How Good is BLI as an Alignment Measure: A Study in Word Embedding Paradigm

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13040v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 06:41:41 GMT
• Title: How Good is BLI as an Alignment Measure: A Study in Word Embedding Paradigm
• Authors: Kasun Wickramasinghe, Nisansa de Silva,
• Abstract summary: We explore the strengths and limitations of BLI as a measure to evaluate the degree of alignment of two embedding spaces.<n>We evaluate how well traditional embedding alignment techniques, novel multilingual models, and combined alignment techniques perform BLI tasks.<n>We propose a novel stem-based BLI approach to evaluate two aligned embedding spaces that take into account the inflected nature of languages.
• Score: 1.4712349476860904
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Sans a dwindling number of monolingual embedding studies originating predominantly from the low-resource domains, it is evident that multilingual embedding has become the de facto choice due to its adaptability to the usage of code-mixed languages, granting the ability to process multilingual documents in a language-agnostic manner, as well as removing the difficult task of aligning monolingual embeddings. But is this victory complete? Are the multilingual models better than aligned monolingual models in every aspect? Can the higher computational cost of multilingual models always be justified? Or is there a compromise between the two extremes? Bilingual Lexicon Induction is one of the most widely used metrics in terms of evaluating the degree of alignment between two embedding spaces. In this study, we explore the strengths and limitations of BLI as a measure to evaluate the degree of alignment of two embedding spaces. Further, we evaluate how well traditional embedding alignment techniques, novel multilingual models, and combined alignment techniques perform BLI tasks in the contexts of both high-resource and low-resource languages. In addition to that, we investigate the impact of the language families to which the pairs of languages belong. We identify that BLI does not measure the true degree of alignment in some cases and we propose solutions for them. We propose a novel stem-based BLI approach to evaluate two aligned embedding spaces that take into account the inflected nature of languages as opposed to the prevalent word-based BLI techniques. Further, we introduce a vocabulary pruning technique that is more informative in showing the degree of the alignment, especially performing BLI on multilingual embedding models. Often, combined embedding alignment techniques perform better while in certain cases multilingual embeddings perform better (mainly low-resource language cases).

Related papers

• Cross-Domain Bilingual Lexicon Induction via Pretrained Language Models [22.297388572921477]
  We propose a new task of BLI, which is to use the monolingual corpus of the general domain and target domain to extract domain-specific bilingual dictionaries.<n>Motivated by the ability of Pre-trained models, we propose a method to get better word embeddings that build on the recent work on BLI.<n> Experimental results show that our method can improve performances over robust BLI baselines on three specific domains by averagely improving 0.78 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T06:37:02Z)
• Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models [62.91524967852552]
  Large language models (LLMs) are typically multilingual due to pretraining on diverse multilingual corpora.<n>But can these models relate corresponding concepts across languages, i.e., be crosslingual?<n>This study evaluates state-of-the-art LLMs on inherently crosslingual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T15:15:17Z)
• On Bilingual Lexicon Induction with Large Language Models [81.6546357879259]
  We examine the potential of the latest generation of Large Language Models for the development of bilingual lexicons. We study 1) zero-shot prompting for unsupervised BLI and 2) few-shot in-context prompting with a set of seed translation pairs. Our work is the first to demonstrate strong BLI capabilities of text-to-text mLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-21T12:43:27Z)
• When your Cousin has the Right Connections: Unsupervised Bilingual Lexicon Induction for Related Data-Imbalanced Languages [29.346191691508125]
  Unsupervised bilingual lexicon induction is most likely to be useful for low-resource languages, where large datasets are not available. We show that state-of-the-art BLI methods in the literature exhibit near-zero performance for severely data-imbalanced language pairs. We present a new method for unsupervised BLI between a related LRL and HRL that only requires inference on a masked language model of the HRL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T12:49:21Z)
• Enhancing Cross-lingual Natural Language Inference by Soft Prompting with Multilingual Verbalizer [52.46740830977898]
  Cross-lingual natural language inference is a fundamental problem in cross-lingual language understanding. We propose a novel Soft prompt learning framework with the Multilingual Verbalizer (SoftMV) for XNLI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T06:31:29Z)
• Multilingual Sentence Transformer as A Multilingual Word Aligner [15.689680887384847]
  We investigate whether multilingual sentence Transformer LaBSE is a strong multilingual word aligner. Experiment results on seven language pairs show that our best aligner outperforms previous state-of-the-art models of all varieties. Our aligner supports different language pairs in a single model, and even achieves new state-of-the-art on zero-shot language pairs that does not appear in the finetuning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T09:28:55Z)
• Improving Bilingual Lexicon Induction with Cross-Encoder Reranking [31.142790337451366]
  We propose a novel semi-supervised post-hoc reranking method termed BLICEr (BLI with Cross-Encoder Reranking) The key idea is to 'extract' cross-lingual lexical knowledge from mPLMs, and then combine it with the original CLWEs. BLICEr establishes new results on two standard BLI benchmarks spanning a wide spectrum of diverse languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-30T21:26:07Z)
• Exposing Cross-Lingual Lexical Knowledge from Multilingual Sentence Encoders [85.80950708769923]
  We probe multilingual language models for the amount of cross-lingual lexical knowledge stored in their parameters, and compare them against the original multilingual LMs. We also devise a novel method to expose this knowledge by additionally fine-tuning multilingual models. We report substantial gains on standard benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T13:23:16Z)
• AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
  We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context. It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts. Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z)
• On the Language Neutrality of Pre-trained Multilingual Representations [70.93503607755055]
  We investigate the language-neutrality of multilingual contextual embeddings directly and with respect to lexical semantics. Our results show that contextual embeddings are more language-neutral and, in general, more informative than aligned static word-type embeddings. We show how to reach state-of-the-art accuracy on language identification and match the performance of statistical methods for word alignment of parallel sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-09T19:50:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.