SDQM: Synthetic Data Quality Metric for Object Detection Dataset Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06596v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 03:01:26 GMT
• Title: SDQM: Synthetic Data Quality Metric for Object Detection Dataset Evaluation
• Authors: Ayush Zenith, Arnold Zumbrun, Neel Raut, Jing Lin,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Synthetic dataset Quality Metric (SDQM) to assess data quality for object detection tasks.<n>In our experiments, SDQM demonstrated a strong correlation with the mean Average Precision (mAP) scores of YOLOv11, a leading object detection model.<n>It provides actionable insights for improving dataset quality, minimizing the need for costly iterative training.
• Score: 3.2150327776278576
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The performance of machine learning models depends heavily on training data. The scarcity of large-scale, well-annotated datasets poses significant challenges in creating robust models. To address this, synthetic data generated through simulations and generative models has emerged as a promising solution, enhancing dataset diversity and improving the performance, reliability, and resilience of models. However, evaluating the quality of this generated data requires an effective metric. This paper introduces the Synthetic Dataset Quality Metric (SDQM) to assess data quality for object detection tasks without requiring model training to converge. This metric enables more efficient generation and selection of synthetic datasets, addressing a key challenge in resource-constrained object detection tasks. In our experiments, SDQM demonstrated a strong correlation with the mean Average Precision (mAP) scores of YOLOv11, a leading object detection model, while previous metrics only exhibited moderate or weak correlations. Additionally, it provides actionable insights for improving dataset quality, minimizing the need for costly iterative training. This scalable and efficient metric sets a new standard for evaluating synthetic data. The code for SDQM is available at https://github.com/ayushzenith/SDQM

Related papers

• The LLM Data Auditor: A Metric-oriented Survey on Quality and Trustworthiness in Evaluating Synthetic Data [25.926467401802046]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for generating data across various modalities.<n>We propose a framework for evaluating synthetic data from two dimensions: quality and trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T06:40:25Z)
• Studying the Role of Synthetic Data for Machine Learning-based Wireless Networks Traffic Forecasting [1.1699027359021665]
  This paper proposes a novel method to generate synthetic data, based on first-order auto-regressive noise statistics, for large-scale Wi-Fi deployments.<n> Experimental results show that ML models trained on synthetic data achieve Mean Absolute Error (MAE) values within 10 to 15 of those obtained using real data.<n>When generalization is required, synthetic-data-trained models improve prediction accuracy by up to 50 percent compared to real-data-trained baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T15:27:55Z)
• RoHOI: Robustness Benchmark for Human-Object Interaction Detection [84.78366452133514]
  Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection is crucial for robot-human assistance, enabling context-aware support.<n>We introduce the first benchmark for HOI detection, evaluating model resilience under diverse challenges.<n>Our benchmark, RoHOI, includes 20 corruption types based on the HICO-DET and V-COCO datasets and a new robustness-focused metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T01:58:04Z)
• Fréchet Power-Scenario Distance: A Metric for Evaluating Generative AI Models across Multiple Time-Scales in Smart Grids [6.181846832560787]
  A key challenge in utilizing such synthetic data is how to assess the data quality produced from such generative models.<n>Traditional Euclidean distance-based metrics only reflect pair-wise relations between two individual samples.<n>We propose a novel metric based on the Fr'echet Distance estimated between two datasets in a learned feature space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T21:32:23Z)
• Less is More: Adaptive Coverage for Synthetic Training Data [20.136698279893857]
  This study introduces a novel sampling algorithm, based on the maximum coverage problem, to select a representative subset from a synthetically generated dataset.<n>Our results demonstrate that training a classifier on this contextually sampled subset achieves superior performance compared to training on the entire dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T06:45:16Z)
• LEMUR Neural Network Dataset: Towards Seamless AutoML [35.57280723615144]
  We introduce LEMUR, an open-source dataset and framework that provides a large collection of PyTorch-based neural networks.<n>Each model follows a unified template, with configurations and results stored in a structured database to ensure consistency.<n>LEMUR aims to accelerate AutoML research, enable fair benchmarking, and reduce barriers to large-scale neural network research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T09:08:00Z)
• Towards Robust Universal Information Extraction: Benchmark, Evaluation, and Solution [66.11004226578771]
  Existing robust benchmark datasets have two key limitations.<n>They generate only a limited range of perturbations for a single Information Extraction (IE) task.<n>Considering the powerful generation capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we introduce a new benchmark dataset for Robust UIE, called RUIE-Bench.<n>We show that training with only textbf15% of the data leads to an average textbf7.5% relative performance improvement across three IE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:39:29Z)
• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• Quality In / Quality Out: Data quality more relevant than model choice in anomaly detection with the UGR'16 [0.29998889086656577]
  We show that relatively minor modifications on a benchmark dataset cause significantly more impact on model performance than the specific ML technique considered.<n>We also show that the measured model performance is uncertain, as a result of labelling inaccuracies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T12:03:12Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Development [81.03754002516862]
  DataPerf is a community-led benchmark suite for evaluating ML datasets and data-centric algorithms. We provide an open, online platform with multiple rounds of challenges to support this iterative development. The benchmarks, online evaluation platform, and baseline implementations are open source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T17:47:54Z)
• Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
  We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples. We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models. We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.