On the impact of semantic transparency on understanding and reviewing social goal models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06110v1
• Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 19:24:37 GMT
• Title: On the impact of semantic transparency on understanding and reviewing social goal models
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the impact of semantic transparency on understanding and reviewing i* models.<n>We asked 57 novice participants to perform understanding and reviewing tasks on i* models.<n>We found no evidence of improved accuracy or speed attributable to the alternative concrete syntax.
• Score: 1.290443040184784
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Context: i* is one of the most influential languages in the Requirements Engineering research community. Perhaps due to its complexity and low adoption in industry, it became a natural candidate for studies aiming at improving its concrete syntax and the stakeholders' ability to correctly interpret i* models. Objectives: We evaluate the impact of semantic transparency on understanding and reviewing i* models, in the presence of a language key. Methods: We performed a quasi-experiment comparing the standard i* concrete syntax with an alternative that has an increased semantic transparency. We asked 57 novice participants to perform understanding and reviewing tasks on i* models, and measured their accuracy, speed and ease, using metrics of task success, time and effort, collected with eye-tracking and participants' feedback. Results: We found no evidence of improved accuracy or speed attributable to the alternative concrete syntax. Although participants' perceived ease was similar, they devoted significantly less visual effort to the model and the provided language key, when using the alternative concrete syntax. Conclusions: The context provided by the model and language key may mitigate the i* symbol recognition deficit reported in previous works. However, the alternative concrete syntax required a significantly lower visual effort.

Related papers

• Evaluating the encoding competence of visual language models using uncommon actions [5.816389980109022]
  UAIT is a new evaluation benchmark designed to test the semantic understanding ability of visual language models (VLMs) in uncommon-sense action scenes.<n>We synthesize high-quality uncommon-sense image-text samples using large language models, few-shot prompt engineering, and text-to-image generation.<n>We evaluate multiple state-of-the-art visual language models and compare them with models based on contrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T17:15:45Z)
• Context Matters: Learning Global Semantics via Object-Centric Representation [8.195437248815802]
  Vision models have yet to exhibit comparable progress in in-context learning.<n>We argue that this gap could stem from the lack of semantic and contextual guidance in current vision transformer (ViT) training schemes.<n>We propose to directly model "object" as the visual equivalence of "word," pushing the model to learn the global context and semantics among visual elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T08:33:36Z)
• Text Embeddings Should Capture Implicit Semantics, Not Just Surface Meaning [17.00358234728804]
  We argue that the text embedding research community should move beyond surface meaning and embrace implicit semantics as a central modeling goal.<n>Current embedding models are typically trained on data that lacks such depth and evaluated on benchmarks that reward the capture of surface meaning.<n>Our pilot study highlights this gap, showing that even state-of-the-art models perform only marginally better than simplistic baselines on implicit semantics tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T02:11:42Z)
• Syntax and Semantics Meet in the "Middle": Probing the Syntax-Semantics Interface of LMs Through Agentivity [68.8204255655161]
  We present the semantic notion of agentivity as a case study for probing such interactions. This suggests LMs may potentially serve as more useful tools for linguistic annotation, theory testing, and discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T16:24:01Z)
• Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blinds [59.71218039095155]
  We evaluate language understanding capacities on simple inference tasks that most humans find trivial. We target (i) grammatically-specified entailments, (ii) premises with evidential adverbs of uncertainty, and (iii) monotonicity entailments. The models exhibit moderate to low performance on these evaluation sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:41:09Z)
• Towards explainable evaluation of language models on the semantic similarity of visual concepts [0.0]
  We examine the behavior of high-performing pre-trained language models, focusing on the task of semantic similarity for visual vocabularies. First, we address the need for explainable evaluation metrics, necessary for understanding the conceptual quality of retrieved instances. Secondly, adversarial interventions on salient query semantics expose vulnerabilities of opaque metrics and highlight patterns in learned linguistic representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T11:40:57Z)
• Dependency Induction Through the Lens of Visual Perception [81.91502968815746]
  We propose an unsupervised grammar induction model that leverages word concreteness and a structural vision-based to jointly learn constituency-structure and dependency-structure grammars. Our experiments show that the proposed extension outperforms the current state-of-the-art visually grounded models in constituency parsing even with a smaller grammar size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T18:40:37Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)
• Introducing Syntactic Structures into Target Opinion Word Extraction with Deep Learning [89.64620296557177]
  We propose to incorporate the syntactic structures of the sentences into the deep learning models for targeted opinion word extraction. We also introduce a novel regularization technique to improve the performance of the deep learning models. The proposed model is extensively analyzed and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on four benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T07:13:17Z)
• Probing Contextual Language Models for Common Ground with Visual Representations [76.05769268286038]
  We design a probing model that evaluates how effective are text-only representations in distinguishing between matching and non-matching visual representations. Our findings show that language representations alone provide a strong signal for retrieving image patches from the correct object categories. Visually grounded language models slightly outperform text-only language models in instance retrieval, but greatly under-perform humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:28:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.