MINDS: A Cross-cultural Dialogue Corpus for Social Norm Classification and Adherence Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09918v1
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 01:18:42 GMT
- Title: MINDS: A Cross-cultural Dialogue Corpus for Social Norm Classification and Adherence Detection
- Authors: Pritish Sahu, Anirudh Som, Dimitra Vergyri, Ajay Divakaran,
- Abstract summary: We present Norm-RAG, a retrieval-augmented, agentic framework for nuanced social norm inference in multi-turn dialogues.<n>Our experiments show that Norm-RAG improves norm detection and generalization, demonstrates improved performance for culturally adaptive and socially intelligent dialogue systems.
- Score: 8.551627762137928
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Social norms are implicit, culturally grounded expectations that guide interpersonal communication. Unlike factual commonsense, norm reasoning is subjective, context-dependent, and varies across cultures, posing challenges for computational models. Prior works provide valuable normative annotations but mostly target isolated utterances or synthetic dialogues, limiting their ability to capture the fluid, multi-turn nature of real-world conversations. In this work, we present Norm-RAG, a retrieval-augmented, agentic framework for nuanced social norm inference in multi-turn dialogues. Norm-RAG models utterance-level attributes including communicative intent, speaker roles, interpersonal framing, and linguistic cues and grounds them in structured normative documentation retrieved via a novel Semantic Chunking approach. This enables interpretable and context-aware reasoning about norm adherence and violation across multilingual dialogues. We further introduce MINDS (Multilingual Interactions with Norm-Driven Speech), a bilingual dataset comprising 31 multi-turn Mandarin-English and Spanish-English conversations. Each turn is annotated for norm category and adherence status using multi-annotator consensus, reflecting cross-cultural and realistic norm expression. Our experiments show that Norm-RAG improves norm detection and generalization, demonstrates improved performance for culturally adaptive and socially intelligent dialogue systems.
Related papers
- Taxonomy of User Needs and Actions [51.86289485979439]
The growing ubiquity of conversational AI highlights the need for frameworks that capture users' instrumental goals and the situated, adaptive, and social practices through which they achieve them.<n>To address this gap, we introduce the Taxonomy of User Needs and Actions (TUNA), an empirically grounded framework developed through iterative qualitative analysis of 1193 human-AI conversations.<n> TUNA organizes user actions into a three-level hierarchy encompassing behaviors associated with information seeking, synthesis, procedural guidance, content creation, social interaction, and meta-conversation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T17:04:42Z) - NormGenesis: Multicultural Dialogue Generation via Exemplar-Guided Social Norm Modeling and Violation Recovery [4.701242219264098]
We present NormGenesis, a framework for generating socially grounded dialogues in English, Chinese, and Korean.<n>We propose a novel dialogue type, Violation-to-Resolution (V2R), which models the progression of conversations following norm violations through recognition and socially appropriate repair.<n>We show that models trained on our V2R-augmented data exhibit improved pragmatic competence in ethically sensitive contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-22T20:29:25Z) - Aligning Spoken Dialogue Models from User Interactions [55.192134724622235]
We propose a novel preference alignment framework to improve spoken dialogue models on realtime conversations from user interactions.<n>We create a dataset of more than 150,000 preference pairs from raw multi-turn speech conversations annotated with AI feedback.<n>Our findings shed light on the importance of a well-calibrated balance among various dynamics, crucial for natural real-time speech dialogue systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T16:45:20Z) - Cross-linguistic disagreement as a conflict of semantic alignment norms in multilingual AI~Linguistic Diversity as a Problem for Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and AI~ [0.2443066828522608]
Cross-linguistic consistency (CL-consistency) seeks universal concepts across languages.<n>Folk-consistency, which respects language-specific semantic norms.<n>Findings challenge assumption that universal representations and cross-linguistic transfer capabilities are inherently desirable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-01T03:31:40Z) - Scalable Frame-based Construction of Sociocultural NormBases for Socially-Aware Dialogues [66.69453609603875]
Sociocultural norms serve as guiding principles for personal conduct in social interactions.
We propose a scalable approach for constructing a Sociocultural Norm (SCN) Base using Large Language Models (LLMs)
We construct a comprehensive and publicly accessible Chinese Sociocultural NormBase.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T00:08:46Z) - "Hiding in Plain Sight": Designing Synthetic Dialog Generation for Uncovering Socially Situated Norms [19.91823526731224]
This paper proposes a framework for controlled generation of dialogues, spanning a wide range of interlocutors attributes.
We use this framework to generate NormHint, a collection of dialogues consistent with rich settings and analyzed for norm violation leading to conflicts.
We show it captures a wide range of conversational topics and scored highly by humans for the naturalness of the conversations based on the prompted context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T18:38:23Z) - NormDial: A Comparable Bilingual Synthetic Dialog Dataset for Modeling
Social Norm Adherence and Violation [18.605252945314724]
We present a high-quality dyadic dialogue dataset with turn-by-turn annotations of social norm adherences and violations for Chinese and American cultures.
Our dataset is synthetically generated in both Chinese and English using a human-in-the-loop pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T04:38:34Z) - BabySLM: language-acquisition-friendly benchmark of self-supervised
spoken language models [56.93604813379634]
Self-supervised techniques for learning speech representations have been shown to develop linguistic competence from exposure to speech without the need for human labels.
We propose a language-acquisition-friendly benchmark to probe spoken language models at the lexical and syntactic levels.
We highlight two exciting challenges that need to be addressed for further progress: bridging the gap between text and speech and between clean speech and in-the-wild speech.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-02T12:54:38Z) - Sociocultural Norm Similarities and Differences via Situational
Alignment and Explainable Textual Entailment [31.929550141633218]
We propose a novel approach to discover and compare social norms across Chinese and American cultures.
We build a high-quality dataset of 3,069 social norms aligned with social situations across Chinese and American cultures.
To test the ability of models to reason about social norms across cultures, we introduce the task of explainable social norm entailment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T19:43:47Z) - NormSAGE: Multi-Lingual Multi-Cultural Norm Discovery from Conversations
On-the-Fly [61.77957329364812]
We introduce a framework for addressing the novel task of conversation-grounded multi-lingual, multi-cultural norm discovery.
NormSAGE elicits knowledge about norms through directed questions representing the norm discovery task and conversation context.
It further addresses the risk of language model hallucination with a self-verification mechanism ensuring that the norms discovered are correct.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-16T18:30:05Z) - Ethical-Advice Taker: Do Language Models Understand Natural Language
Interventions? [62.74872383104381]
We investigate the effectiveness of natural language interventions for reading-comprehension systems.
We propose a new language understanding task, Linguistic Ethical Interventions (LEI), where the goal is to amend a question-answering (QA) model's unethical behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-02T20:57:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.