CompARE: A Computational framework for Airborne Respiratory disease Evaluation integrating flow physics and human behavior
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21782v1
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 12:53:30 GMT
- Title: CompARE: A Computational framework for Airborne Respiratory disease Evaluation integrating flow physics and human behavior
- Authors: Fong Yew Leong, Jaeyoung Kwak, Zhengwei Ge, Chin Chun Ooi, Siew-Wai Fong, Matthew Zirui Tay, Hua Qian, Chang Wei Kang, Wentong Cai, Hongying Li,
- Abstract summary: The risk of indoor airborne transmission among co-located individuals is generally non-uniform.<n>We present CompARE, an integrated risk assessment framework for indoor airborne disease transmission.
- Score: 4.272788079372737
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The risk of indoor airborne transmission among co-located individuals is generally non-uniform, which remains a critical challenge for public health modelling. Thus, we present CompARE, an integrated risk assessment framework for indoor airborne disease transmission that reveals a striking bimodal distribution of infection risk driven by airflow dynamics and human behavior. Combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD), machine learning (ML), and agent-based modeling (ABM), our model captures the complex interplay between aerosol transport, human mobility, and environmental context. Based on a prototypical childcare center, our approach quantifies how incorporation of ABM can unveil significantly different infection risk profiles across agents, with more than two-fold change in risk of infection between the individuals with the lowest and highest risks in more than 90% of cases, despite all individuals being in the same overall environment. We found that infection risk distributions can exhibit not only a striking bimodal pattern in certain activities but also exponential decay and fat-tailed behavior in others. Specifically, we identify low-risk modes arising from source containment, as well as high-risk tails from prolonged close contact. Our approach enables near-real-time scenario analysis and provides policy-relevant quantitative insights into how ventilation design, spatial layout, and social distancing policies can mitigate transmission risk. These findings challenge simple distance-based heuristics and support the design of targeted, evidence-based interventions in high-occupancy indoor settings.
Related papers
- Causal and Federated Multimodal Learning for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction under Heterogeneous Populations [0.0]
We create a single multimodal learning framework that integrates cross modal transformers with graph neural networks and causal representation learning to measure personalized CVD risk.<n>The model combines genomic variation, cardiac MRI, ECG waveforms, wearable streams, and structured EHR data to predict risk.<n>This study paves the way for a principled approach to clinically trustworthy, interpretable and privacy respecting CVD prediction at the population level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-05T14:32:49Z) - RADAR: A Risk-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Framework for LLM Safety Evaluation via Role-Specialized Collaboration [81.38705556267917]
Existing safety evaluation methods for large language models (LLMs) suffer from inherent limitations.<n>We introduce a theoretical framework that reconstructs the underlying risk concept space.<n>We propose RADAR, a multi-agent collaborative evaluation framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T09:35:32Z) - Adaptable Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction from Heterogeneous Data using Large Language Models [70.64969663547703]
AdaCVD is an adaptable CVD risk prediction framework built on large language models extensively fine-tuned on over half a million participants from the UK Biobank.<n>It addresses key clinical challenges across three dimensions: it flexibly incorporates comprehensive yet variable patient information; it seamlessly integrates both structured data and unstructured text; and it rapidly adapts to new patient populations using minimal additional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T14:42:02Z) - CRISP-NAM: Competing Risks Interpretable Survival Prediction with Neural Additive Models [0.22940141855172033]
CRISP-NAM is an interpretable neural additive model for competing risks survival analysis.<n>Each feature contributes independently to risk estimation through dedicated neural networks.<n>We demonstrate competitive performance on multiple datasets compared to existing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T15:52:15Z) - MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data
Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion.
It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space.
It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z) - Agent-Based Model: Simulating a Virus Expansion Based on the Acceptance
of Containment Measures [65.62256987706128]
Compartmental epidemiological models categorize individuals based on their disease status.
We propose an ABM architecture that combines an adapted SEIRD model with a decision-making model for citizens.
We illustrate the designed model by examining the progression of SARS-CoV-2 infections in A Coruna, Spain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-28T08:01:05Z) - Two steps to risk sensitivity [4.974890682815778]
conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) is a risk measure for modeling human and animal planning.
We adopt a conventional distributional approach to CVaR in a sequential setting and reanalyze the choices of human decision-makers.
We then consider a further critical property of risk sensitivity, namely time consistency, showing alternatives to this form of CVaR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-12T16:27:47Z) - Towards Accurate Spatiotemporal COVID-19 Risk Scores using High
Resolution Real-World Mobility Data [15.302926747159557]
We develop a Hawkes process-based technique to assign relatively fine-grain spatial and temporal risk scores.
We focus on developing risk scores based on location density and mobility behaviour.
Our results show that fine-grain risk scores based on high-resolution mobility data can provide useful insights and facilitate safe re-opening.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-14T06:31:28Z) - Infection Risk Score: Identifying the risk of infection propagation
based on human contact [4.080171822768553]
We introduce an infection risk score that provides an estimate of the infection risk arising from human contacts.
Using a real-world human contact dataset, we show that the proposed risk score can provide a realistic estimate of the level of risk in the population.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-26T13:25:06Z) - Epidemic mitigation by statistical inference from contact tracing data [61.04165571425021]
We develop Bayesian inference methods to estimate the risk that an individual is infected.
We propose to use probabilistic risk estimation in order to optimize testing and quarantining strategies for the control of an epidemic.
Our approaches translate into fully distributed algorithms that only require communication between individuals who have recently been in contact.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-20T12:24:45Z) - A General Framework for Survival Analysis and Multi-State Modelling [70.31153478610229]
We use neural ordinary differential equations as a flexible and general method for estimating multi-state survival models.
We show that our model exhibits state-of-the-art performance on popular survival data sets and demonstrate its efficacy in a multi-state setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T19:24:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.