Review of Passenger Flow Modelling Approaches Based on a Bibliometric Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13742v1
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 07:13:18 GMT
- Title: Review of Passenger Flow Modelling Approaches Based on a Bibliometric Analysis
- Authors: Jonathan Hecht, Weilian Li, Ziyue Li, Youness Dehbi,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the field of short-term passenger flow forecasting within local public transit.<n>It covers 814 publications that span from 1984 to 2024.
- Score: 6.753820018099341
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the field of short-term passenger flow forecasting within local public transit, covering 814 publications that span from 1984 to 2024. In addition to common bibliometric analysis tools, a variant of a citation network was developed, and topic modelling was conducted. The analysis reveals that research activity exhibited sporadic patterns prior to 2008, followed by a marked acceleration, characterised by a shift from conventional statistical and machine learning methodologies (e.g., ARIMA, SVM, and basic neural networks) to specialised deep learning architectures. Based on this insight, a connection to more general fields such as machine learning and time series modelling was established. In addition to modelling, spatial, linguistic, and modal biases were identified and findings from existing secondary literature were validated and quantified. This revealed existing gaps, such as constrained data fusion, open (multivariate) data, and underappreciated challenges related to model interpretability, cost-efficiency, and a balance between algorithmic performance and practical deployment considerations. In connection with the superordinate fields, the growth in relevance of foundation models is also noteworthy.
Related papers
- A Large-scale Benchmark on Geological Fault Delineation Models: Domain Shift, Training Dynamics, Generalizability, Evaluation and Inferential Behavior [11.859145373647474]
We present the first large-scale benchmarking study designed to provide guidelines for domain shift strategies in seismic interpretation.<n>Our benchmark spans over 200 combinations of model architectures, datasets and training strategies, across three datasets.<n>Our analysis shows that common fine-tuning practices can lead to catastrophic forgetting when source and target datasets are disjoint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T13:56:43Z) - Foundation Models for Time Series: A Survey [0.27835153780240135]
Transformer-based foundation models have emerged as a dominant paradigm in time series analysis.<n>This survey introduces a novel taxonomy to categorize them across several dimensions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-05T01:27:55Z) - A Survey of Model Architectures in Information Retrieval [59.61734783818073]
The period from 2019 to the present has represented one of the biggest paradigm shifts in information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP)<n>We trace the development from traditional term-based methods to modern neural approaches, particularly highlighting the impact of transformer-based models and subsequent large language models (LLMs)<n>We conclude with a forward-looking discussion of emerging challenges and future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T18:42:58Z) - A Survey on Diffusion Models for Time Series and Spatio-Temporal Data [92.1255811066468]
We review the use of diffusion models in time series and S-temporal data, categorizing them by model, task type, data modality, and practical application domain.
We categorize diffusion models into unconditioned and conditioned types discuss time series and S-temporal data separately.
Our survey covers their application extensively in various fields including healthcare, recommendation, climate, energy, audio, and transportation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T17:19:40Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on Generative Diffusion Models for Structured
Data [0.0]
generative diffusion models have achieved a rapid paradigm shift in deep generative models.
Structured data has been received comparatively limited attention from the deep learning research community.
This review serves as a catalyst for the research community, promoting developments in generative diffusion models for structured data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T04:26:41Z) - Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Predictors in the Presence of Missing and Heterogeneous Data [23.280400290071732]
Deep learning approaches achieve outstanding predictive performance in modeling modern data, despite increasing complexity and scale.<n> evaluating the quality of predictive models becomes more challenging as traditional statistical assumptions often no longer hold.<n>This paper introduces a residual analysis framework designed to assess the optimality of temporal-temporal predictive neural models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-03T12:55:08Z) - Generalization Properties of Retrieval-based Models [50.35325326050263]
Retrieval-based machine learning methods have enjoyed success on a wide range of problems.
Despite growing literature showcasing the promise of these models, the theoretical underpinning for such models remains underexplored.
We present a formal treatment of retrieval-based models to characterize their generalization ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-06T00:33:01Z) - Temporal Relevance Analysis for Video Action Models [70.39411261685963]
We first propose a new approach to quantify the temporal relationships between frames captured by CNN-based action models.
We then conduct comprehensive experiments and in-depth analysis to provide a better understanding of how temporal modeling is affected.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-25T19:06:48Z) - Spatial machine-learning model diagnostics: a model-agnostic
distance-based approach [91.62936410696409]
This contribution proposes spatial prediction error profiles (SPEPs) and spatial variable importance profiles (SVIPs) as novel model-agnostic assessment and interpretation tools.
The SPEPs and SVIPs of geostatistical methods, linear models, random forest, and hybrid algorithms show striking differences and also relevant similarities.
The novel diagnostic tools enrich the toolkit of spatial data science, and may improve ML model interpretation, selection, and design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-13T01:50:36Z) - A comprehensive comparative evaluation and analysis of Distributional
Semantic Models [61.41800660636555]
We perform a comprehensive evaluation of type distributional vectors, either produced by static DSMs or obtained by averaging the contextualized vectors generated by BERT.
The results show that the alleged superiority of predict based models is more apparent than real, and surely not ubiquitous.
We borrow from cognitive neuroscience the methodology of Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) to inspect the semantic spaces generated by distributional models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-20T15:18:06Z) - Predicting Multidimensional Data via Tensor Learning [0.0]
We develop a model that retains the intrinsic multidimensional structure of the dataset.
To estimate the model parameters, an Alternating Least Squares algorithm is developed.
The proposed model is able to outperform benchmark models present in the forecasting literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-11T11:57:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.