Tu crois que c'est vrai ? Diversite des regimes d'enonciation face aux fake news et mecanismes d'autoregulation conversationnelle

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18369v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 09:28:16 GMT
• Title: Tu crois que c'est vrai ? Diversite des regimes d'enonciation face aux fake news et mecanismes d'autoregulation conversationnelle
• Authors: Manon Berriche,
• Abstract summary: Two studies were carried out on Twitter and Facebook, combining quantitative analyses of digital traces with online observation and interviews.<n>The first study mapped users who shared at least one item labeled fake by fact-checkers in the French Twittersphere.<n>The second used a corpus of items flagged by Facebook users to study reactions to statements whose epistemic status is uncertain.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This thesis addresses two paradoxes: (1) why empirical studies find that fake news represent only a small share of the information consulted and shared on social media despite the absence of editorial control or journalistic norms, and (2) how political polarization has intensified even though users do not appear especially receptive to fake news. To investigate these issues, two complementary studies were carried out on Twitter and Facebook, combining quantitative analyses of digital traces with online observation and interviews. This mixed-methods design avoids reducing users to single reactions to identified fake items and instead examines the variety of practices across different interactional situations, online and offline, while recording socio-demographic traits. The first study mapped users who shared at least one item labeled fake by fact-checkers in the French Twittersphere. The second used a corpus of items flagged by Facebook users to study reactions to statements whose epistemic status is uncertain. Three main findings emerge. First, sharing fake news is concentrated among a limited group of users who are not less educated or cognitively disadvantaged but are more politicized and critical of institutions; owing to their high activity and prolific sharing, they can help set the agenda for their political camp. Second, exposed users can deploy varying forms of critical distance depending on their social position and the interactional norms of the situations they inhabit: either discursive caution (prudence énonciative) or interventions ('points d'arrêt') that express disagreement or corrections. Third, these forms of critical distance seldom yield genuine deliberative debates or agonistic pluralism; rather, they often produce dialogues of the deaf among a small, particularly active minority.

Related papers

• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Nothing Stands Alone: Relational Fake News Detection with Hypergraph Neural Networks [49.29141811578359]
  We propose to leverage a hypergraph to represent group-wise interaction among news, while focusing on important news relations with its dual-level attention mechanism. Our approach yields remarkable performance and maintains the high performance even with a small subset of labeled news data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-24T00:19:32Z)
• Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories [0.0]
  We propose that social-media users' own post histories are an underused resource for studying fake-news sharing. We identify cues that distinguish fake-news sharers, predict those most likely to share fake news, and identify promising constructs to build interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-20T14:26:20Z)
• The Spread of Propaganda by Coordinated Communities on Social Media [43.2770127582382]
  We analyze the spread of propaganda and its interplay with coordinated behavior on a large Twitter dataset about the 2019 UK general election. The combination of the use of propaganda and coordinated behavior allows us to uncover the authenticity and harmfulness of the different communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T13:39:10Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.