Applying Large Language Models to Characterize Public Narratives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13505v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 15:41:55 GMT
• Title: Applying Large Language Models to Characterize Public Narratives
• Authors: Elinor Poole-Dayan, Daniel T Kessler, Hannah Chiou, Margaret Hughes, Emily S Lin, Marshall Ganz, Deb Roy,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel computational framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to automate the qualitative annotation of public narratives.<n>Our work reveals that LLMs can achieve near-human-expert performance, achieving an average F1 score of 0.80 across 8 narratives and 14 codes.
• Score: 10.803799931002061
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Public Narratives (PNs) are key tools for leadership development and civic mobilization, yet their systematic analysis remains challenging due to their subjective interpretation and the high cost of expert annotation. In this work, we propose a novel computational framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to automate the qualitative annotation of public narratives. Using a codebook we co-developed with subject-matter experts, we evaluate LLM performance against that of expert annotators. Our work reveals that LLMs can achieve near-human-expert performance, achieving an average F1 score of 0.80 across 8 narratives and 14 codes. We then extend our analysis to empirically explore how PN framework elements manifest across a larger dataset of 22 stories. Lastly, we extrapolate our analysis to a set of political speeches, establishing a novel lens in which to analyze political rhetoric in civic spaces. This study demonstrates the potential of LLM-assisted annotation for scalable narrative analysis and highlights key limitations and directions for future research in computational civic storytelling.

Related papers

• Structuralist Approach to AI Literary Criticism: Leveraging Greimas Semiotic Square for Large Language Models [2.7323591332394166]
  GLASS (Greimas Literary Analysis via Semiotic Square) is a structured analytical framework based on Greimas Semiotic Square (GSS)<n> GLASS facilitates the rapid dissection of narrative structures and deep meanings in narrative works.<n>This research provides an AI-based tool for literary research and education, offering insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying literary engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T15:10:24Z)
• Potential and Perils of Large Language Models as Judges of Unstructured Textual Data [0.631976908971572]
  This research investigates the effectiveness of LLM-as-judge models to evaluate the thematic alignment of summaries generated by other LLMs.<n>Our findings reveal that while LLM-as-judge offer a scalable solution comparable to human raters, humans may still excel at detecting subtle, context-specific nuances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T14:49:14Z)
• Narrative Analysis of True Crime Podcasts With Knowledge Graph-Augmented Large Language Models [8.78598447041169]
  Large language models (LLMs) still struggle with complex narrative arcs as well as narratives containing conflicting information. Recent work indicates LLMs augmented with external knowledge bases can improve the accuracy and interpretability of the resulting models. In this work, we analyze the effectiveness of applying knowledge graphs (KGs) in understanding true-crime podcast data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T21:49:00Z)
• A Bayesian Approach to Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Authorship Attribution [57.309390098903]
  Authorship attribution aims to identify the origin or author of a document. Large Language Models (LLMs) with their deep reasoning capabilities and ability to maintain long-range textual associations offer a promising alternative. Our results on the IMDb and blog datasets show an impressive 85% accuracy in one-shot authorship classification across ten authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T04:14:23Z)
• Advancing Annotation of Stance in Social Media Posts: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models and Crowd Sourcing [2.936331223824117]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated text annotation in social media posts has garnered significant interest. We analyze the performance of eight open-source and proprietary LLMs for annotating the stance expressed in social media posts. A significant finding of our study is that the explicitness of text expressing a stance plays a critical role in how faithfully LLMs' stance judgments match humans'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T17:26:07Z)
• LFED: A Literary Fiction Evaluation Dataset for Large Language Models [58.85989777743013]
  We collect 95 literary fictions that are either originally written in Chinese or translated into Chinese, covering a wide range of topics across several centuries. We define a question taxonomy with 8 question categories to guide the creation of 1,304 questions. We conduct an in-depth analysis to ascertain how specific attributes of literary fictions (e.g., novel types, character numbers, the year of publication) impact LLM performance in evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T15:02:24Z)
• NovelQA: Benchmarking Question Answering on Documents Exceeding 200K Tokens [63.7488938083696]
  We introduce NovelQA, a benchmark tailored for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) with complex, extended narratives.<n>NovelQA offers a unique blend of complexity, length, and narrative coherence, making it an ideal tool for assessing deep textual understanding.<n>Our evaluation of long-context LLMs on NovelQA reveals significant insights into their strengths and weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:32:32Z)
• CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotation [94.59630161324013]
  We propose CoAnnotating, a novel paradigm for Human-LLM co-annotation of unstructured texts at scale. Our empirical study shows CoAnnotating to be an effective means to allocate work from results on different datasets, with up to 21% performance improvement over random baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:56:49Z)
• L-Eval: Instituting Standardized Evaluation for Long Context Language Models [91.05820785008527]
  We propose L-Eval to institute a more standardized evaluation for long context language models (LCLMs) We build a new evaluation suite containing 20 sub-tasks, 508 long documents, and over 2,000 human-labeled query-response pairs. Results show that popular n-gram matching metrics generally can not correlate well with human judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T17:59:41Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.