REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Disentangling Truth into Style and Substance
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20233v2
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:08:27 GMT
- Title: REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Disentangling Truth into Style and Substance
- Authors: Chuyi Kong, Gao Wei, Jing Ma, Hongzhan Lin, Yaxin Fan,
- Abstract summary: We propose REason-guided Fact-checking with Latent EXplanations REFLEX paradigm.<n>It is a plug-and-play, self-refining paradigm that leverages the internal knowledge in backbone model to improve both verdict accuracy and explanation quality.<n>With only 465 self-refined training samples, RELFEX achieves state-of-the-art performance.
- Score: 14.932352020762991
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The prevalence of misinformation on social media threatens public trust, demanding automated fact-checking systems that provide accurate verdicts with interpretable explanations. However, existing large language model-based (LLM-based) approaches often rely heavily on external knowledge sources, introducing substantial latency and even hallucinations that undermine reliability, interpretability, and responsiveness, which is crucial for real-time use. To address these challenges, we propose REason-guided Fact-checking with Latent EXplanations REFLEX paradigm, a plug-and-play, self-refining paradigm that leverages the internal knowledge in backbone model to improve both verdict accuracy and explanation quality. REFLEX reformulates fact-checking as a role-play dialogue and jointly trains verdict prediction and explanation generation. It adaptively extracts contrastive activation pairs between the backbone model and its fine-tuned variant to construct steering vectors that disentangle truth into style and substance naturally. These activation-level signals guide inference and suppress noisy explanations, enabling more faithful and efficient reasoning. Experiments on real-world datasets show that REFLEX outperforms previous methods that steer toward a single truth direction and underscores the challenge traditional approaches face when handling the subtle, human-unknown truth in fact-checking tasks. Remarkably, with only 465 self-refined training samples, RELFEX achieves state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, models trained with explanatory objectives can effectively guide those without them, yielding up to a 7.57% improvement, highlighting that internal explanation signals play a dual role in both interpreting and enhancing factual reasoning.
Related papers
- Leveraging LLM Parametric Knowledge for Fact Checking without Retrieval [60.25608870901428]
Trustworthiness is a core research challenge for agentic AI systems built on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose the task of fact-checking without retrieval, focusing on the verification of arbitrary natural language claims, independent of their source robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T18:42:51Z) - CoG: Controllable Graph Reasoning via Relational Blueprints and Failure-Aware Refinement over Knowledge Graphs [53.199517625701475]
CoG is a training-free framework inspired by Dual-Process Theory that mimics the interplay between intuition and deliberation.<n>CoG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both accuracy and efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T07:27:40Z) - Towards Comprehensive Stage-wise Benchmarking of Large Language Models in Fact-Checking [64.97768177044355]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world fact-checking systems.<n>We present FactArena, a fully automated arena-style evaluation framework.<n>Our analyses reveal significant discrepancies between static claim-verification accuracy and end-to-end fact-checking competence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T02:51:56Z) - Fact-Checking with Large Language Models via Probabilistic Certainty and Consistency [7.806516365113592]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in applications requiring factual accuracy.<n>While fact-checking can mitigate these errors, existing methods typically retrieve external evidence indiscriminately.<n>We introduce Probabilistic Certainty and Consistency (PCC), a framework that estimates factual confidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-05T21:57:41Z) - Factuality and Transparency Are All RAG Needs! Self-Explaining Contrastive Evidence Re-ranking [0.2864713389096699]
This extended abstract introduces Self-Explaining Contrastive Evidence Re-Ranking (CER)<n>CER restructures retrieval around factual evidence by fine-tuning embeddings with contrastive learning and generating token-level attribution rationales for each retrieved passage.<n>We evaluated our method on clinical trial reports, and initial experimental results show that CER improves retrieval accuracy, mitigates the potential for hallucinations in RAG systems, and provides transparent, evidence-based retrieval that enhances reliability, especially in safety-critical domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-04T17:24:35Z) - Adaptive Residual-Update Steering for Low-Overhead Hallucination Mitigation in Large Vision Language Models [13.32858759983739]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often suffer from object hallucination, generating text inconsistent with visual inputs.<n>Existing inference-time interventions to mitigate this issue present a challenging trade-off.<n>We present Residual-Update Directed DEcoding Regulation (RUDDER), a framework that steers LVLMs towards visually-grounded generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T13:29:38Z) - COMPASS: Context-Modulated PID Attention Steering System for Hallucination Mitigation [2.1521364454860525]
We introduce a lightweight, interpretable control framework that embeds a model-based feedback loop directly within decoding.<n>We show that a PID controller dynamically modulates attention heads to maintain factual consistency without retraining or multi-pass decoding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-05T05:30:28Z) - DeLeaker: Dynamic Inference-Time Reweighting For Semantic Leakage Mitigation in Text-to-Image Models [55.30555646945055]
Text-to-Image (T2I) models are vulnerable to semantic leakage.<n>We introduce DeLeaker, a lightweight approach that mitigates leakage by directly intervening on the model's attention maps.<n>SLIM is the first dataset dedicated to semantic leakage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T17:39:21Z) - Self-Consistency as a Free Lunch: Reducing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models via Self-Reflection [71.8243083897721]
Vision-language models often hallucinate details, generating non-existent objects or inaccurate attributes that compromise output reliability.<n>We present a novel framework that leverages the model's self-consistency between long responses and short answers to generate preference pairs for training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T10:37:11Z) - Reflect then Learn: Active Prompting for Information Extraction Guided by Introspective Confusion [41.79586757544166]
Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable potential for few-shot information extraction (IE)<n> Conventional selection strategies often fail to provide informative guidance, as they overlook a key source of model fallibility.<n>We introduce Active Prompting for Information Extraction (APIE), a novel active prompting framework guided by a principle we term introspective confusion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-10T02:27:41Z) - Exploring and Exploiting the Inherent Efficiency within Large Reasoning Models for Self-Guided Efficiency Enhancement [101.77467538102924]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit overthinking, which hinders efficiency and inflates inference cost.<n>We propose two lightweight methods to enhance LRM efficiency.<n>First, we introduce Efficiency Steering, a training-free activation steering technique that modulates reasoning behavior via a single direction.<n>Second, we develop Self-Rewarded Efficiency RL, a reinforcement learning framework that dynamically balances task accuracy and brevity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T17:18:12Z) - Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards [67.86091419220816]
Large Language Models (LLMs) show great promise in complex reasoning.<n>A prevalent issue is superficial self-reflection'', where models fail to robustly verify their own outputs.<n>We introduce RISE (Reinforcing Reasoning with Self-Verification), a novel online RL framework designed to tackle this.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T17:59:31Z) - TrendFact: A Benchmark for Explainable Hotspot Perception in Fact-Checking with Natural Language Explanation [9.221637941193606]
We introduce TrendFact, the first benchmark capable of evaluating hotspot perception ability (HPA) and all fact-checking tasks.<n> TrendFact consists of 7,643 curated samples sourced from trending platforms and professional fact-checking datasets.<n>We also propose FactISR, a reasoning framework that integrates dynamic evidence augmentation with influence score-based iterative self-reflection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-19T15:25:19Z) - FactCHD: Benchmarking Fact-Conflicting Hallucination Detection [64.4610684475899]
FactCHD is a benchmark designed for the detection of fact-conflicting hallucinations from LLMs.
FactCHD features a diverse dataset that spans various factuality patterns, including vanilla, multi-hop, comparison, and set operation.
We introduce Truth-Triangulator that synthesizes reflective considerations by tool-enhanced ChatGPT and LoRA-tuning based on Llama2.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-18T16:27:49Z) - A Controllable Model of Grounded Response Generation [122.7121624884747]
Current end-to-end neural conversation models inherently lack the flexibility to impose semantic control in the response generation process.
We propose a framework that we call controllable grounded response generation (CGRG)
We show that using this framework, a transformer based model with a novel inductive attention mechanism, trained on a conversation-like Reddit dataset, outperforms strong generation baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T21:22:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.