Slaying the Dragon: The Quest for Democracy in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09263v1
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 01:43:12 GMT
- Title: Slaying the Dragon: The Quest for Democracy in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)
- Authors: Stefano Balietti, Pietro Saggese, Stefan Kitzler, Bernhard Haslhofer,
- Abstract summary: Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are a novel institutional form based on blockchain technology.<n>They aim to redistribute decision-making power through programmable, transparent, and participatory mechanisms.<n>This chapter outlines both the opportunities and challenges they face, including token concentration, low participation, and the risk of de facto centralization.
- Score: 0.2449909275410288
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This chapter explores how Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), a novel institutional form based on blockchain technology, challenge traditional centralized governance structures. DAOs govern projects ranging from finance to science and digital communities. They aim to redistribute decision-making power through programmable, transparent, and participatory mechanisms. This chapter outlines both the opportunities DAOs present, such as incentive alignment, rapid coordination, and censorship resistance, and the challenges they face, including token concentration, low participation, and the risk of de facto centralization. It further discusses the emerging intersection of DAOs and artificial intelligence, highlighting the potential for increased automation alongside the dangers of diminished human oversight and algorithmic opacity. Ultimately, we discuss under what circumstances DAOs can fulfill their democratic promise or risk replicating the very power asymmetries they seek to overcome.
Related papers
- When Autonomy Goes Rogue: Preparing for Risks of Multi-Agent Collusion in Social Systems [78.04679174291329]
We introduce a proof-of-concept to simulate the risks of malicious multi-agent systems (MAS)<n>We apply this framework to two high-risk fields: misinformation spread and e-commerce fraud.<n>Our findings show that decentralized systems are more effective at carrying out malicious actions than centralized ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-19T15:17:30Z) - Trustworthy Decentralized Autonomous Machines: A New Paradigm in Automation Economy [45.55770948876387]
Decentralized Autonomous Machines (DAMs) are capable of managing both digital and physical assets.<n>We argue that DAMs are pivotal in transitioning from trust-based to trustless economic models.<n>The integration of AI-driven decision-making, IoT-enabled operational autonomy, and blockchain-based governance allows DAMs to decentralize ownership, optimize resource allocation, and democratize access to economic opportunities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-22T07:59:46Z) - Decentralized Governance of Autonomous AI Agents [0.0]
ETHOS is a decentralized governance (DeGov) model leveraging Web3 technologies, including blockchain, smart contracts, and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs)<n>It establishes a global registry for AI agents, enabling dynamic risk classification, proportional oversight, and automated compliance monitoring.<n>By integrating philosophical principles of rationality, ethical grounding, and goal alignment, ETHOS aims to create a robust research agenda for promoting trust, transparency, and participatory governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T18:01:49Z) - Protocol Learning, Decentralized Frontier Risk and the No-Off Problem [56.74434512241989]
We identify a third paradigm - Protocol Learning - where models are trained across decentralized networks of incentivized participants.<n>This approach has the potential to aggregate orders of magnitude more computational resources than any single centralized entity.<n>It also introduces novel challenges: heterogeneous and unreliable nodes, malicious participants, the need for unextractable models to preserve incentives, and complex governance dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-10T19:53:50Z) - Hybrid-DAOs: Enhancing Governance, Scalability, and Compliance in Decentralized Systems [30.983041162098303]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are emerging governance protocols that enable decentralized community management without a central authority.
They face challenges regarding scalability, governance, and compliance.
Hybrid-DAOs combine the decentralized nature ofs with traditional legal frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T22:56:19Z) - Future of Algorithmic Organization: Large-Scale Analysis of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) [45.02792904507959]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) resemble early online communities, particularly those centered around open-source projects.
In just a few years, the deployment of governance tokens surged with a total of $24.5 billion and 11.1M governance token holders collectively managing decisions across over 13,000s as of 2024.
We examine factors such as voting power, participation, and characteristics dictating the level of decentralization, thus, the efficiency of management structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T23:45:10Z) - DAOs of Collective Intelligence? Unraveling the Complexity of Blockchain Governance in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations [0.7499722271664144]
Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) have transformed organizational structures by shifting from traditional control to decentralized approaches.<n>Despite managing significant funds and building global networks, hierarchicals face challenges like declining participation, increasing centralization, and inabilities to adapt to changing environments.<n>This paper explores complex systems and applies complexity science to explain their inefficiencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-03T12:06:15Z) - Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI.
compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation.
naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z) - Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in
Practice [54.47385318258732]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision.
In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research.
Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-17T01:30:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.