Causality Without Causal Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21260v1
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:41:25 GMT
- Title: Causality Without Causal Models
- Authors: Joseph Y. Halpern, Rafael Pass,
- Abstract summary: We abstract the definition of (actual) causality, so that it can be applied to any other model where counterfactuals are defined.<n>Not only can we apply the definition in a wider range of models, including ones that allow, for example, backtracking, but we can apply the definition to determine if A is a cause of B even if A and B are formulas involving disjunctions, negations, beliefs, and nested counterfactuals.
- Score: 12.083361075209877
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Perhaps the most prominent current definition of (actual) causality is due to Halpern and Pearl. It is defined using causal models (also known as structural equations models). We abstract the definition, extracting its key features, so that it can be applied to any other model where counterfactuals are defined. By abstracting the definition, we gain a number of benefits. Not only can we apply the definition in a wider range of models, including ones that allow, for example, backtracking, but we can apply the definition to determine if A is a cause of B even if A and B are formulas involving disjunctions, negations, beliefs, and nested counterfactuals (none of which can be handled by the Halpern-Pearl definition). Moreover, we can extend the ideas to getting an abstract definition of explanation that can be applied beyond causal models. Finally, we gain a deeper understanding of features of the definition even in causal models.
Related papers
- From Black-box to Causal-box: Towards Building More Interpretable Models [57.23201263629627]
We introduce the notion of causal interpretability, which formalizes when counterfactual queries can be evaluated from a specific class of models.<n>We derive a complete graphical criterion that determines whether a given model architecture supports a given counterfactual query.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T20:03:18Z) - Topos Causal Models [3.0316063849624477]
We propose topos causal models (TCMs), a class of causal models that exploit the key properties of a topos category.<n>The main goal of this paper is to show that these properties are central to many applications in causal inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-05T21:50:57Z) - Actual Causation and Nondeterministic Causal Models [7.550566004119157]
I take advantage of the increased expressivity offered by nondeterministic causal models to offer a novel definition of actual causation.<n>Although novel, the resulting definition arrives at verdicts that are almost identical to those of my previous definition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-10T20:53:47Z) - A Complexity-Based Theory of Compositionality [53.025566128892066]
In AI, compositional representations can enable a powerful form of out-of-distribution generalization.<n>Here, we propose a definition, which we call representational compositionality, that accounts for and extends our intuitions about compositionality.<n>We show how it unifies disparate intuitions from across the literature in both AI and cognitive science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T18:37:27Z) - Abductive explanations of classifiers under constraints: Complexity and properties [6.629765271909503]
We propose three new types of explanations that take into account constraints.
They can be generated from the whole feature space or from a dataset.
We show that coverage is powerful enough to discard redundant and superfluous AXp's.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T17:15:39Z) - A Causal Analysis of Harm [18.7822411439221]
There is a growing need for a legal and regulatory framework to address when and how autonomous systems harm someone.
This paper formally defines a qualitative notion of harm that uses causal models and is based on a well-known definition of actual causality.
We show that our definition is able to handle the examples from the literature, and illustrate its importance for reasoning about situations involving autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-11T10:36:24Z) - Distance Based Image Classification: A solution to generative
classification's conundrum? [70.43638559782597]
We argue that discriminative boundaries are counter-intuitive as they define semantics by what-they-are-not.
We propose a new generative model in which semantic factors are accommodated by shell theory's hierarchical generative process.
We use the model to develop a classification scheme which suppresses the impact of noise while preserving semantic cues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-04T03:35:13Z) - Variational Causal Networks: Approximate Bayesian Inference over Causal
Structures [132.74509389517203]
We introduce a parametric variational family modelled by an autoregressive distribution over the space of discrete DAGs.
In experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed variational posterior is able to provide a good approximation of the true posterior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T17:52:49Z) - Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs.
We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables.
We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z) - The Struggles of Feature-Based Explanations: Shapley Values vs. Minimal
Sufficient Subsets [61.66584140190247]
We show that feature-based explanations pose problems even for explaining trivial models.
We show that two popular classes of explainers, Shapley explainers and minimal sufficient subsets explainers, target fundamentally different types of ground-truth explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-23T09:45:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.