Enhancing Trustworthiness with Mixed Precision: Benchmarks, Opportunities, and Challenges

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22483v1
• Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 14:17:43 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Trustworthiness with Mixed Precision: Benchmarks, Opportunities, and Challenges
• Authors: Guanxi Lu, Hao Mark Chen, Zhiqiang Que, Wayne Luk, Hongxiang Fan,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising performance across various tasks.<n>LLMs' autoregressive decoding process poses significant challenges for efficient deployment on existing AI hardware.
• Score: 12.438306093697
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising performance across various tasks. However, their autoregressive decoding process poses significant challenges for efficient deployment on existing AI hardware. Quantization alleviates memory and compute pressure by compressing weights, activations, and KV caches to low precisions while preserving generation quality. However, existing quantization frameworks typically focus on perplexity or classification accuracy, often omitting critical trustworthiness metrics. This gap introduces risks when applying quantized LLMs to downstream high-stakes domains such as finance and healthcare. In this work, we systematically investigate the impact of quantization on four trustworthiness metrics (adversarial robustness, fairness, machine ethics, and out-of-distribution robustness) and identify the instability across compression ratios and quantization methods. Building on these observations, we develop a novel precision-ensemble voting approach that leverages predictions from mixed-precision variants of the same model and consistently improves performance by up to $5.8\%$ on trustworthiness metrics. Our results highlight the importance of considering trustworthiness when developing model compression techniques and point to research opportunities at the intersection of compression and trustworthiness for safety-critical applications.

Related papers

• Open-World Deepfake Attribution via Confidence-Aware Asymmetric Learning [78.92934995292113]
  We propose a Confidence-Aware Asymmetric Learning (CAL) framework, which balances confidence across known and novel forgery types.<n>CAL consistently outperforms previous methods, achieving new state-of-the-art performance on both known and novel forgery attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T12:31:28Z)
• Confidence-Based Response Abstinence: Improving LLM Trustworthiness via Activation-Based Uncertainty Estimation [7.3923284353934875]
  We propose a method for confidence estimation in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems that aligns closely with the correctness of large language model (LLM) outputs.<n>Our approach extends prior uncertainty quantification methods by leveraging raw feed-forward network (FFN) activations as auto-regressive signals.<n>Our results demonstrate that activation-based confidence modeling offers a scalable, architecture-aware path toward trustworthy RAG deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T16:55:56Z)
• MaP: A Unified Framework for Reliable Evaluation of Pre-training Dynamics [72.00014675808228]
  Instability in Large Language Models evaluation process obscures true learning dynamics.<n>We introduce textbfMaP, a framework that integrates underlineMerging underlineand the underlinePass@k metric.<n>Experiments show that MaP yields significantly smoother performance curves, reduces inter-run variance, and ensures more consistent rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T11:40:27Z)
• AQUA-LLM: Evaluating Accuracy, Quantization, and Adversarial Robustness Trade-offs in LLMs for Cybersecurity Question Answering [8.946002046630845]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong potential for cybersecurity question answering (QA)<n>Their substantial computational demands pose significant challenges for deployment on resource-constrained edge devices.<n>We propose AQUA-LLM, an evaluation framework designed to benchmark several state-of-the-art small LLMs under four distinct configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T20:19:24Z)
• Data-Driven Calibration of Prediction Sets in Large Vision-Language Models Based on Inductive Conformal Prediction [0.0]
  We propose a model-agnostic uncertainty quantification method that integrates dynamic threshold calibration and cross-modal consistency verification.<n>We show that the framework achieves stable performance across varying calibration-to-test split ratios, underscoring its robustness for real-world deployment in healthcare, autonomous systems, and other safety-sensitive domains.<n>This work bridges the gap between theoretical reliability and practical applicability in multi-modal AI systems, offering a scalable solution for hallucination detection and uncertainty-aware decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T15:39:46Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reliability via Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling [41.19330514054401]
  Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucination stemming from misaligned self-awareness.<n>We propose the Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling framework to integrate fast and slow reasoning systems to harmonize reliability and usability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:16:02Z)
• Uncertainty separation via ensemble quantile regression [23.667247644930708]
  This paper introduces a novel and scalable framework for uncertainty estimation and separation.<n>Our framework is scalable to large datasets and demonstrates superior performance on synthetic benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T11:15:32Z)
• Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework [54.40508478482667]
  We present a comprehensive framework to disentangle, quantify, and mitigate uncertainty in perception and plan generation.<n>We propose methods tailored to the unique properties of perception and decision-making.<n>We show that our uncertainty disentanglement framework reduces variability by up to 40% and enhances task success rates by 5% compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T17:32:00Z)
• Decoding Compressed Trust: Scrutinizing the Trustworthiness of Efficient LLMs Under Compression [109.23761449840222]
  This study conducts the first, thorough evaluation of leading Large Language Models (LLMs) We find that quantization is currently a more effective approach than pruning in achieving efficiency and trustworthiness simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T01:38:19Z)
• RobustMQ: Benchmarking Robustness of Quantized Models [54.15661421492865]
  Quantization is an essential technique for deploying deep neural networks (DNNs) on devices with limited resources. We thoroughly evaluated the robustness of quantized models against various noises (adrial attacks, natural corruptions, and systematic noises) on ImageNet. Our research contributes to advancing the robust quantization of models and their deployment in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T14:37:12Z)
• Probabilistic robust linear quadratic regulators with Gaussian processes [73.0364959221845]
  Probabilistic models such as Gaussian processes (GPs) are powerful tools to learn unknown dynamical systems from data for subsequent use in control design. We present a novel controller synthesis for linearized GP dynamics that yields robust controllers with respect to a probabilistic stability margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T08:36:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.