Does AI-Assisted Coding Deliver? A Difference-in-Differences Study of Cursor's Impact on Software Projects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04427v2
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 01:51:08 GMT
• Title: Does AI-Assisted Coding Deliver? A Difference-in-Differences Study of Cursor's Impact on Software Projects
• Authors: Hao He, Courtney Miller, Shyam Agarwal, Christian Kästner, Bogdan Vasilescu,
• Abstract summary: We find that the adoption of Cursor leads to a significant, large, but transient increase in project-level development velocity.<n>The increase in static analysis warnings and code complexity acts as a major factor causing long-term velocity slowdown.
• Score: 18.271710138834536
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the promise to revolutionize the field of software engineering. Among other things, LLM agents are rapidly gaining momentum in their application to software development, with practitioners claiming a multifold productivity increase after adoption. Yet, empirical evidence is lacking around these claims. In this paper, we estimate the causal effect of adopting a widely popular LLM agent assistant, namely Cursor, on development velocity and software quality. The estimation is enabled by a state-of-the-art difference-in-differences design comparing Cursor-adopting GitHub projects with a matched control group of similar GitHub projects that do not use Cursor. We find that the adoption of Cursor leads to a significant, large, but transient increase in project-level development velocity, along with a significant and persistent increase in static analysis warnings and code complexity. Further panel generalized method of moments estimation reveals that the increase in static analysis warnings and code complexity acts as a major factor causing long-term velocity slowdown. Our study carries implications for software engineering practitioners, LLM agent assistant designers, and researchers.

Related papers

• AI IDEs or Autonomous Agents? Measuring the Impact of Coding Agents on Software Development [12.50615284537175]
  Large language model (LLM) based coding agents increasingly act as autonomous contributors that generate and merge pull requests.<n>We present a longitudinal causal study of agent adoption in open-source repositories using staggered difference-in-differences with matched controls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T04:51:56Z)
• Evolving with AI: A Longitudinal Analysis of Developer Logs [3.7353323067733473]
  We study how sustained AI use reshapes actual daily coding practices in the long term.<n>We analyze five dimensions of workflow change: productivity, code quality, code editing, code reuse, and context switching.<n>Our results offer empirical insights into the silent restructuring of software and provide implications for designing future AI-augmented tooling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T10:30:24Z)
• From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Practical Guide to Code Intelligence [150.3696990310269]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed automated software development by enabling direct translation of natural language descriptions into functional code.<n>We provide a comprehensive synthesis and practical guide (a series of analytic and probing experiments) about code LLMs.<n>We analyze the code capability of the general LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA) and code-specialized LLMs (StarCoder, Code LLaMA, DeepSeek-Coder, and QwenCoder)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T17:09:34Z)
• The Matthew Effect of AI Programming Assistants: A Hidden Bias in Software Evolution [7.753573982185398]
  We conduct large-scale experiments on thousands of algorithmic programming tasks and hundreds of framework selection tasks to investigate how AI-assisted programming interacts with the software ecosystem.<n>Our analysis reveals textbfa striking Matthew effect: the more popular a programming language or framework, the higher the success rate of LLM-generated code.<n>The phenomenon suggests that AI systems may reinforce existing popularity hierarchies, accelerating convergence around dominant tools while hindering diversity and innovation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T11:30:17Z)
• On Integrating Large Language Models and Scenario-Based Programming for Improving Software Reliability [2.2058293096044586]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are fast becoming indispensable tools for software developers.<n>LLMs often introduce significant errors and present incorrect code with persuasive confidence.<n>We propose a methodology for combining LLMs with traditional'' software engineering techniques in a structured way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T07:10:25Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Machine Learning Engineering Agents [52.03168614623642]
  We show that agents backed by weaker models that improve via reinforcement learning can outperform agents backed by much larger, but static models.<n>We propose duration- aware gradient updates in a distributed asynchronous RL framework to amplify high-cost but high-reward actions.<n>We also propose environment instrumentation to offer partial credit, distinguishing almost-correct programs from those that fail early.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T18:04:10Z)
• Augmenting Large Language Models with Static Code Analysis for Automated Code Quality Improvements [0.36832029288386137]
  This study examined code issue detection and revision automation by integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into software development.<n>A static code analysis framework detects issues such as bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells within a large-scale software project.<n>Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is implemented to enhance the relevance and precision of the revisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T03:39:25Z)
• Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
  We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
• LLMs' Reshaping of People, Processes, Products, and Society in Software Development: A Comprehensive Exploration with Early Adopters [3.4069804433026314]
  Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and GitHub Copilot are rapidly gaining traction in the software industry.<n>Our study provides a nuanced understanding of how LLMs are shaping the landscape of software development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T22:27:05Z)
• Efficiency Unleashed: Inference Acceleration for LLM-based Recommender Systems with Speculative Decoding [61.45448947483328]
  We introduce Lossless Acceleration via Speculative Decoding for LLM-based Recommender Systems (LASER)<n>LASER features a Customized Retrieval Pool to enhance retrieval efficiency and Relaxed Verification to improve the acceptance rate of draft tokens.<n>LASER achieves a 3-5x speedup on public datasets and saves about 67% of computational resources during the online A/B test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-11T02:31:13Z)
• Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
  This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation. We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z)
• AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvement [8.66280420062806]
  We propose an automated approach for solving GitHub issues to autonomously achieve program improvement. In our approach called AutoCodeRover, LLMs are combined with sophisticated code search capabilities, ultimately leading to a program modification or patch. Experiments on SWE-bench-lite (300 real-life GitHub issues) show increased efficacy in solving GitHub issues (19% on SWE-bench-lite), which is higher than the efficacy of the recently reported SWE-agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T11:55:09Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study [72.24266814625685]
  We explore the performance of large language models (LLMs) across the entire software development lifecycle with DevEval.<n>DevEval features four programming languages, multiple domains, high-quality data collection, and carefully designed and verified metrics for each task.<n> Empirical studies show that current LLMs, including GPT-4, fail to solve the challenges presented within DevEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T15:13:44Z)
• Experiential Co-Learning of Software-Developing Agents [83.34027623428096]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant changes to various domains, especially in software development. We introduce Experiential Co-Learning, a novel LLM-agent learning framework. Experiments demonstrate that the framework enables agents to tackle unseen software-developing tasks more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T13:50:42Z)
• ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development [84.90400377131962]
  ChatDev is a chat-powered software development framework in which specialized agents are guided in what to communicate. These agents actively contribute to the design, coding, and testing phases through unified language-based communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T02:11:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.