A Counterfactual LLM Framework for Detecting Human Biases: A Case Study of Sex/Gender in Emergency Triage

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17124v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 10:37:52 GMT
• Title: A Counterfactual LLM Framework for Detecting Human Biases: A Case Study of Sex/Gender in Emergency Triage
• Authors: Ariel Guerra-Adames, Marta Avalos-Fernandez, Océane Dorémus, Leo Anthony Celi, Cédric Gil-Jardiné, Emmanuel Lagarde,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel, domain-agnostic counterfactual approach that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to quantify gender disparities in human clinical decision-making.<n>We study emergency triage, validating the approach on more than 150,000 admissions to the Bordeaux University Hospital (France) and replicating results on a subset of MIMIC-IV across a different language, population, and healthcare system.<n>In the Bordeaux cohort, otherwise identical presentations were approximately 2.1% more likely to receive a lower-severity triage score when presented as female rather than male; scaled to national emergency volumes in France, this corresponds to more than 200,000 lower-
• Score: 1.9461694122897646
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a novel, domain-agnostic counterfactual approach that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to quantify gender disparities in human clinical decision-making. The method trains an LLM to emulate observed decisions, then evaluates counterfactual pairs in which only gender is flipped, estimating directional disparities while holding all other clinical factors constant. We study emergency triage, validating the approach on more than 150,000 admissions to the Bordeaux University Hospital (France) and replicating results on a subset of MIMIC-IV across a different language, population, and healthcare system. In the Bordeaux cohort, otherwise identical presentations were approximately 2.1% more likely to receive a lower-severity triage score when presented as female rather than male; scaled to national emergency volumes in France, this corresponds to more than 200,000 lower-severity assignments per year. Modality-specific analyses indicate that both explicit tabular gender indicators and implicit textual gender cues contribute to the disparity. Beyond emergency care, the approach supports bias audits in other settings (e.g., hiring, academic, and justice decisions), providing a scalable tool to detect and address inequities in real-world decision-making.

Related papers

• Epistemic-aware Vision-Language Foundation Model for Fetal Ultrasound Interpretation [83.02147613524032]
  We introduce FetalMind, a medical AI system tailored to fetal ultrasound for both report generation and diagnosis.<n>We propose Salient Epistemic Disentanglement (SED), which injects an expert-curated bipartite graph into the model to decouple view-disease associations.<n>FetalMind outperforms open- and closed-source baselines across all gestational stages, achieving +14% average gains and +61.2% higher accuracy on critical conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T19:57:03Z)
• Gender Bias in Large Language Models for Healthcare: Assignment Consistency and Clinical Implications [16.066280458640676]
  The integration of large language models into healthcare holds promise to enhance clinical decision-making.<n>Gender has long influenced physician behaviors and patient outcomes.<n>Some models even displayed a systematic female-male disparity in their interpretation of patient gender.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T01:11:06Z)
• Towards Fair Rankings: Leveraging LLMs for Gender Bias Detection and Measurement [6.92803536773427]
  Social biases in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Information Retrieval (IR) systems are an ongoing challenge.<n>We aim to address this issue by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect and measure gender bias in passage ranking.<n>We introduce a novel gender fairness metric, named Class-wise Weighted Exposure (CWEx), aiming to address existing limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T16:39:12Z)
• A Data-Centric Approach to Detecting and Mitigating Demographic Bias in Pediatric Mental Health Text: A Case Study in Anxiety Detection [3.874958704454859]
  We developed a data-centric de-biasing framework to address gender-based content disparities within clinical text.<n>Our approach demonstrates an effective strategy for mitigating bias in AI healthcare models trained on text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T20:00:22Z)
• The Root Shapes the Fruit: On the Persistence of Gender-Exclusive Harms in Aligned Language Models [91.86718720024825]
  We center transgender, nonbinary, and other gender-diverse identities to investigate how alignment procedures interact with pre-existing gender-diverse bias.<n>Our findings reveal that DPO-aligned models are particularly sensitive to supervised finetuning.<n>We conclude with recommendations tailored to DPO and broader alignment practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T06:50:50Z)
• How Can We Diagnose and Treat Bias in Large Language Models for Clinical Decision-Making? [2.7476176772825904]
  This research investigates the evaluation and mitigation of bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) We introduce a novel Counterfactual Patient Variations (CPV) dataset derived from the JAMA Clinical Challenge. Using this dataset, we built a framework for bias evaluation, employing both Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) and corresponding explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T23:14:10Z)
• GenderCARE: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing and Reducing Gender Bias in Large Language Models [73.23743278545321]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in natural language generation, but have also been observed to magnify societal biases.<n>GenderCARE is a comprehensive framework that encompasses innovative Criteria, bias Assessment, Reduction techniques, and Evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T15:35:46Z)
• Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
  Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders. This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words) We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z)
• GenderBias-\emph{VL}: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Vision Language Models via Counterfactual Probing [72.0343083866144]
  This paper introduces the GenderBias-emphVL benchmark to evaluate occupation-related gender bias in Large Vision-Language Models. Using our benchmark, we extensively evaluate 15 commonly used open-source LVLMs and state-of-the-art commercial APIs. Our findings reveal widespread gender biases in existing LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T05:55:15Z)
• Counter-GAP: Counterfactual Bias Evaluation through Gendered Ambiguous Pronouns [53.62845317039185]
  Bias-measuring datasets play a critical role in detecting biased behavior of language models. We propose a novel method to collect diverse, natural, and minimally distant text pairs via counterfactual generation. We show that four pre-trained language models are significantly more inconsistent across different gender groups than within each group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T12:11:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.