Decision-Making Amid Information-Based Threats in Sociotechnical Systems: A Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11595v1
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 13:26:41 GMT
- Title: Decision-Making Amid Information-Based Threats in Sociotechnical Systems: A Review
- Authors: Aaron R. Allred, Erin E. Richardson, Sarah R. Bostrom, James Crum, Cara Spencer, Chad Tossell, Richard E. Niemeyer, Leanne Hirshfield, Allison P. A. Hayman,
- Abstract summary: Technological systems increasingly mediate human information exchange, spanning interactions among humans as well as between humans and artificial agents.<n>This review synthesizes insights from both domains to identify shared cognitive mechanisms that mediate vulnerability to information-based threats and shape behavioral outcomes.<n>We outline directions for future research aimed at integrating these perspectives, emphasizing the importance of such integration for mitigating human vulnerabilities and aligning human-machine representations.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Technological systems increasingly mediate human information exchange, spanning interactions among humans as well as between humans and artificial agents. The unprecedented scale and reliance on information disseminated through these systems substantially expand the scope of information-based influence that can both enable and undermine sound decision-making. Consequently, understanding and protecting decision-making today faces growing challenges, as individuals and organizations must navigate evolving opportunities and information-based threats across varied domains and information environments. While these risks are widely recognized, research remains fragmented: work evaluating information-based threat phenomena has progressed largely in isolation from foundational studies of human information processing. In this review, we synthesize insights from both domains to identify shared cognitive mechanisms that mediate vulnerability to information-based threats and shape behavioral outcomes. Finally, we outline directions for future research aimed at integrating these perspectives, emphasizing the importance of such integration for mitigating human vulnerabilities and aligning human-machine representations.
Related papers
- Behavioral Outcomes of Human Cognitive Security within an Integrative Modeling Framework [0.0]
Information-based threats pose challenges to human cognitive processes and behavior.<n>There is no well-defined construct for characterizing the degree to which information-based threats influence changes in human judgments and decision-making.<n>Here, we introduce a human cognitive security construct focused on linking information-based threats to observable outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T01:26:12Z) - AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z) - Responsible Diffusion: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety, Ethics, and Trust in Diffusion Models [69.22690439422531]
Diffusion models (DMs) have been investigated in various domains due to their ability to generate high-quality data.<n>Similar to traditional deep learning systems, there also exist potential threats to DMs.<n>This survey comprehensively elucidates its framework, threats, and countermeasures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T02:51:43Z) - Information Retrieval in the Age of Generative AI: The RGB Model [77.96475639967431]
This paper presents a novel quantitative approach to shed light on the complex information dynamics arising from the growing use of generative AI tools.<n>We propose a model to characterize the generation, indexing, and dissemination of information in response to new topics.<n>Our findings suggest that the rapid pace of generative AI adoption, combined with increasing user reliance, can outpace human verification, escalating the risk of inaccurate information proliferation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-29T10:21:40Z) - Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.<n>In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z) - A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives [50.27382951812502]
stance detection has emerged as a crucial subfield within affective computing.
Recent years have seen a surge of research interest in developing effective stance detection methods.
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of stance detection techniques on social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T03:06:25Z) - Detecting and Mitigating Bias in Algorithms Used to Disseminate Information in Social Networks [0.03883607294385062]
Influence algorithms are used to identify sets of influencers.
We show that seeding information using these methods creates information gaps.
We devise a multi-objective algorithm which maximizes influence and information equity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T13:17:57Z) - Sociotechnical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Access [4.3867169221012645]
Generative AI technologies may enable new ways to access information and improve effectiveness of existing information retrieval systems.
We present an overview of some of the systemic consequences and risks of employing generative AI in the context of information access.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-19T17:04:39Z) - Information That Matters: Exploring Information Needs of People Affected by Algorithmic Decisions [11.421963387588864]
"XAI Novice Question Bank" is an extension of the XAI Question Bank containing a catalog of information needs from AI novices.
"XAI Novice Question Bank" contains a catalog of information needs from AI novices in two use cases: employment prediction and health monitoring.
Our work aims to support the inclusion of AI novices in explainability efforts by highlighting their information needs, aims, and challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T09:39:39Z) - Adaptive cognitive fit: Artificial intelligence augmented management of
information facets and representations [62.997667081978825]
Explosive growth in big data technologies and artificial intelligence [AI] applications have led to increasing pervasiveness of information facets.
Information facets, such as equivocality and veracity, can dominate and significantly influence human perceptions of information.
We suggest that artificially intelligent technologies that can adapt information representations to overcome cognitive limitations are necessary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-25T02:47:25Z) - Survey of Network Intrusion Detection Methods from the Perspective of
the Knowledge Discovery in Databases Process [63.75363908696257]
We review the methods that have been applied to network data with the purpose of developing an intrusion detector.
We discuss the techniques used for the capture, preparation and transformation of the data, as well as, the data mining and evaluation methods.
As a result of this literature review, we investigate some open issues which will need to be considered for further research in the area of network security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-27T11:21:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.