Probing the Probes: Methods and Metrics for Concept Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04312v1
• Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 12:34:05 GMT
• Title: Probing the Probes: Methods and Metrics for Concept Alignment
• Abstract summary: It is widely assumed that a high probe accuracy indicates a CAV faithfully representing its target concept.<n>We show that the probe's classification accuracy alone is an unreliable measure of concept alignment.<n>We introduce a novel concept localization method based on spatial linear attribution.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In explainable AI, Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) are typically obtained by training linear classifier probes to detect human-understandable concepts as directions in the activation space of deep neural networks. It is widely assumed that a high probe accuracy indicates a CAV faithfully representing its target concept. However, we show that the probe's classification accuracy alone is an unreliable measure of concept alignment, i.e., the degree to which a CAV captures the intended concept. In fact, we argue that probes are more likely to capture spurious correlations than they are to represent only the intended concept. As part of our analysis, we demonstrate that deliberately misaligned probes constructed to exploit spurious correlations, achieve an accuracy close to that of standard probes. To address this severe problem, we introduce a novel concept localization method based on spatial linear attribution, and provide a comprehensive comparison of it to existing feature visualization techniques for detecting and mitigating concept misalignment. We further propose three classes of metrics for quantitatively assessing concept alignment: hard accuracy, segmentation scores, and augmentation robustness. Our analysis shows that probes with translation invariance and spatial alignment consistently increase concept alignment. These findings highlight the need for alignment-based evaluation metrics rather than probe accuracy, and the importance of tailoring probes to both the model architecture and the nature of the target concept.

Related papers

• Interpreting Object-Dependent Concept Brittleness in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [105.53190946111586]
  We term this phenomenon object-dependent concept brittleness.<n>We present an interpretability-oriented framework to audit and minimally correct these failures.<n>We evaluate the proposed framework on style and attribute failure cases across multiple diffusion backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T09:07:40Z)
• How Do Linear Probes Emerge? A Circuit-Tracing Framework with Concept-Targeted Attribution [49.01642339390897]
  Concept-Targeted Attribution (CTA) trains attribution graphs with respect to a linear probe direction.<n>We show that CTA yields probe-specific circuits that explain why an internal concept representation arises in a prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T08:12:49Z)
• Structuring Semantic Embeddings for Principle Evaluation: A Prototype-Guided Contrastive Learning Approach [58.15427952222424]
  General-purpose text embeddings are widely deployed for such tasks, but broad semantic similarity can place semantically similar yet task-distinct examples.<n>We introduce Prototype-Guided Contrastive Learning (PGCL), a prototype-guided geometric regularization module built on top of frozen text embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-15T13:19:25Z)
• On the Faithfulness of Post-Hoc Concept Bottleneck Models [7.774981803358894]
  We study Post-Hoc Concept Bottleneck Models (post-hoc CBMs)<n>CBMs project latent features onto interpretable concept spaces using auxiliary datasets or vision-language models.<n>For example, random concept projections can achieve competitive accuracy despite being semantically meaningless.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T16:02:29Z)
• Rethinking Concept Bottleneck Models: From Pitfalls to Solutions [53.84388497227224]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground predictions in human-understandable concepts.<n>CBM-Suite is a methodological framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T19:37:49Z)
• Binary Flow Matching: Prediction-Loss Space Alignment for Robust Learning [23.616336786063552]
  Flow matching has emerged as a powerful framework for generative modeling.<n>We identify a latent structural mismatch that arises when it is coupled with velocity-based objectives.<n>We prove that re-aligning the objective to the signal space eliminates the singular weighting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T02:02:30Z)
• Building Better Deception Probes Using Targeted Instruction Pairs [1.610762469264735]
  Linear probes are a promising approach for monitoring AI systems for deceptive behaviour.<n>In this paper, we identify the importance of the instruction pair used during training.<n>We show that targeting specific deceptive behaviors through a human-interpretable taxonomy of deception leads to improved results on evaluation datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T20:18:11Z)
• Ambiguity-aware Point Cloud Segmentation by Adaptive Margin Contrastive Learning [65.94127546086156]
  We propose an adaptive margin contrastive learning method for semantic segmentation on point clouds.<n>We first design AMContrast3D, a method comprising contrastive learning into an ambiguity estimation framework.<n>Inspired by the insight of joint training, we propose AMContrast3D++ integrating with two branches trained in parallel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T07:00:32Z)
• Uncovering Unique Concept Vectors through Latent Space Decomposition [0.0]
  Concept-based explanations have emerged as a superior approach that is more interpretable than feature attribution estimates. We propose a novel post-hoc unsupervised method that automatically uncovers the concepts learned by deep models during training. Our experiments reveal that the majority of our concepts are readily understandable to humans, exhibit coherency, and bear relevance to the task at hand.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T17:21:54Z)
• Learning Classifiers of Prototypes and Reciprocal Points for Universal Domain Adaptation [79.62038105814658]
  Universal Domain aims to transfer the knowledge between datasets by handling two shifts: domain-shift and categoryshift. Main challenge is correctly distinguishing the unknown target samples while adapting the distribution of known class knowledge from source to target. Most existing methods approach this problem by first training the target adapted known and then relying on the single threshold to distinguish unknown target samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T09:01:57Z)
• Measuring the Interpretability of Unsupervised Representations via Quantized Reverse Probing [97.70862116338554]
  We investigate the problem of measuring interpretability of self-supervised representations. We formulate the latter as estimating the mutual information between the representation and a space of manually labelled concepts. We use our method to evaluate a large number of self-supervised representations, ranking them by interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-07T16:18:50Z)
• Exploring Concept Contribution Spatially: Hidden Layer Interpretation with Spatial Activation Concept Vector [5.873416857161077]
  Testing with Concept Activation Vector (TCAV) presents a powerful tool to quantify the contribution of query concepts to a target class. For some images where the target object only occupies a small fraction of the region, TCAV evaluation may be interfered with by redundant background features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T15:58:57Z)
• Navigating Neural Space: Revisiting Concept Activation Vectors to Overcome Directional Divergence [13.618809162030486]
  Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) have emerged as a popular tool for modeling human-understandable concepts in the latent space.<n>In this paper we show that such a separability-oriented leads to solutions, which may diverge from the actual goal of precisely modeling the concept direction.<n>We introduce pattern-based CAVs, solely focussing on concept signals, thereby providing more accurate concept directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T19:40:20Z)
• Meta Learning Low Rank Covariance Factors for Energy-Based Deterministic Uncertainty [58.144520501201995]
  Bi-Lipschitz regularization of neural network layers preserve relative distances between data instances in the feature spaces of each layer. With the use of an attentive set encoder, we propose to meta learn either diagonal or diagonal plus low-rank factors to efficiently construct task specific covariance matrices. We also propose an inference procedure which utilizes scaled energy to achieve a final predictive distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T22:04:19Z)
• CertainNet: Sampling-free Uncertainty Estimation for Object Detection [65.28989536741658]
  Estimating the uncertainty of a neural network plays a fundamental role in safety-critical settings. In this work, we propose a novel sampling-free uncertainty estimation method for object detection. We call it CertainNet, and it is the first to provide separate uncertainties for each output signal: objectness, class, location and size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T17:59:31Z)
• Scope Head for Accurate Localization in Object Detection [135.9979405835606]
  We propose a novel detector coined as ScopeNet, which models anchors of each location as a mutually dependent relationship. With our concise and effective design, the proposed ScopeNet achieves state-of-the-art results on COCO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-11T04:00:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.