AI Sovereignty: A Qualitative Model of Strategic Competition as AI Becomes an Instrument of National Power

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07245v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 13:11:39 GMT
• Title: AI Sovereignty: A Qualitative Model of Strategic Competition as AI Becomes an Instrument of National Power
• Abstract summary: AI sovereignty is the extent to which a nation independently controls its artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.<n>The model identifies key leverage points that nations can use to enhance their own growth or degrade an adversary's.<n>If our assumptions and hypotheses are valid, this strategic competition may come to define how nations improve their economic situations, competitive advantage, and overall national power in the 21st Century.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI sovereignty is the extent to which a nation independently controls its artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The race toward ever-more-sophisticated frontier AI models is of increasing strategic importance, with nations considering how AI might improve their economic situations, competitive advantage, and overall national power. However, the costs of AI sovereignty are enormous, and we lack definitions and conceptual models to navigate evolving AI sovereignty dynamics. We address this gap with definitions relevant to AI sovereignty, along with a first-of-its-kind qualitative model that incorporates micro, meso, and macro contributors. Model-based qualitative forecasts highlight competitive dynamics and evolving potential for AI-driven national power. The model identifies key leverage points that nations can use to enhance their own growth or degrade an adversary's, including consideration of accelerators, electricity, water, data sets and skilled workforce. These leverage points can be activated at strategic and operational levels through both direct kinetic actions, such as Iran's targeting of data centers with drones, and indirect non-kinetic effects including cyber, space, information, economic coercion and diplomacy. If our assumptions and hypotheses are valid, this strategic competition may come to define how nations improve their economic situations, competitive advantage, and overall national power in the 21st Century.

Related papers

• Sovereign by necessity? Frontier AI export controls, cyber security, and the limits of national AI capability [0.0]
  In June 2026 the United States required a leading developer to obtain licences before releasing its most advanced models to any foreign person.<n>This followed within months of the first documented case of a largely autonomous, AI-run cyber espionage campaign.<n>This article examines how these two developments interact, and situates them within the unusual market dynamics driving large-scale AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T14:09:45Z)
• AI+HW 2035: Shaping the Next Decade [135.53570243498987]
  Artificial intelligence (AI) and hardware (HW) are advancing at unprecedented rates, yet their trajectories have become inseparably intertwined.<n>This vision paper lays out a 10-year roadmap for AI+HW co-design and co-development, spanning algorithms, architectures, systems, and sustainability.<n>We identify key challenges and opportunities, candidly assess potential obstacles and pitfalls, and propose integrated solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T14:36:33Z)
• Sovereign AI: Rethinking Autonomy in the Age of Global Interdependence [2.153445979060976]
  Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a foundational general-purpose technology, raising new dilemmas of sovereignty in an interconnected world.<n>This paper develops a conceptual and formal framework for understanding sovereign AI as a continuum rather than a binary condition.<n>We present a planner's model that identifies two policy pillars: equalizing marginal returns across the four sovereignty pillars and setting openness where global benefits equal exposure risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T10:02:10Z)
• Governing Automated Strategic Intelligence [2.9522580051542593]
  Multimodal foundation models appear on track to automate strategic analysis previously done by humans.<n>They will be able to fuse today's abundant satellite imagery, phone-location traces, social media records, and written documents into a single queryable system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-21T14:04:25Z)
• Openness in AI and downstream governance: A global value chain approach [0.0]
  Openness in AI highlights an emerging ecosystem of open AI models, datasets and toolchains.<n>It poses questions as to whether open resources can support technological transfer and the ability for catch-up, even in the face of AI industry power.<n>This work extends previous mapping of AI value chains to build a framework which links foundational AI with downstream value chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T13:12:09Z)
• Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: Frontiers and Opportunities [145.6465312554513]
  This survey delivers a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging role of GenAI across the autonomous driving stack.<n>We begin by distilling the principles and trade-offs of modern generative modeling, encompassing VAEs, GANs, Diffusion Models, and Large Language Models.<n>We categorize practical applications, such as synthetic data generalization, end-to-end driving strategies, high-fidelity digital twin systems, smart transportation networks, and cross-domain transfer to embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T17:59:20Z)
• Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
  Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict.<n>Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers.<n>We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
  Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z)
• The Role of Large Language Models in the Recognition of Territorial Sovereignty: An Analysis of the Construction of Legitimacy [67.44950222243865]
  We argue that technology tools like Google Maps and Large Language Models (LLM) are often perceived as impartial and objective. We highlight the case of three controversial territories: Crimea, West Bank and Transnitria, by comparing the responses of ChatGPT against Wikipedia information and United Nations resolutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T08:46:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.