Use of Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model Agent for Long-Form COVID-19 Fact-Checking
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00007v1
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:10:46 GMT
- Title: Use of Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model Agent for Long-Form COVID-19 Fact-Checking
- Abstract summary: This study presents SAFE (system for accurate extraction and evaluation), an agent system that combines large language models with retrieval-augmented generation.<n> SAFE includes two agents - one for claim extraction and another for claim verification.<n>An enhanced variant, SAFELOTR-RAG + SRAG, incorporates Self-RAG to refine retrieval via query rewriting.
- Score: 2.7768742946084077
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: The COVID-19 infodemic calls for scalable fact-checking solutions that handle long-form misinformation with accuracy and reliability. This study presents SAFE (system for accurate fact extraction and evaluation), an agent system that combines large language models with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to improve automated fact-checking of long-form COVID-19 misinformation. SAFE includes two agents - one for claim extraction and another for claim verification using LOTR-RAG, which leverages a 130,000-document COVID-19 research corpus. An enhanced variant, SAFE (LOTR-RAG + SRAG), incorporates Self-RAG to refine retrieval via query rewriting. We evaluated both systems on 50 fake news articles (2-17 pages) containing 246 annotated claims (M = 4.922, SD = 3.186), labeled as true (14.1%), partly true (14.4%), false (27.0%), partly false (2.2%), and misleading (21.0%) by public health professionals. SAFE systems significantly outperformed baseline LLMs in all metrics (p < 0.001). For consistency (0-1 scale), SAFE (LOTR-RAG) scored 0.629, exceeding both SAFE (+SRAG) (0.577) and the baseline (0.279). In subjective evaluations (0-4 Likert scale), SAFE (LOTR-RAG) also achieved the highest average ratings in usefulness (3.640), clearness (3.800), and authenticity (3.526). Adding SRAG slightly reduced overall performance, except for a minor gain in clearness. SAFE demonstrates robust improvements in long-form COVID-19 fact-checking by addressing LLM limitations in consistency and explainability. The core LOTR-RAG design proved more effective than its SRAG-augmented variant, offering a strong foundation for scalable misinformation mitigation.
Related papers
- Trust but Verify: Introducing DAVinCI -- A Framework for Dual Attribution and Verification in Claim Inference for Language Models [53.279391576560755]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable fluency and versatility across a wide range of NLP tasks, yet they remain prone to factual inaccuracies and limitation.<n>This poses significant risks in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, law, and scientific communication, where trust and verifiability are paramount.<n>We introduce DAVinCI - a Dual Attribution and Verification framework designed to enhance the factual reliability and interpretability of LLM outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-23T01:37:50Z) - Legal RAG Bench: an end-to-end benchmark for legal RAG [0.0]
We introduce Legal RAG Bench, a benchmark and evaluation methodology for assessing the end-to-end performance of legal RAG systems.<n>Legal RAG Bench consists of 4,876 passages from the Victorian Criminal Charge Book alongside 100 complex, hand-crafted questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T10:34:28Z) - NAACL: Noise-AwAre Verbal Confidence Calibration for LLMs in RAG Systems [53.52419750390942]
Large language models (LLMs) are used in mission-critical factual domains.<n>LLMs exhibit poor calibration performance due to noisy retrieved contexts.<n>We propose NAACL Rules (Noise-AwAre Confidence CaLibration Rules) to provide a principled foundation for resolving overconfidence under noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T05:38:25Z) - L-RAG: Balancing Context and Retrieval with Entropy-Based Lazy Loading [0.0]
Reval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as the predominant paradigm for grounding Large Language outputs in factual knowledge.<n>We introduce L-RAG, an adaptive framework that implements hierarchical context management through entropy gating.<n>L-RAG offers a practical, training-free approach toward more efficient RAG deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-10T12:25:19Z) - AI Security Beyond Core Domains: Resume Screening as a Case Study of Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Specialized LLM Applications [71.27518152526686]
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at text comprehension and generation, making them ideal for automated tasks like code review and content moderation.<n>LLMs can be manipulated by "adversarial instructions" hidden in input data, such as resumes or code, causing them to deviate from their intended task.<n>This paper introduces a benchmark to assess this vulnerability in resume screening, revealing attack success rates exceeding 80% for certain attack types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T08:42:09Z) - Bidirectional RAG: Safe Self-Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation Through Multi-Stage Validation [0.0]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation RAG systems enhance large language models by grounding responses in external knowledge bases.<n>We introduce Bidirectional RAG, a novel RAG architecture that enables safe corpus expansion through validated write back of high quality generated responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-20T19:42:42Z) - Eigen-1: Adaptive Multi-Agent Refinement with Monitor-Based RAG for Scientific Reasoning [53.45095336430027]
We develop a unified framework that combines implicit retrieval and structured collaboration.<n>On Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Bio/Chem Gold, our framework achieves 48.3% accuracy.<n>Results on SuperGPQA and TRQA confirm robustness across domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T14:05:55Z) - Fact or Facsimile? Evaluating the Factual Robustness of Modern Retrievers [34.31192184496381]
Dense retrievers and rerankers are central to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines.<n>We evaluate how much factual competence these components inherit or lose from large language models (LLMs) they are based on.<n>For every embedding model, cosine-similarity scores between queries and correct completions are significantly higher than those for incorrect ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-28T04:13:51Z) - Unblocking Fine-Grained Evaluation of Detailed Captions: An Explaining AutoRater and Critic-and-Revise Pipeline [58.832237984587664]
We develop VNLI-Critique, a model for automated sentence-level factuality classification and critique generation.<n>We highlight three key applications: (1) VNLI-Critique demonstrates robust generalization, validated by state-of-the-art performance on the M-HalDetect benchmark; (2) The VNLI-Critique driven AutoRater for DOCCI-Critique provides reliable VLM rankings, showing excellent alignment with human factuality judgments; and (3) An innovative Critic-and-Revise pipeline, achieves substantial improvements in caption factuality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T10:57:26Z) - Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Conflicting Evidence [57.66282463340297]
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly employing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to improve the factuality of their responses.<n>In practice, these systems often need to handle ambiguous user queries and potentially conflicting information from multiple sources.<n>We propose RAMDocs (Retrieval with Ambiguity and Misinformation in Documents), a new dataset that simulates complex and realistic scenarios for conflicting evidence for a user query.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-17T16:46:11Z) - MES-RAG: Bringing Multi-modal, Entity-Storage, and Secure Enhancements to RAG [65.0423152595537]
We propose MES-RAG, which enhances entity-specific query handling and provides accurate, secure, and consistent responses.<n>MES-RAG introduces proactive security measures that ensure system integrity by applying protections prior to data access.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that MES-RAG significantly improves both accuracy and recall, highlighting its effectiveness in advancing the security and utility of question-answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T08:09:42Z) - Worse than Zero-shot? A Fact-Checking Dataset for Evaluating the Robustness of RAG Against Misleading Retrievals [5.605770511387228]
RAGuard is the first benchmark to evaluate the robustness of RAG systems against misleading retrievals.<n>Unlike prior benchmarks that rely on synthetic noise, our fact-checking dataset captures naturally occurring misinformation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-22T05:50:15Z) - Enhancing Large Language Models with Domain-specific Retrieval Augment Generation: A Case Study on Long-form Consumer Health Question Answering in Ophthalmology [34.82874325860935]
Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine may generate responses lacking supporting evidence based on hallucinated evidence.
We developed a RAG pipeline with 70,000 ophthalmology-specific documents that retrieve relevant documents to augment LLMs during inference time.
We evaluated the responses including over 500 references of LLMs with and without RAG on 100 questions with 10 healthcare professionals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-20T21:06:00Z) - FactCHD: Benchmarking Fact-Conflicting Hallucination Detection [64.4610684475899]
FactCHD is a benchmark designed for the detection of fact-conflicting hallucinations from LLMs.
FactCHD features a diverse dataset that spans various factuality patterns, including vanilla, multi-hop, comparison, and set operation.
We introduce Truth-Triangulator that synthesizes reflective considerations by tool-enhanced ChatGPT and LoRA-tuning based on Llama2.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-18T16:27:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.