PROPEX-RAG: Enhanced GraphRAG using Prompt-Driven Prompt Execution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01802v1
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:00:56 GMT
- Title: PROPEX-RAG: Enhanced GraphRAG using Prompt-Driven Prompt Execution
- Authors: Tejas Sarnaik, Manan Shah, Ravi Hegde,
- Abstract summary: We present a prompt-driven GraphRAG framework that underscores the significance of prompt formulation in facilitating entity extraction, fact selection, and passage reranking.<n>Our system gets state-of-the-art performance on HotpotQA and 2WikiMultiHopQA, with F1 scores of 80.7% and 78.9%, and Recall@5 scores of 97.1% and 98.1%, respectively.
- Score: 4.1390735746263685
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a robust framework for enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) with external knowledge. Recent advances in RAG have investigated graph based retrieval for intricate reasoning; however, the influence of prompt design on enhancing the retrieval and reasoning process is still considerably under-examined. In this paper, we present a prompt-driven GraphRAG framework that underscores the significance of prompt formulation in facilitating entity extraction, fact selection, and passage reranking for multi-hop question answering. Our approach creates a symbolic knowledge graph from text data by encoding entities and factual relationships as structured facts triples. We use LLMs selectively during online retrieval to perform semantic filtering and answer generation. We also use entity-guided graph traversal through Personalized PageRank (PPR) to support efficient, scalable retrieval based on the knowledge graph we built. Our system gets state-of-the-art performance on HotpotQA and 2WikiMultiHopQA, with F1 scores of 80.7% and 78.9%, and Recall@5 scores of 97.1% and 98.1%, respectively. These results show that prompt design is an important part of improving retrieval accuracy and response quality. This research lays the groundwork for more efficient and comprehensible multi-hop question-answering systems, highlighting the importance of prompt-aware graph reasoning.
Related papers
- ProGraph-R1: Progress-aware Reinforcement Learning for Graph Retrieval Augmented Generation [37.11787010202267]
We propose ProGraph-R1, a progress-aware agentic framework for graph-based retrieval and multi-step reasoning.<n>ProGraph-R1 introduces a structure-aware hypergraph retrieval mechanism that jointly considers semantic relevance and graph connectivity.<n> Experiments on multi-hop question answering benchmarks demonstrate that ProGraph-R1 consistently improves reasoning accuracy and generation quality over existing GraphRAG methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-25T08:58:44Z) - Graph-Anchored Knowledge Indexing for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [53.42323544075114]
We propose GraphAnchor, a novel Graph-Anchored Knowledge Indexing approach.<n> Experiments on four multi-hop question answering benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of GraphAnchor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-23T05:41:05Z) - RouteRAG: Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation from Text and Graph via Reinforcement Learning [69.87510139069218]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates non-parametric knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent progress has advanced text-based RAG to multi-turn reasoning through Reinforcement Learning (RL)<n>We introduce model, an RL-based framework that enables LLMs to perform multi-turn and adaptive graph-text hybrid RAG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T10:05:31Z) - TeaRAG: A Token-Efficient Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework [62.66056331998838]
TeaRAG is a token-efficient agentic RAG framework capable of compressing both retrieval content and reasoning steps.<n>Our reward function evaluates the knowledge sufficiency by a knowledge matching mechanism, while penalizing excessive reasoning steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-07T16:08:34Z) - Enrich-on-Graph: Query-Graph Alignment for Complex Reasoning with LLM Enriching [61.824094419641575]
Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with hallucinations and factual errors in knowledge-intensive scenarios like knowledge graph question answering (KGQA)<n>We attribute this to the semantic gap between structured knowledge graphs (KGs) and unstructured queries, caused by inherent differences in their focuses and structures.<n>Existing methods usually employ resource-intensive, non-scalable reasoning on vanilla KGs, but overlook this gap.<n>We propose a flexible framework, Enrich-on-Graph (EoG), which leverages LLMs' prior knowledge to enrich KGs, bridge the semantic gap between graphs and queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T06:48:52Z) - MIXRAG : Mixture-of-Experts Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Textual Graph Understanding and Question Answering [6.596018318578605]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources during inference.<n>Most existing approaches rely on a single retriever to identify relevant subgraphs, which limits their ability to capture diverse aspects of complex queries.<n>We propose MIXRAG, a Mixture-of-Experts Graph-RAG framework that introduces multiple specialized graph retrievers and a dynamic routing controller.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T02:44:57Z) - GRIL: Knowledge Graph Retrieval-Integrated Learning with Large Language Models [59.72897499248909]
We propose a novel graph retriever trained end-to-end with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Within the extracted subgraph, structural knowledge and semantic features are encoded via soft tokens and the verbalized graph, respectively, which are infused into the LLM together.<n>Our approach consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, validating the strength of joint graph-LLM optimization for complex reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T02:38:00Z) - Cross-Granularity Hypergraph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-hop Question Answering [49.43814054718318]
Multi-hop question answering (MHQA) requires integrating knowledge scattered across multiple passages to derive the correct answer.<n>Traditional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods primarily focus on coarse-grained textual semantic similarity.<n>We propose a novel RAG approach called HGRAG for MHQA that achieves cross-granularity integration of structural and semantic information via hypergraphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-15T06:36:13Z) - Query-Aware Graph Neural Networks for Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation [0.0]
We present a novel graph neural network architecture for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>Our approach constructs per-episode knowledge graphs that capture both sequential and semantic relationships between text chunks.<n>We introduce an Enhanced Graph Attention Network with query-guided pooling that dynamically focuses on relevant parts of the graph based on user queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-25T19:42:27Z) - Align-GRAG: Reasoning-Guided Dual Alignment for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation [79.75818239774952]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, but still struggle with issues like hallucinations and outdated information.<n>Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses these issues by grounding LLM outputs in external knowledge with an Information Retrieval (IR) system.<n>We propose Align-GRAG, a novel reasoning-guided dual alignment framework in post-retrieval phrase.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T05:15:27Z) - Divide by Question, Conquer by Agent: SPLIT-RAG with Question-Driven Graph Partitioning [18.96570718233786]
SPLIT-RAG is a multi-agent RAG framework that addresses the limitations with question-driven semantic graph partitioning and collaborative subgraph retrieval.<n>The innovative framework first create Semantic Partitioning of Linked Information, then use the Type-Specialized knowledge base to achieve Multi-Agent RAG.<n>The attribute-aware graph segmentation manages to divide knowledge graphs into semantically coherent subgraphs, ensuring subgraphs align with different query types.<n>A hierarchical merging module resolves inconsistencies across subgraph-derived answers through logical verifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T06:44:34Z) - Reasoning of Large Language Models over Knowledge Graphs with Super-Relations [53.14275361052276]
We propose the ReKnoS framework, which aims to Reason over Knowledge Graphs with Super-Relations.<n>Our framework's key advantages include the inclusion of multiple relation paths through super-relations.<n>The results demonstrate the superior performance of ReKnoS over existing state-of-the-art baselines, with an average accuracy gain of 2.92%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-28T06:11:04Z) - CG-RAG: Research Question Answering by Citation Graph Retrieval-Augmented LLMs [9.718354494802002]
Contextualized Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (CG-RAG) is a novel framework that integrates sparse and dense retrieval signals within graph structures.<n>First, we propose a contextual graph representation for citation graphs, effectively capturing both explicit and implicit connections within and across documents.<n>Second, we introduce Lexical-Semantic Graph Retrieval (LeSeGR), which seamlessly integrates sparse and dense retrieval signals with graph encoding.<n>Third, we present a context-aware generation strategy that utilizes the retrieved graph-structured information to generate precise and contextually enriched responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-25T04:18:08Z) - Harnessing Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Question Answering via Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-Augmentation [81.18701211912779]
We introduce an Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-augmented over KGs (Amar) framework.<n>This method retrieves knowledge including entities, relations, and subgraphs, and converts each piece of retrieved text into prompt embeddings.<n>Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance on two common datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-24T16:38:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.