Sovereign AI: Rethinking Autonomy in the Age of Global Interdependence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15734v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:02:10 GMT
• Title: Sovereign AI: Rethinking Autonomy in the Age of Global Interdependence
• Abstract summary: Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a foundational general-purpose technology, raising new dilemmas of sovereignty in an interconnected world.<n>This paper develops a conceptual and formal framework for understanding sovereign AI as a continuum rather than a binary condition.<n>We present a planner's model that identifies two policy pillars: equalizing marginal returns across the four sovereignty pillars and setting openness where global benefits equal exposure risks.
• Score: 2.153445979060976
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a foundational general-purpose technology, raising new dilemmas of sovereignty in an interconnected world. While governments seek greater control over it, the very foundations of AI--global data pipelines, semiconductor supply chains, open-source ecosystems, and international standards--resist enclosure. This paper develops a conceptual and formal framework for understanding sovereign AI as a continuum rather than a binary condition, balancing autonomy with interdependence. Drawing on classical theories, historical analogies, and contemporary debates on networked autonomy, we present a planner's model that identifies two policy heuristics: equalizing marginal returns across the four sovereignty pillars and setting openness where global benefits equal exposure risks. We apply the model to India, highlighting sovereign footholds in data, compute, and norms but weaker model autonomy. The near-term challenge is integration via coupled Data x Compute investment, lifecycle governance (ModelOps), and safeguarded procurement. We then apply the model to the Middle East (Saudi Arabia and the UAE), where large public investment in Arabic-first models and sovereign cloud implies high sovereignty weights, lower effective fiscal constraints, and strong Data x Compute complementarities. An interior openness setting with guardrails emerges as optimal. Across contexts, the lesson is that sovereignty in AI needs managed interdependence, not isolation.

Related papers

• AI Sovereignty: A Qualitative Model of Strategic Competition as AI Becomes an Instrument of National Power [0.0]
  AI sovereignty is the extent to which a nation independently controls its artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.<n>The model identifies key leverage points that nations can use to enhance their own growth or degrade an adversary's.<n>If our assumptions and hypotheses are valid, this strategic competition may come to define how nations improve their economic situations, competitive advantage, and overall national power in the 21st Century.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T13:11:39Z)
• AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China [1.1675763847424785]
  This paper proposes a unified interpretation: France should be understood as a emphnational AI learning system.<n>It argues that the French AI debate should move beyond the binary opposition between techno-optimism and regulation-first caution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-30T13:49:42Z)
• Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution [80.98492754957466]
  Core trustworthy AI objectives, such as fairness, robustness, privacy, and explainability, are hard to achieve simultaneously.<n>This paper argues that causality is necessary to understand and balance trade-offs in performance and multiple objectives of trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T14:26:28Z)
• Should AI Become an Intergenerational Civil Right? [2.7937298764423573]
  We argue that access to AI should not be treated solely as a commercial service, but as a fundamental civil interest requiring explicit protection.<n>We propose recognizing access to AI as an emphIntergenerational Civil Right, establishing a legal and ethical framework that safeguards present-day inclusion and the rights of future generations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T20:22:16Z)
• Openness in AI and downstream governance: A global value chain approach [0.0]
  Openness in AI highlights an emerging ecosystem of open AI models, datasets and toolchains.<n>It poses questions as to whether open resources can support technological transfer and the ability for catch-up, even in the face of AI industry power.<n>This work extends previous mapping of AI value chains to build a framework which links foundational AI with downstream value chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T13:12:09Z)
• Generative AI as a Geopolitical Factor in Industry 5.0: Sovereignty, Access, and Control [0.4218593777811082]
  Industry 5.0 marks a new phase in industrial evolution, emphasizing human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience through the integration of advanced technologies.<n>Within this evolving landscape, Generative AI (GenAI) and autonomous systems are emerging as pivotal geopolitical instruments.<n>We argue that these technologies have become national assets central to sovereignty, access, and global influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T16:43:45Z)
• Rethinking Data Protection in the (Generative) Artificial Intelligence Era [138.07763415496288]
  We propose a four-level taxonomy that captures the diverse protection needs arising in modern (generative) AI models and systems.<n>Our framework offers a structured understanding of the trade-offs between data utility and control, spanning the entire AI pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T02:45:51Z)
• Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: Frontiers and Opportunities [145.6465312554513]
  This survey delivers a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging role of GenAI across the autonomous driving stack.<n>We begin by distilling the principles and trade-offs of modern generative modeling, encompassing VAEs, GANs, Diffusion Models, and Large Language Models.<n>We categorize practical applications, such as synthetic data generalization, end-to-end driving strategies, high-fidelity digital twin systems, smart transportation networks, and cross-domain transfer to embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T17:59:20Z)
• Alignment, Agency and Autonomy in Frontier AI: A Systems Engineering Perspective [0.0]
  Concepts of alignment, agency, and autonomy have become central to AI safety, governance, and control.<n>This paper traces the historical, philosophical, and technical evolution of these concepts, emphasizing how their definitions influence AI development, deployment, and oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T21:37:20Z)
• AI, Global Governance, and Digital Sovereignty [1.3976439685325095]
  We argue that AI systems will embed in global governance to create dueling dynamics of public/private cooperation and contestation. We conclude by sketching future directions for IR research on AI and global governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T00:05:33Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
  Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• The Role of Large Language Models in the Recognition of Territorial Sovereignty: An Analysis of the Construction of Legitimacy [67.44950222243865]
  We argue that technology tools like Google Maps and Large Language Models (LLM) are often perceived as impartial and objective. We highlight the case of three controversial territories: Crimea, West Bank and Transnitria, by comparing the responses of ChatGPT against Wikipedia information and United Nations resolutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T08:46:49Z)
• The Limits of Global Inclusion in AI Development [7.421135890148154]
  Extant global inequality has motivated Western institutions to involve more diverse groups in the development and application of AI systems. We argue that more focus should be placed on the redistribution of power, rather than just on including underrepresented groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-02T02:53:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.