of Bayesian Learning from Synthetic Data [1.6249267147413522]
  We use a Bayesian paradigm to characterise the updating of model parameters when learning on synthetic data. Recent results from general Bayesian updating support a novel and robust approach to synthetic-learning founded on decision theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-16T21:49:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.