LLMs and Cultural Values: the Impact of Prompt Language and Explicit Cultural Framing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03980v1
• Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 02:09:29 GMT
• Title: LLMs and Cultural Values: the Impact of Prompt Language and Explicit Cultural Framing
• Authors: Bram Bulté, Ayla Rigouts Terryn,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted by users across the globe, who interact with them in a diverse range of languages.<n>We examine how prompt language and cultural framing influence model responses and their alignment with human values in different countries.
• Score: 0.21485350418225244
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted by users across the globe, who interact with them in a diverse range of languages. At the same time, there are well-documented imbalances in the training data and optimisation objectives of this technology, raising doubts as to whether LLMs can represent the cultural diversity of their broad user base. In this study, we look at LLMs and cultural values and examine how prompt language and cultural framing influence model responses and their alignment with human values in different countries. We probe 10 LLMs with 63 items from the Hofstede Values Survey Module and World Values Survey, translated into 11 languages, and formulated as prompts with and without different explicit cultural perspectives. Our study confirms that both prompt language and cultural perspective produce variation in LLM outputs, but with an important caveat: While targeted prompting can, to a certain extent, steer LLM responses in the direction of the predominant values of the corresponding countries, it does not overcome the models' systematic bias toward the values associated with a restricted set of countries in our dataset: the Netherlands, Germany, the US, and Japan. All tested models, regardless of their origin, exhibit remarkably similar patterns: They produce fairly neutral responses on most topics, with selective progressive stances on issues such as social tolerance. Alignment with cultural values of human respondents is improved more with an explicit cultural perspective than with a targeted prompt language. Unexpectedly, combining both approaches is no more effective than cultural framing with an English prompt. These findings reveal that LLMs occupy an uncomfortable middle ground: They are responsive enough to changes in prompts to produce variation, but too firmly anchored to specific cultural defaults to adequately represent cultural diversity.

Related papers

• MMA-ASIA: A Multilingual and Multimodal Alignment Framework for Culturally-Grounded Evaluation [91.22008265721952]
  MMA-ASIA centers on a human-curated, multilingual, and multimodally aligned benchmark covering 8 Asian countries and 10 languages.<n>This is the first dataset aligned at the input level across three modalities: text, image (visual question answering), and speech.<n>We propose a five-dimensional evaluation protocol that measures: (i) cultural-awareness disparities across countries, (ii) cross-lingual consistency, (iii) cross-modal consistency, (iv) cultural knowledge generalization, and (v) grounding validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T14:12:12Z)
• Cross-Cultural Transfer of Commonsense Reasoning in LLMs: Evidence from the Arab World [68.19795061447044]
  This paper investigates cross-cultural transfer of commonsense reasoning in the Arab world.<n>Using a culturally grounded commonsense reasoning dataset covering 13 Arab countries, we evaluate lightweight alignment methods.<n>Our results show that merely 12 culture-specific examples from one country can improve performance in others by 10% on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T17:24:14Z)
• From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias in LLMs via Word Association Test [50.51344198689069]
  We extend the human-centered word association test (WAT) to assess the alignment of large language models with cross-cultural cognition.<n>To address culture preference, we propose CultureSteer, an innovative approach by embedding cultural-specific semantic associations directly within the model's internal representation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T07:05:10Z)
• From Surveys to Narratives: Rethinking Cultural Value Adaptation in LLMs [62.9861554207279]
  Adapting cultural values in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents significant challenges.<n>Prior work primarily aligns LLMs with different cultural values using World Values Survey (WVS) data.<n>We investigate WVS-based training for cultural value adaptation and find that relying solely on survey data cane cultural norms and interfere with factual knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:00:01Z)
• Localized Cultural Knowledge is Conserved and Controllable in Large Language Models [20.411764699679058]
  We show that explicitly providing cultural context in prompts significantly improves the models' ability to generate culturally localized responses.<n>Despite the explicit prompting benefit, however, the answers reduce in diversity and tend toward stereotypes.<n>We identify an explicit cultural customization vector, conserved across all non-English languages, which enables LLMs to be steered from the synthetic English cultural world-model toward each non-English cultural world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T12:53:58Z)
• An Evaluation of Cultural Value Alignment in LLM [27.437888319382893]
  We conduct the first large-scale evaluation of LLM culture assessing 20 countries' cultures and languages across ten LLMs.<n>Our findings show that the output over all models represents a moderate cultural middle ground.<n> Deeper investigation sheds light on the influence of model origin, prompt language, and value dimensions on cultural output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T09:13:19Z)
• Cultural Learning-Based Culture Adaptation of Language Models [70.1063219524999]
  Adapting large language models (LLMs) to diverse cultural values is a challenging task.<n>We present CLCA, a novel framework for enhancing LLM alignment with cultural values based on cultural learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T18:16:26Z)
• Self-Pluralising Culture Alignment for Large Language Models [36.689491885394034]
  We propose CultureSPA, a framework that allows large language models to align to pluralistic cultures. By comparing culture-aware/unaware outputs, we are able to detect and collect culture-related instances. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CultureSPA significantly improves the alignment of LLMs to diverse cultures without compromising general abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T19:06:08Z)
• Self-Alignment: Improving Alignment of Cultural Values in LLMs via In-Context Learning [20.24633389489255]
  We present a simple and inexpensive method that uses a combination of in-context learning (ICL) and human survey data.<n>We show that our method could prove useful in test languages other than English and can improve alignment to the cultural values that correspond to a range of culturally diverse countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T12:18:04Z)
• How Well Do LLMs Represent Values Across Cultures? Empirical Analysis of LLM Responses Based on Hofstede Cultural Dimensions [9.275967682881944]
  It is critical to understand whether Large Language Models showcase different values to the user based on the stereotypical values of a user's known country.<n>We prompt different LLMs with a series of advice requests based on 5 Hofstede Cultural Dimensions.<n>We found that LLMs can differentiate between one side of a value and another, as well as understand that countries have differing values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T00:58:01Z)
• CULTURE-GEN: Revealing Global Cultural Perception in Language Models through Natural Language Prompting [73.94059188347582]
  We uncover culture perceptions of three SOTA models on 110 countries and regions on 8 culture-related topics through culture-conditioned generations. We discover that culture-conditioned generation consist of linguistic "markers" that distinguish marginalized cultures apart from default cultures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T00:50:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.