Armadillo: Robust Single-Server Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning with Input Validation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10863v1
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:16:53 GMT
- Title: Armadillo: Robust Single-Server Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning with Input Validation
- Abstract summary: Armadillo is designed for federated learning setting, where a single powerful server interacts with many weak clients iteratively to train models on client's private data.<n>This paper presents a secure aggregation system that has disruptive resistance against adversarial clients, such that any coalition of malicious clients can affect the aggregation result only by misreporting their private inputs in a pre-defined legitimate range.
- Score: 12.332129175789072
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a secure aggregation system Armadillo that has disruptive resistance against adversarial clients, such that any coalition of malicious clients (within the tolerated threshold) can affect the aggregation result only by misreporting their private inputs in a pre-defined legitimate range. Armadillo is designed for federated learning setting, where a single powerful server interacts with many weak clients iteratively to train models on client's private data. While a few prior works consider disruption resistance under such setting, they either incur high per-client cost (Chowdhury et al. CCS '22) or require many rounds (Bell et al. USENIX Security '23). Although disruption resistance can be achieved generically with zero-knowledge proof techniques (which we also use in this paper), we realize an efficient system with two new designs: 1) a simple two-layer secure aggregation protocol that requires only simple arithmetic computation; 2) an agreement protocol that removes the effect of malicious clients from the aggregation with low round complexity. With these techniques, Armadillo completes each secure aggregation in 3 rounds while keeping the server and clients computationally lightweight.
Related papers
- DisAgg: Distributed Aggregators for Efficient Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning [23.144047085164825]
Federated learning enables collaborative model training across distributed clients, yet vanilla FL exposes client updates to the central server.<n>We propose a new protocol called DisAgg that leverages a small committee of clients called Aggregators to perform the aggregation itself.<n>DisAgg processes 100k-dimensional update vectors from 100k 5G clients with a 4.6x speedup compared to OPA, the previous best protocol.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T15:56:12Z) - Repurposing Backdoors for Good: Ephemeral Intrinsic Proofs for Verifiable Aggregation in Cross-silo Federated Learning [30.440611659881494]
We propose a lightweight architecture that shifts from cryptographic proofs to textitIntrinsic Proofs<n>We harness Catastrophic Forgetting to embed verification signals directly into model parameters.<n>Our approach achieves over $1000times$ speedup on ResNet-18 compared to cryptographic baselines, effectively scaling to large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T12:04:18Z) - ZORRO: Zero-Knowledge Robustness and Privacy for Split Learning (Full Version) [58.595691399741646]
Split Learning (SL) is a distributed learning approach that enables resource-constrained clients to collaboratively train deep neural networks (DNNs)<n>This setup enables SL to leverage server capacities without sharing data, making it highly effective in resource-constrained environments dealing with sensitive data.<n>We present ZORRO, a private, verifiable, and robust SL defense scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-11T18:44:09Z) - Pigeon-SL: Robust Split Learning Framework for Edge Intelligence under Malicious Clients [53.496957000114875]
We introduce Pigeon-SL, a novel scheme that guarantees at least one entirely honest cluster among M clients, even when up to N of them are adversarial.<n>In each global round, the access point partitions the clients into N+1 clusters, trains each cluster independently via vanilla SL, and evaluates their validation losses on a shared dataset.<n>Only the cluster with the lowest loss advances, thereby isolating and discarding malicious updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-04T09:34:50Z) - $\mathsf{OPA}$: One-shot Private Aggregation with Single Client Interaction and its Applications to Federated Learning [7.713377215066152]
We introduce One-shot Private Aggregation ($mathsfOPA$) where clients speak only once (or even choose not to speak) per aggregation evaluation.<n>Since each client communicates only once per aggregation, this simplifies managing dropouts and dynamic participation.<n>$mathsfOPA$ is practical, outperforming state-of-the-art solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-29T17:50:11Z) - Boosting Communication Efficiency of Federated Learning's Secure Aggregation [22.943966056320424]
Federated Learning (FL) is a decentralized machine learning approach where client devices train models locally and send them to a server.
FL is vulnerable to model inversion attacks, where the server can infer sensitive client data from trained models.
Google's Secure Aggregation (SecAgg) protocol addresses this data privacy issue by masking each client's trained model.
This poster introduces a Communication-Efficient Secure Aggregation (CESA) protocol that substantially reduces this overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T10:00:16Z) - Robust and Actively Secure Serverless Collaborative Learning [48.01929996757643]
Collaborative machine learning (ML) is widely used to enable institutions to learn better models from distributed data.
While collaborative approaches to learning intuitively protect user data, they remain vulnerable to either the server, the clients, or both.
We propose a peer-to-peer (P2P) learning scheme that is secure against malicious servers and robust to malicious clients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T14:43:03Z) - Client-specific Property Inference against Secure Aggregation in
Federated Learning [52.8564467292226]
Federated learning has become a widely used paradigm for collaboratively training a common model among different participants.
Many attacks have shown that it is still possible to infer sensitive information such as membership, property, or outright reconstruction of participant data.
We show that simple linear models can effectively capture client-specific properties only from the aggregated model updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T14:11:01Z) - ScionFL: Efficient and Robust Secure Quantized Aggregation [36.668162197302365]
We introduce ScionFL, the first secure aggregation framework for federated learning.
It operates efficiently on quantized inputs and simultaneously provides robustness against malicious clients.
We show that with no overhead for clients and moderate overhead for the server, we obtain comparable accuracy for standard FL benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-13T21:46:55Z) - FLCert: Provably Secure Federated Learning against Poisoning Attacks [67.8846134295194]
We propose FLCert, an ensemble federated learning framework that is provably secure against poisoning attacks.
Our experiments show that the label predicted by our FLCert for a test input is provably unaffected by a bounded number of malicious clients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-02T17:50:04Z) - Towards Bidirectional Protection in Federated Learning [70.36925233356335]
F2ED-LEARNING offers bidirectional defense against malicious centralized server and Byzantine malicious clients.
F2ED-LEARNING securely aggregates each shard's update and launches FilterL2 on updates from different shards.
evaluation shows that F2ED-LEARNING consistently achieves optimal or close-to-optimal performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-02T19:37:02Z) - FastSecAgg: Scalable Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated
Learning [18.237186837994585]
A'secure aggregation' protocol enables the server to aggregate clients' models in a privacy-preserving manner.
FastSecAgg is efficient in terms of computation and communication, and robust to client dropouts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-23T16:49:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.