Artificial Intelligence and Accounting Research: A Framework and Agenda
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16055v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 05:18:39 GMT
- Title: Artificial Intelligence and Accounting Research: A Framework and Agenda
- Authors: Theophanis C. Stratopoulos, Victor Xiaoqi Wang,
- Abstract summary: generative AI (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs) are transforming accounting research.<n>This paper proposes a framework that classifies AI-accounting research along two dimensions: research focus and methodological approach.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly generative AI (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs), are fundamentally transforming accounting research, creating both opportunities and competitive threats for scholars. This paper proposes a framework that classifies AI-accounting research along two dimensions: research focus (accounting-centric versus AI-centric) and methodological approach (AI-based versus traditional methods). We apply this framework to papers from the IJAIS special issue and recent AI-accounting research published in leading accounting journals to map existing studies and identify research opportunities. Using this same framework, we analyze how accounting researchers can leverage their expertise through strategic positioning and collaboration, revealing where accounting scholars' strengths create the most value. We further examine how GenAI and LLMs transform the research process itself, comparing the capabilities of human researchers and AI agents across the entire research workflow. This analysis reveals that while GenAI democratizes certain research capabilities, it simultaneously intensifies competition by raising expectations for higher-order contributions where human judgment, creativity, and theoretical depth remain valuable. These shifts call for reforming doctoral education to cultivate comparative advantages while building AI fluency.
Related papers
- ResearcherBench: Evaluating Deep AI Research Systems on the Frontiers of Scientific Inquiry [22.615102398311432]
We introduce ResearcherBench, the first benchmark focused on evaluating the capabilities of deep AI research systems.<n>We compiled a dataset of 65 research questions expertly selected from real-world scientific scenarios.<n>OpenAI Deep Research and Gemini Deep Research significantly outperform other systems, with particular strength in open-ended consulting questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-22T06:51:26Z) - AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z) - The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z) - AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation [13.58669328864436]
We introduce AI-Researcher, a fully autonomous research system that transforms how AI-driven scientific discovery is conducted and evaluated.<n>Our framework seamlessly orchestrates the complete research pipeline--from literature review and hypothesis generation to algorithm implementation and publication-ready manuscript preparation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T13:54:38Z) - Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z) - The Design Space of Recent AI-assisted Research Tools for Ideation, Sensemaking, and Scientific Creativity [2.0558118968162673]
Generative AI (GenAI) tools are expanding the scope and capability of automation in knowledge work such as academic research.<n>While promising for augmenting cognition and streamlining processes, AI-assisted research tools may also increase automation bias and hinder critical thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-22T16:42:11Z) - Navigating Ethical Challenges in Generative AI-Enhanced Research: The ETHICAL Framework for Responsible Generative AI Use [0.0]
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in research presents both opportunities and ethical challenges.<n>This paper develops the ETHICAL framework, which is a practical guide for responsible GenAI use in research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-11T05:49:11Z) - Generative AI Tools in Academic Research: Applications and Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies [0.0]
This study examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic research, focusing on its application to qualitative and quantitative data analysis.
GenAI tools evolve rapidly, they offer new possibilities for enhancing research productivity and democratising complex analytical processes.
Their integration into academic practice raises significant questions regarding research integrity and security, authorship, and the changing nature of scholarly work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-13T13:10:03Z) - AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities.
The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z) - A Comprehensive Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Talent Analytics [46.025337523478825]
Talent analytics has emerged as a promising field in applied data science for human resource management.<n>Recent development of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence techniques have revolutionized human resource management.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-03T07:53:20Z) - Characterising Research Areas in the field of AI [68.8204255655161]
We identified the main conceptual themes by performing clustering analysis on the co-occurrence network of topics.
The results highlight the growing academic interest in research themes like deep learning, machine learning, and internet of things.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-26T16:30:30Z) - Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations.
Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z) - A narrowing of AI research? [0.0]
We study the evolution of the thematic diversity of AI research in academia and the private sector.
We measure the influence of private companies in AI research through the citations they receive and their collaborations with other institutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-22T08:23:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.