Self-Guided Defense: Adaptive Safety Alignment for Reasoning Models via Synthesized Guidelines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21214v2
• Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 14:07:43 GMT
• Title: Self-Guided Defense: Adaptive Safety Alignment for Reasoning Models via Synthesized Guidelines
• Authors: Yuhang Wang, Yanxu Zhu, Dongyuan Lu, Jitao Sang,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Synthesized Guideline-based Adaptive Safety Alignment (SGASA) framework.<n>It internalizes model-generated safety guidelines to strengthen models' ability to enhance robustness against adversarial prompts.<n> experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that SGASA significantly improves model safety, validating its adaptive and scalable effectiveness.
• Score: 31.031589383127677
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reasoning models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks. However, ensuring their safety against adversarial jailbreak prompts remains a critical challenge. Due to the covert and deceptive nature of such prompts, they can often evade built-in safety mechanisms and lead to the generation of harmful content. This underscores the need for an adaptive safety alignment approach that enables models to autonomously reinforce their defenses in response to adversarial inputs. This paper introduces the Synthesized Guideline-based Adaptive Safety Alignment (SGASA) framework, which internalizes model-generated safety guidelines to strengthen models' ability to enhance robustness against harmful adversarial prompts while minimizing unnecessary refusals of benign requests. SGASA consists of two key stages: Data Pre-synthesis, which generates safety guidelines and augmented prompts; and Alignment Fine-tuning, which leverages Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to embed these guidelines into the model. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that SGASA significantly improves model safety, validating its adaptive and scalable effectiveness.

Related papers

• Steering Externalities: Benign Activation Steering Unintentionally Increases Jailbreak Risk for Large Language Models [62.16655896700062]
  Activation steering is a technique to enhance the utility of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We show that it unintentionally introduces critical and under-explored safety risks.<n>Experiments reveal that these interventions act as a force multiplier, creating new vulnerabilities to jailbreaks and increasing attack success rates to over 80% on standard benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T12:32:35Z)
• Self-Guard: Defending Large Reasoning Models via enhanced self-reflection [54.775612141528164]
  Self-Guard is a lightweight safety defense framework for Large Reasoning Models.<n>It bridges the awareness-compliance gap, achieving robust safety performance without compromising model utility.<n>Self-Guard exhibits strong generalization across diverse unseen risks and varying model scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T13:06:11Z)
• Rethinking Safety in LLM Fine-tuning: An Optimization Perspective [56.31306558218838]
  We show that poor optimization choices, rather than inherent trade-offs, often cause safety problems, measured as harmful responses to adversarial prompts.<n>We propose a simple exponential moving average (EMA) momentum technique in parameter space that preserves safety performance.<n>Our experiments on the Llama families across multiple datasets demonstrate that safety problems can largely be avoided without specialized interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T23:46:36Z)
• Shape it Up! Restoring LLM Safety during Finetuning [65.75757313781104]
  Finetuning large language models (LLMs) enables user-specific customization but introduces critical safety risks.<n>We propose dynamic safety shaping (DSS), a framework that uses fine-grained safety signals to reinforce learning from safe segments of a response while suppressing unsafe content.<n>We present STAR-DSS, guided by STAR scores, that robustly mitigates finetuning risks and delivers substantial safety improvements across diverse threats, datasets, and model families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T18:05:16Z)
• LookAhead Tuning: Safer Language Models via Partial Answer Previews [62.529794567687354]
  Fine-tuning enables large language models to adapt to specific domains, but often compromises their previously established safety alignment.<n>We introduce LookAhead Tuning, a lightweight and effective data-driven approach that preserves safety during fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T18:11:42Z)
• Detect-and-Guide: Self-regulation of Diffusion Models for Safe Text-to-Image Generation via Guideline Token Optimization [22.225141381422873]
  There is a growing concern about text-to-image diffusion models creating harmful content.<n>Post-hoc model intervention techniques, such as concept unlearning and safety guidance, have been developed to mitigate these risks.<n>We propose the safe generation framework Detect-and-Guide (DAG) to perform self-diagnosis and fine-interpret self-regulation.<n>DAG achieves state-of-the-art safe generation performance, balancing harmfulness mitigation and text-following performance on real-world prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T13:37:52Z)
• Safe to Serve: Aligning Instruction-Tuned Models for Safety and Helpfulness [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning and text generation.<n>LLMs can inadvertently generate unsafe or biased responses when prompted with problematic inputs.<n>This research addresses the critical challenge of developing language models that generate both helpful and harmless content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T06:52:22Z)
• Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training [67.30423823744506]
  We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position.<n>DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful response sequence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T09:36:33Z)
• On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language Models [172.13943777203377]
  We find that in the representation space, the input queries are typically moved by safety prompts in a "higher-refusal" direction. Inspired by these findings, we propose a method for safety prompt optimization, namely DRO. Treating a safety prompt as continuous, trainable embeddings, DRO learns to move the queries' representations along or opposite the refusal direction, depending on their harmfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T17:28:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.