Strategic Decision Framework for Enterprise LLM Adoption
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18589v1
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 19:05:52 GMT
- Title: Strategic Decision Framework for Enterprise LLM Adoption
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) offer powerful capabilities in content generation, assisted coding, and process automation.<n>This article presents a systematic six-step decision framework for LLM adoption.<n>It provides practical guidance for business leaders to align technological capabilities with business objectives.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Organizations are rapidly adopting Large Language Models (LLMs) to transform their operations, yet they lack clear guidance on key decisions for adoption and implementation. While LLMs offer powerful capabilities in content generation, assisted coding, and process automation, businesses face critical challenges in data security, LLM solution development approach, infrastructure requirements, and deployment strategies. Healthcare providers must protect patient data while leveraging LLMs for medical analysis, financial institutions need to balance automated customer service with regulatory compliance, and software companies seek to enhance development productivity while maintaining code security. This article presents a systematic six-step decision framework for LLM adoption, helping organizations navigate from initial application selection to final deployment. Based on extensive interviews and analysis of successful and failed implementations, our framework provides practical guidance for business leaders to align technological capabilities with business objectives. Through key decision points and real-world examples from both B2B and B2C contexts, organizations can make informed decisions about LLM adoption while ensuring secure and efficient integration across various use cases, from customer service automation to content creation and advanced analytics.
Related papers
- Generative AI in Systems Engineering: A Framework for Risk Assessment of Large Language Models [0.8062120534124607]
The increasing use of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers significant opportunities across the engineering lifecycle.<n>This paper introduces the LLM Risk Assessment Framework (LRF), a structured approach for evaluating the application of LLMs within Systems Engineering environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T09:30:11Z) - Towards Verifiably Safe Tool Use for LLM Agents [53.55621104327779]
Large language model (LLM)-based AI agents extend capabilities by enabling access to tools such as data sources, APIs, search engines, code sandboxes, and even other agents.<n>LLMs may invoke unintended tool interactions and introduce risks, such as leaking sensitive data or overwriting critical records.<n>Current approaches to mitigate these risks, such as model-based safeguards, enhance agents' reliability but cannot guarantee system safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T21:31:38Z) - Responsible LLM Deployment for High-Stake Decisions by Decentralized Technologies and Human-AI Interactions [1.2464143741310136]
This paper proposes a framework for responsible deployment of LLM-based decision-support systems through active human involvement.<n>It integrates interactive collaboration between human experts and developers through multiple iterations at the pre-deployment stage.<n>It was tested on Bert-large-uncased, MistLaMA 2 and LLaMA 3 models to assess the capability to support responsible financial decisions on business lending.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T18:10:52Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on Benchmarks and Solutions in Software Engineering of LLM-Empowered Agentic System [56.40989626804489]
This survey provides the first holistic analysis of Large Language Models-powered software engineering.<n>We review over 150 recent papers and propose a taxonomy along two key dimensions: (1) Solutions, categorized into prompt-based, fine-tuning-based, and agent-based paradigms, and (2) Benchmarks, including tasks such as code generation, translation, and repair.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T06:56:50Z) - ORMind: A Cognitive-Inspired End-to-End Reasoning Framework for Operations Research [56.961539386979354]
We introduce ORMind, a cognitive-inspired framework that enhances optimization through counterfactual reasoning.<n>Our approach emulates human cognition, implementing an end-to-end workflow that transforms requirements into mathematical models and executable code.<n>It is currently being tested internally in Lenovo's AI Assistant, with plans to enhance optimization capabilities for both business and consumer customers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T05:11:21Z) - LLM-Powered AI Agent Systems and Their Applications in Industry [3.103098467546532]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have reshaped agent systems.<n>Unlike traditional rule-based agents with limited task scope, LLM-powered agents offer greater flexibility, cross-domain reasoning, and natural language interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T01:52:15Z) - Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks.<n>However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback.<n>We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z) - Global Challenge for Safe and Secure LLMs Track 1 [57.08717321907755]
The Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs) is a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO)
This paper introduces the Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs), a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) to foster the development of advanced defense mechanisms against automated jailbreaking attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T08:20:31Z) - Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making [85.24399869971236]
We aim to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for embodied decision making.<n>Existing evaluations tend to rely solely on a final success rate.<n>We propose a generalized interface (Embodied Agent Interface) that supports the formalization of various types of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T17:59:00Z) - Large Language Model as a Catalyst: A Paradigm Shift in Base Station Siting Optimization [62.16747639440893]
Large language models (LLMs) and their associated technologies advance, particularly in the realms of prompt engineering and agent engineering.<n>Our proposed framework incorporates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to enhance the system's ability to acquire domain-specific knowledge and generate solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-07T08:43:32Z) - On Large Language Models in National Security Applications [2.7624021966289605]
The overwhelming success of GPT-4 in early 2023 highlighted the transformative potential of large language models (LLMs) across various sectors, including national security.
This article explores the implications of LLM integration within national security contexts, analyzing their potential to revolutionize information processing, decision-making, and operational efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T18:53:22Z) - FinMem: A Performance-Enhanced LLM Trading Agent with Layered Memory and
Character Design [11.913409501633616]
textscFinMem is a novel LLM-based agent framework devised for financial decision-making.
textscFinMem's memory module aligns closely with the cognitive structure of human traders, offering robust interpretability.
This framework enables the agent to self-evolve its professional knowledge, react agilely to new investment cues, and continuously refine trading decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T00:24:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.