MicroRemed: Benchmarking LLMs in Microservices Remediation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01166v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 02:35:55 GMT
• Title: MicroRemed: Benchmarking LLMs in Microservices Remediation
• Authors: Lingzhe Zhang, Yunpeng Zhai, Tong Jia, Chiming Duan, Minghua He, Leyi Pan, Zhaoyang Liu, Bolin Ding, Ying Li,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) integrated with agent-based reasoning frameworks have recently shown strong potential for autonomous decision-making.<n>One promising yet underexplored direction is microservice remediation, where the goal is to automatically recover faulty microservice systems.<n>Existing approaches still rely on human-crafted prompts from Site Reliability Engineers (SREs)<n>We introduce MicroRemed, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs in end-to-end microservice remediation.
• Score: 38.338663893180446
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) integrated with agent-based reasoning frameworks have recently shown strong potential for autonomous decision-making and system-level operations. One promising yet underexplored direction is microservice remediation, where the goal is to automatically recover faulty microservice systems. Existing approaches, however, still rely on human-crafted prompts from Site Reliability Engineers (SREs), with LLMs merely converting textual instructions into executable code. To advance research in this area, we introduce MicroRemed, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs in end-to-end microservice remediation, where models must directly generate executable Ansible playbooks from diagnosis reports to restore system functionality. We further propose ThinkRemed, a multi-agent framework that emulates the reflective and perceptive reasoning of SREs. Experimental results show that MicroRemed presents substantial challenges to current LLMs, while ThinkRemed improves end-to-end remediation performance through iterative reasoning and system reflection. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/LLM4AIOps/MicroRemed.

Related papers

• Hypothesize-Then-Verify: Speculative Root Cause Analysis for Microservices with Pathwise Parallelism [19.31110304702373]
  SpecRCA is a speculative root cause analysis framework that adopts a textithypothesize-then-verify paradigm.<n>Preliminary experiments on the AIOps 2022 demonstrate that SpecRCA achieves superior accuracy and efficiency compared to existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T05:58:25Z)
• Meta-Policy Reflexion: Reusable Reflective Memory and Rule Admissibility for Resource-Efficient LLM Agent [6.300669721057781]
  Meta-Policy Reflexion (MPR) is a framework that consolidates LLM-generated reflections into a structured, predicate-like Meta-Policy Memory (MPM)<n>MPR externalizes reusable corrective knowledge without model weight updates, enforces domain constraints to reduce unsafe or invalid actions, and retains the adaptability of language-based reflection.<n> Empirical results reported in the supplied material indicate consistent gains in execution accuracy and robustness when compared to Reflexion baselines; rule admissibility further improves stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T08:18:39Z)
• MLE-Dojo: Interactive Environments for Empowering LLM Agents in Machine Learning Engineering [57.156093929365255]
  Gym-style framework for systematically reinforcement learning, evaluating, and improving autonomous large language model (LLM) agents.<n>MLE-Dojo covers diverse, open-ended MLE tasks carefully curated to reflect realistic engineering scenarios.<n>Its fully executable environment supports comprehensive agent training via both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T17:35:43Z)
• The Vulnerability of Language Model Benchmarks: Do They Accurately Reflect True LLM Performance? [1.3810901729134184]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at standardized tests while failing to demonstrate genuine language understanding and adaptability.<n>Our systematic analysis of NLP evaluation frameworks reveals pervasive vulnerabilities across the evaluation spectrum.<n>We lay the groundwork for new evaluation methods that resist manipulation, minimize data contamination, and assess domain-specific tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T20:49:21Z)
• Evaluation-Driven Development of LLM Agents: A Process Model and Reference Architecture [25.752294816136807]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled the emergence of autonomous systems capable of achieving under-specified goals.<n>We propose an evaluation-driven development approach, inspired by test-driven and behavior-driven development.<n>Our approach integrates online (runtime) and offline (redevelopment) evaluations, enabling adaptive runtime adjustments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T00:34:30Z)
• AutoPT: How Far Are We from the End2End Automated Web Penetration Testing? [54.65079443902714]
  We introduce AutoPT, an automated penetration testing agent based on the principle of PSM driven by LLMs. Our results show that AutoPT outperforms the baseline framework ReAct on the GPT-4o mini model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T13:24:30Z)
• RAG-Modulo: Solving Sequential Tasks using Experience, Critics, and Language Models [5.0741409008225755]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for solving challenging robotic tasks. Most existing LLM-based agents lack the ability to retain and learn from past interactions. We propose RAG-Modulo, a framework that enhances LLM-based agents with a memory of past interactions and incorporates critics to evaluate the agents' decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T20:03:32Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.<n>We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.<n>Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• Regression-aware Inference with LLMs [52.764328080398805]
  We show that an inference strategy can be sub-optimal for common regression and scoring evaluation metrics. We propose alternate inference strategies that estimate the Bayes-optimal solution for regression and scoring metrics in closed-form from sampled responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T03:24:34Z)
• Self-Retrieval: End-to-End Information Retrieval with One Large Language Model [97.71181484082663]
  We introduce Self-Retrieval, a novel end-to-end LLM-driven information retrieval architecture. Self-Retrieval internalizes the retrieval corpus through self-supervised learning, transforms the retrieval process into sequential passage generation, and performs relevance assessment for reranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T18:45:35Z)
• Towards Generating Executable Metamorphic Relations Using Large Language Models [46.26208489175692]
  We propose an approach for automatically deriving executable MRs from requirements using large language models (LLMs) To assess the feasibility of our approach, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey in collaboration with Siemens Industry Software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T13:52:47Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.