Improving LLM's Attachment to External Knowledge In Dialogue Generation Tasks Through Entity Anonymization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11946v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 23:37:35 GMT
• Title: Improving LLM's Attachment to External Knowledge In Dialogue Generation Tasks Through Entity Anonymization
• Authors: Hadi Sheikhi, Chenyang Huang, Osmar R. Zaïane,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results across various NLP tasks, but their ability to utilize external knowledge remains under-explored.<n>We observe that LLMs often rely on internal knowledge, leading to detachment from provided knowledge graphs.<n>First, we introduce LLM-KAT, an evaluation procedure for measuring knowledge attachment in generated responses.<n>Second, we propose a simple yet effective entity anonymization technique to encourage LLMs to better leverage external knowledge.
• Score: 7.386591427697652
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Knowledge graph-based dialogue generation (KG-DG) is a challenging task requiring models to effectively incorporate external knowledge into conversational responses. While large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results across various NLP tasks, their ability to utilize external knowledge in KG-DG remains under-explored. We observe that LLMs often rely on internal knowledge, leading to detachment from provided knowledge graphs, even when they are given a flawlessly retrieved knowledge graph. First, we introduce LLM-KAT, an evaluation procedure for measuring knowledge attachment in generated responses. Second, we propose a simple yet effective entity anonymization technique to encourage LLMs to better leverage external knowledge. Experiments on the OpenDialKG dataset demonstrate that our approach improves LLMs' attachment on external knowledge.

Related papers

• LLM Inference Enhanced by External Knowledge: A Survey [16.319049759753106]
  This study explores strategies for using external knowledge to enhance large language models (LLMs)<n>Our comparative analysis highlights the trade-offs among interpretability, scalability, and performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T09:08:51Z)
• Unveiling Knowledge Utilization Mechanisms in LLM-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation [77.10390725623125]
  retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely employed to expand their knowledge scope.<n>Since RAG has shown promise in knowledge-intensive tasks like open-domain question answering, its broader application to complex tasks and intelligent assistants has further advanced its utility.<n>We present a systematic investigation of the intrinsic mechanisms by which RAGs integrate internal (parametric) and external (retrieved) knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T13:13:13Z)
• KnowPath: Knowledge-enhanced Reasoning via LLM-generated Inference Paths over Knowledge Graphs [35.63483147113076]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various complex tasks, yet they still suffer from hallucinations.<n>We propose KnowPath, a knowledge-enhanced large model framework driven by the collaboration of internal and external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T17:02:01Z)
• KaLM: Knowledge-aligned Autoregressive Language Modeling via Dual-view Knowledge Graph Contrastive Learning [74.21524111840652]
  This paper proposes textbfKaLM, a textitKnowledge-aligned Language Modeling approach.<n>It fine-tunes autoregressive large language models to align with KG knowledge via the joint objective of explicit knowledge alignment and implicit knowledge alignment.<n> Notably, our method achieves a significant performance boost in evaluations of knowledge-driven tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T11:08:24Z)
• Internal and External Knowledge Interactive Refinement Framework for Knowledge-Intensive Question Answering [33.89176174108559]
  We propose a new internal and external knowledge interactive refinement paradigm dubbed IEKR. By simply adding a prompt like 'Tell me something about' to the LLMs, we try to review related explicit knowledge and insert them with the query into the retriever for external retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T10:52:57Z)
• InfuserKI: Enhancing Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs via Infuser-Guided Knowledge Integration [58.61492157691623]
  Methods for integrating knowledge have been developed, which augment LLMs with domain-specific knowledge graphs through external modules.<n>Our research focuses on a novel problem: efficiently integrating unknown knowledge into LLMs without unnecessary overlap of known knowledge.<n>A risk of introducing new knowledge is the potential forgetting of existing knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T03:36:26Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z)
• KnowledgeNavigator: Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhanced Reasoning over Knowledge Graph [11.808990571175269]
  Large language model (LLM) has achieved outstanding performance on various downstream tasks with its powerful natural language understanding and zero-shot capability, but LLM still suffers from knowledge limitation. We propose a novel framework KnowledgeNavigator to address these challenges by efficiently and accurately retrieving external knowledge from knowledge graph. We evaluate KnowledgeNavigator on multiple public KGQA benchmarks, the experiments show the framework has great effectiveness and generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T04:22:56Z)
• RECALL: A Benchmark for LLMs Robustness against External Counterfactual Knowledge [69.79676144482792]
  This study aims to evaluate the ability of LLMs to distinguish reliable information from external knowledge. Our benchmark consists of two tasks, Question Answering and Text Generation, and for each task, we provide models with a context containing counterfactual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T13:24:19Z)
• "Merge Conflicts!" Exploring the Impacts of External Distractors to Parametric Knowledge Graphs [15.660128743249611]
  Large language models (LLMs) acquire extensive knowledge during pre-training, known as their parametric knowledge. LLMs inevitably require external knowledge during their interactions with users. This raises a crucial question: How will LLMs respond when external knowledge interferes with their parametric knowledge?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T17:47:59Z)
• Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentation [109.8527403904657]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) possess unwavering confidence in their knowledge and cannot handle the conflict between internal and external knowledge well. Retrieval augmentation proves to be an effective approach in enhancing LLMs' awareness of knowledge boundaries. We propose a simple method to dynamically utilize supporting documents with our judgement strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T16:46:10Z)
• Knowledge Rumination for Pre-trained Language Models [77.55888291165462]
  We propose a new paradigm dubbed Knowledge Rumination to help the pre-trained language model utilize related latent knowledge without retrieving it from the external corpus. We apply the proposed knowledge rumination to various language models, including RoBERTa, DeBERTa, and GPT-3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T15:47:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.