SynQuE: Estimating Synthetic Dataset Quality Without Annotations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03928v1
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:09:33 GMT
- Title: SynQuE: Estimating Synthetic Dataset Quality Without Annotations
- Authors: Arthur Chen, Victor Zhong,
- Abstract summary: We formalize the problem of ranking synthetic datasets by their expected real-world task performance using only limited unannotated real data.<n>We establish the first comprehensive benchmarks for this problem by introducing proxy metrics that choose synthetic data for training to maximize task performance on real data.<n>Our results show that SynQuE proxies correlate with real task performance across diverse tasks, including sentiment analysis, Text2 navigation, web navigation, and image classification.
- Score: 6.628608274494256
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We introduce and formalize the Synthetic Dataset Quality Estimation (SynQuE) problem: ranking synthetic datasets by their expected real-world task performance using only limited unannotated real data. This addresses a critical and open challenge where data is scarce due to collection costs or privacy constraints. We establish the first comprehensive benchmarks for this problem by introducing and evaluating proxy metrics that choose synthetic data for training to maximize task performance on real data. We introduce the first proxy metrics for SynQuE by adapting distribution and diversity-based distance measures to our context via embedding models. To address the shortcomings of these metrics on complex planning tasks, we propose LENS, a novel proxy that leverages large language model reasoning. Our results show that SynQuE proxies correlate with real task performance across diverse tasks, including sentiment analysis, Text2SQL, web navigation, and image classification, with LENS consistently outperforming others on complex tasks by capturing nuanced characteristics. For instance, on text-to-SQL parsing, training on the top-3 synthetic datasets selected via SynQuE proxies can raise accuracy from 30.4% to 38.4 (+8.1)% on average compared to selecting data indiscriminately. This work establishes SynQuE as a practical framework for synthetic data selection under real-data scarcity and motivates future research on foundation model-based data characterization and fine-grained data selection.
Related papers
- What Is Wrong with Synthetic Data for Scene Text Recognition? A Strong Synthetic Engine with Diverse Simulations and Self-Evolution [21.806975276583174]
We introduce UnionST, a strong data engine that synthesizes text covering a union of challenging samples.<n>We then construct UnionST-S, a large-scale synthetic dataset with improved simulations in challenging scenarios.<n>Experiments show that models trained on UnionST-S achieve significant improvements over existing synthetic datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T07:23:54Z) - SDQM: Synthetic Data Quality Metric for Object Detection Dataset Evaluation [3.2150327776278576]
This paper introduces the Synthetic dataset Quality Metric (SDQM) to assess data quality for object detection tasks.<n>In our experiments, SDQM demonstrated a strong correlation with the mean Average Precision (mAP) scores of YOLOv11, a leading object detection model.<n>It provides actionable insights for improving dataset quality, minimizing the need for costly iterative training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-08T03:01:26Z) - Understanding the Influence of Synthetic Data for Text Embedders [52.04771455432998]
We first reproduce and publicly release the synthetic data proposed by Wang et al.<n>We critically examine where exactly synthetic data improves model generalization.<n>Our findings highlight the limitations of current synthetic data approaches for building general-purpose embedders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-07T19:28:52Z) - Valid Inference with Imperfect Synthetic Data [39.10587411316875]
We introduce a new estimator based on generalized method of moments.<n>We find that interactions between the moment residuals of synthetic data and those of real data can greatly improve estimates of the target parameter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-08T18:32:52Z) - Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Models [125.41600201811417]
We introduce SynthLLM, a scalable framework that transforms pre-training corpora into diverse, high-quality synthetic datasets.<n>Our approach achieves this by automatically extracting and recombining high-level concepts across multiple documents using a graph algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-25T11:07:12Z) - Generating Realistic Tabular Data with Large Language Models [49.03536886067729]
Large language models (LLM) have been used for diverse tasks, but do not capture the correct correlation between the features and the target variable.
We propose a LLM-based method with three important improvements to correctly capture the ground-truth feature-class correlation in the real data.
Our experiments show that our method significantly outperforms 10 SOTA baselines on 20 datasets in downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-29T04:14:32Z) - SynFER: Towards Boosting Facial Expression Recognition with Synthetic Data [78.70620682374624]
We introduce SynFER, a novel framework for synthesizing facial expression image data based on high-level textual descriptions.<n>To ensure the quality and reliability of the synthetic data, we propose a semantic guidance technique and a pseudo-label generator.<n>Results validate the efficacy of our approach and the synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-13T14:58:21Z) - Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmark [3.2968976262860408]
We investigate the effectiveness of generating synthetic data through large language models (LLMs)
Our experiments show that while synthetic data can effectively capture performance of various methods for simpler tasks, it falls short for more complex tasks like named entity recognition.
We propose a new metric called the bias factor, which evaluates the biases introduced when the same LLM is used to both generate benchmarking data and to perform the tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T13:20:23Z) - Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A
Comprehensive Benchmark [56.8042116967334]
Synthetic data serves as an alternative in training machine learning models.
ensuring that synthetic data mirrors the complex nuances of real-world data is a challenging task.
This paper explores the potential of integrating data-centric AI techniques to guide the synthetic data generation process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T20:32:02Z) - Exploring the Potential of AI-Generated Synthetic Datasets: A Case Study
on Telematics Data with ChatGPT [0.0]
This research delves into the construction and utilization of synthetic datasets, specifically within the telematics sphere, leveraging OpenAI's powerful language model, ChatGPT.
To illustrate this data creation process, a hands-on case study is conducted, focusing on the generation of a synthetic telematics dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T15:15:13Z) - Is Synthetic Dataset Reliable for Benchmarking Generalizable Person
Re-Identification? [1.1041211464412568]
We show that a recent large-scale synthetic dataset ClonedPerson can be reliably used to benchmark GPReID, statistically the same as real-world datasets.
This study guarantees the usage of synthetic datasets for both source training set and target testing set, with completely no privacy concerns from real-world surveillance data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-12T06:54:54Z) - TRoVE: Transforming Road Scene Datasets into Photorealistic Virtual
Environments [84.6017003787244]
This work proposes a synthetic data generation pipeline to address the difficulties and domain-gaps present in simulated datasets.
We show that using annotations and visual cues from existing datasets, we can facilitate automated multi-modal data generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-16T20:46:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.