AI Workers, Geopolitics, and Algorithmic Collective Action
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17331v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 15:52:44 GMT
- Title: AI Workers, Geopolitics, and Algorithmic Collective Action
- Authors: Sydney Reis,
- Abstract summary: This paper argues that some AI workers can be considered actors of geopolitics.<n>It makes the case that governance alone cannot ensure responsible, ethical, or robust AI development and use.<n>It proposes engaging AI workers as sources of knowledge, relative power, and to encourage more responsible and just AI development.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: According to the theory of International Political Economy (IPE), states are often incentivized to rely on rather than constrain powerful corporations. For this reason, IPE provides a useful lens to explain why efforts to govern Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the international and national levels have thus far been developed, applied, and enforced unevenly. Building on recent work that explores how AI companies engage in geopolitics, this position paper argues that some AI workers can be considered actors of geopolitics. It makes the timely case that governance alone cannot ensure responsible, ethical, or robust AI development and use, and greater attention should be paid to bottom-up interventions at the site of AI development. AI workers themselves should be situated as individual agents of change, especially when considering their potential to foster Algorithmic Collective Action (ACA). Drawing on methods of Participatory Design (PD), this paper proposes engaging AI workers as sources of knowledge, relative power, and intentionality to encourage more responsible and just AI development and create the conditions that can facilitate ACA.
Related papers
- The AI Pyramid A Conceptual Framework for Workforce Capability in the Age of AI [2.134211474877041]
Recent evidence shows that generative AI disproportionately affects highly educated, white collar work.<n>This paper proposes the AI Pyramid, a conceptual framework for organizing human capability in an AI mediated economy.<n>The framework has implications for organizations, education systems, and governments seeking to align learning, measurement, and policy with the evolving demands of AI mediated work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-10T09:27:56Z) - Designing AI-Enabled Countermeasures to Cognitive Warfare [0.0]
Foreign information operations on social media platforms pose significant risks to democratic societies.<n>With the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), this threat is likely to intensify, potentially overwhelming human defenders.<n>This paper proposes possible AI-enabled countermeasures against cognitive warfare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-14T11:36:03Z) - Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict.<n>Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers.<n>We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z) - Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders [59.17981603969404]
The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts to facilitate transparency and support the governance of AI systems.
We conduct semi-structured interviews with 19 government, legal, and civil society stakeholders who inform policy and advocacy around responsible AI efforts.
We organize these beliefs into four barriers that help explain how RAI artifacts may (inadvertently) reconfigure power relations across civil society, government, and industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T00:14:37Z) - AI Procurement Checklists: Revisiting Implementation in the Age of AI Governance [18.290959557311552]
Public sector use of AI has been on the rise for the past decade, but only recently have efforts to enter it entered the cultural zeitgeist.
While simple to articulate, promoting ethical and effective roll outs of AI systems in government is a notoriously elusive task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T01:45:38Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power.
We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems.
There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them.
Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z) - Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans through Public Policy [0.0]
This essay outlines research on AI that learn structures in policy data that can be leveraged for downstream tasks.
We believe this represents the "comprehension" phase of AI and policy, but leveraging policy as a key source of human values to align AI requires "understanding" policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-25T21:31:14Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from a Survey
of Machine Learning Researchers [0.0]
Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) researchers play an important role in the ethics and governance of AI.
We conducted a survey of those who published in the top AI/ML conferences.
We find that AI/ML researchers place high levels of trust in international organizations and scientific organizations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-05T15:23:12Z) - The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI [4.729969944853141]
We argue that public distrust of AI originates from the under-development of a regulatory ecosystem that would guarantee the trustworthiness of the AIs that pervade society.
We elaborate the pivotal role of externally auditable AI documentation within this model and the work to be done to ensure it is effective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-22T22:01:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.