Modeling and Predicting Multi-Turn Answer Instability in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10688v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 01:48:23 GMT
• Title: Modeling and Predicting Multi-Turn Answer Instability in Large Language Models
• Authors: Jiahang He, Rishi Ramachandran, Neel Ramachandran, Aryan Katakam, Kevin Zhu, Sunishchal Dev, Ashwinee Panda, Aryan Shrivastava,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are adopted in an increasingly wide range of applications.<n>This paper employs simple multi-turn follow-up prompts to evaluate models' answer changes.<n>We find that a simple "Think again" prompt led to an approximate 10% accuracy drop for Gemini 1.5 Flash over nine turns.
• Score: 5.136381688235197
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are adopted in an increasingly wide range of applications, user-model interactions have grown in both frequency and scale. Consequently, research has focused on evaluating the robustness of LLMs, an essential quality for real-world tasks. In this paper, we employ simple multi-turn follow-up prompts to evaluate models' answer changes, model accuracy dynamics across turns with Markov chains, and examine whether linear probes can predict these changes. Our results show significant vulnerabilities in LLM robustness: a simple "Think again" prompt led to an approximate 10% accuracy drop for Gemini 1.5 Flash over nine turns, while combining this prompt with a semantically equivalent reworded question caused a 7.5% drop for Claude 3.5 Haiku. Additionally, we find that model accuracy across turns can be effectively modeled using Markov chains, enabling the prediction of accuracy probabilities over time. This allows for estimation of the model's stationary (long-run) accuracy, which we find to be on average approximately 8% lower than its first-turn accuracy for Gemini 1.5 Flash. Our results from a model's hidden states also reveal evidence that linear probes can help predict future answer changes. Together, these results establish stationary accuracy as a principled robustness metric for interactive settings and expose the fragility of models under repeated questioning. Addressing this instability will be essential for deploying LLMs in high-stakes and interactive settings where consistent reasoning is as important as initial accuracy.

Related papers

• On Calibration of Large Language Models: From Response To Capability [66.59139960234326]
  Large language models (LLMs) are widely deployed as general-purpose problem solvers.<n>We introduce capability calibration, which targets the model's expected accuracy on a query.<n>Our results demonstrate that capability-calibrated confidence improves pass@$k$ prediction and inference budget allocation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T01:07:45Z)
• Mitigating LLM Hallucination via Behaviorally Calibrated Reinforcement Learning [32.32593439144886]
  Behavior-calibrated reinforcement learning allows smaller models to surpass frontier models in uncertainty quantification.<n>Our model's log-scale Accuracy-to-Hallucination Ratio gain (0.806) exceeds GPT-5's (0.207) in a challenging in-domain evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T22:51:48Z)
• MaP: A Unified Framework for Reliable Evaluation of Pre-training Dynamics [72.00014675808228]
  Instability in Large Language Models evaluation process obscures true learning dynamics.<n>We introduce textbfMaP, a framework that integrates underlineMerging underlineand the underlinePass@k metric.<n>Experiments show that MaP yields significantly smoother performance curves, reduces inter-run variance, and ensures more consistent rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T11:40:27Z)
• DUAL: Dynamic Uncertainty-Aware Learning [19.100858792977807]
  We propose DynamicUncertainty-Aware Learning (DUAL), a unified framework that effectively handles feature uncertainty in both single-modal and multi-modal scenarios.<n>DUAL introduces three key innovations: Dynamic Feature Uncertainty Modeling, Adaptive Distribution-Aware Modulation, and Uncertainty-aware Cross-Modal Relationship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T18:50:15Z)
• RECSIP: REpeated Clustering of Scores Improving the Precision [0.0]
  We introduce the framework REpeated Clustering of Scores Improving the Precision (RECSIP)<n>RECSIP focuses on improving the precision of Large Language Models (LLMs) by asking multiple models in parallel, scoring and clustering their responses to ensure a higher reliability on the response.<n>The evaluation of our reference implementation recsip on the benchmark MMLU-Pro using the models GPT-4o, Claude and Gemini shows an overall increase of 5.8 per cent points compared to the best used model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-15T12:36:32Z)
• UncertaintyRAG: Span-Level Uncertainty Enhanced Long-Context Modeling for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [93.38604803625294]
  We present UncertaintyRAG, a novel approach for long-context Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) We use Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)-based span uncertainty to estimate similarity between text chunks. UncertaintyRAG outperforms baselines by 2.03% on LLaMA-2-7B, achieving state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T17:39:38Z)
• Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency [76.23956851098598]
  We explore the potential of deriving confidence from the distribution of multiple randomly sampled model generations, via three measures of consistency. Results show that consistency-based calibration methods outperform existing post-hoc approaches. We offer practical guidance on choosing suitable consistency metrics for calibration, tailored to the characteristics of various LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:15:20Z)
• How Easy is It to Fool Your Multimodal LLMs? An Empirical Analysis on Deceptive Prompts [54.07541591018305]
  We present MAD-Bench, a benchmark that contains 1000 test samples divided into 5 categories, such as non-existent objects, count of objects, and spatial relationship. We provide a comprehensive analysis of popular MLLMs, ranging from GPT-4v, Reka, Gemini-Pro, to open-sourced models, such as LLaVA-NeXT and MiniCPM-Llama3. While GPT-4o achieves 82.82% accuracy on MAD-Bench, the accuracy of any other model in our experiments ranges from 9% to 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:31:27Z)
• Selective Learning: Towards Robust Calibration with Dynamic Regularization [79.92633587914659]
  Miscalibration in deep learning refers to there is a discrepancy between the predicted confidence and performance. We introduce Dynamic Regularization (DReg) which aims to learn what should be learned during training thereby circumventing the confidence adjusting trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T11:25:20Z)
• Pruning Large Language Models via Accuracy Predictor [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) containing tens of billions of parameters (or even more) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in various NLP tasks. We propose a novel pruning approach: firstly, a training set of a certain number of architecture-accuracy pairs is established, and then a non-neural model is trained as an accuracy predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:38:24Z)
• Towards a robust and reliable deep learning approach for detection of compact binary mergers in gravitational wave data [0.0]
  We develop a deep learning model stage-wise and work towards improving its robustness and reliability. We retrain the model in a novel framework involving a generative adversarial network (GAN) Although absolute robustness is practically impossible to achieve, we demonstrate some fundamental improvements earned through such training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T18:00:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.