Speech-DRAME: A Framework for Human-Aligned Benchmarks in Speech Role-Play

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01261v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 06:12:40 GMT
• Title: Speech-DRAME: A Framework for Human-Aligned Benchmarks in Speech Role-Play
• Authors: Jiatong Shi, Jionghao Han, Yichen Lu, Santiago Pascual, Pengfei Wu, Chenye Cui, Shinji Watanabe, Chao Weng, Cong Zhou,
• Abstract summary: Speech-DRAME is a unified framework that contributes at three levels.<n>It provides the first comprehensive, reproducible foundation for assessing spoken role-play.
• Score: 68.54773980519457
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Role-play has become a key testbed for generative models, expanding from text-only dialogue to multimodal interaction. Extending role-play to speech captures prosody, emotion, and delivery, but also poses new evaluation challenges. Current pipelines often use audio large language models (ALLMs) as zero-shot judges, which miss paralinguistic cues, collapse multiple aspects into coarse scores, and rely on synthetic speech references that fail to reflect real-world roles. We present Speech-DRAME, a unified framework that contributes at three levels: (i) Speech-DRAME-EvalBench, an evaluation benchmark with bilingual human-annotated data and protocols for training and testing speech evaluation models (SEMs), (ii) DRAME-Eval, a fine-tuned evaluation model, which substantially outperforms zero-shot and few-shot ALLMs, and (iii) Speech-DRAME-RoleBench, a speech role-play benchmark that leverages DRAME-Eval as an automatic judge to compare speech foundation models (SFMs). Speech-DRAME distinguishes between two complementary evaluation strategies: Archetype Evaluation, a top-down approach measuring adherence to broad role archetypes, and Realism Evaluation, a bottom-up approach grounded in real human speech that emphasizes nuanced role quality. Compared to zero-shot ALLM judges, DRAME-Eval achieves stronger agreement with human ratings (Pearson correlation from 0.480 to 0.629 in archetypes, and 0.390 to 0.625 in realism). By integrating transparent benchmark resources, modeling approaches, and system-level evaluation, Speech-DRAME provides the first comprehensive, reproducible foundation for assessing spoken role-play.

Related papers

• On the Fallacy of Global Token Perplexity in Spoken Language Model Evaluation [88.77441715819366]
  Generative spoken language models pretrained on large-scale raw audio can continue a speech prompt with appropriate content.<n>We propose a variety of likelihood- and generative-based evaluation methods that serve in place of naive global token perplexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T22:01:56Z)
• VoxRole: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Speech-Based Role-Playing Agents [25.2769510663867]
  We introduce VoxRole, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed for the evaluation of speech-based RPCAs.<n>The benchmark comprises 13335 multi-turn dialogues, totaling 65.6 hours of speech from 1228 unique characters across 261 movies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T07:03:46Z)
• AHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Audio-Language Models [78.20477815156484]
  multimodal audio-language models (ALMs) take interleaved audio and text as input and output text.<n>AHELM is a benchmark that aggregates various datasets -- including 2 new synthetic audio-text datasets called PARADE and CoRe-Bench.<n>We also standardize the prompts, inference parameters, and evaluation metrics to ensure equitable comparisons across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T07:40:39Z)
• MTalk-Bench: Evaluating Speech-to-Speech Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues via Arena-style and Rubrics Protocols [46.82669096251444]
  MTalk-Bench is a multi-turn S2S benchmark covering three core dimensions: Semantic Information, Paralinguistic Information, and Ambient Sound.<n>Our dual-method evaluation framework combines Arena-style evaluation (pairwise comparison) and evaluation (absolute scoring) for relative and absolute assessment.<n>Results highlight current limitations in S2S evaluation and the need for more robust, speech-aware assessment frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T12:14:17Z)
• SpeechR: A Benchmark for Speech Reasoning in Large Audio-Language Models [60.72029578488467]
  SpeechR is a unified benchmark for evaluating reasoning over speech in large audio-language models.<n>It evaluates models along three key dimensions: factual retrieval, procedural inference, and normative judgment.<n> Evaluations on eleven state-of-the-art LALMs reveal that high transcription accuracy does not translate into strong reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T03:28:04Z)
• SpeechRole: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Evaluating Speech Role-Playing Agents [72.79816494079833]
  Role-playing agents have emerged as a promising paradigm for achieving personalized interaction and emotional resonance.<n>Existing research primarily focuses on the textual modality, neglecting the critical dimension of speech in realistic interactive scenarios.<n>We construct SpeechRole-Data, a large-scale, high-quality dataset that comprises 98 diverse roles and 112k speech-based single-turn and multi-turn conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T03:18:36Z)
• Speechworthy Instruction-tuned Language Models [71.8586707840169]
  We show that both prompting and preference learning increase the speech-suitability of popular instruction-tuned LLMs. We share lexical, syntactical, and qualitative analyses to showcase how each method contributes to improving the speech-suitability of generated responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T02:34:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.