Physical Probability in the Everett Interpretation and Bell Inequalities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00575v1
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 18:07:30 GMT
- Title: Physical Probability in the Everett Interpretation and Bell Inequalities
- Authors: Simon Saunders,
- Abstract summary: I define a notion of local causality LOC closely modelled on the Bell principle.<n>I show it is consistent with LOC.<n>I conclude that probability in the Everett interpretation involves no action at a distance, but that the observed violations of Bell inequalities is powerful evidence for many worlds.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: I define a notion of local causality LOC closely modelled on the Bell principle, construed as the condition that single case probabilities cannot be modified by actions at spacelike separation. The new principle, like that of Bell, forces Bell inequalities, but with two loopholes: one is retrocausation, known to Bell, but the other is nonuniqueness of remote outcomes, a loophole only for LOC, not for the Bell principle. I also set out a theory of physical probability, applicable to the Everett interpretation, in agreement with the Born rule, and therefore violating Bell inequalities. I show it is consistent with LOC. Surprisingly, both loopholes are exploited. I conclude not only that probability in the Everett interpretation involves no action at a distance, but that the observed violations of Bell inequalities is powerful evidence for many worlds.
Related papers
- Physical probability in the Everett interpretation and Bell inequalities [0.0]
I define a notion of locality LOC, closely modelled on the Bell principle of Local Causality.<n>I show it is consistent with LOC.<n>I conclude that physical probability in the Everett interpretation involves no action at a distance, but that the observed violation of Bell inequalities is powerful evidence for many worlds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-17T20:11:50Z) - Simple explanation of apparent Bell nonlocality of unentangled photons [0.0]
Wang et al. recently reported an experiment that they interpret as demonstrating a violation of Bell's inequality using unentangled photons.<n>We argue that the reported violation does not demonstrate nonlocality without entanglement, but rather reflects a misinterpretation of otherwise valid and interesting multiphoton interference effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-03T08:27:20Z) - What are the bearers of hidden states? On an important ambiguity in the formulation of Bell's theorem [0.0]
I argue that straightforward attempts to establish Bell's conclusion fail in both approaches.<n>I propose a new way of establishing Bell's conclusion that combines intuitions underlying several previous approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-29T09:51:16Z) - Time series and the meaning of quantum non-locality [55.2480439325792]
The derivation of Bell's inequalities gives precise meaning to the idea of quantum non-locality.
It also makes evident why using it for faster than light signaling is impossible.
It is demonstrated that series of outcomes, even if they violate Bell's inequalities, can be always embedded in a set of factual and counter-factual data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T14:49:47Z) - Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed.
In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z) - The distinctive symmetry of Bell states [65.268245109828]
The Bell's basis is composed of four maximally entangled states of two qubits.
The aim of this paper is to find out the symmetries that determine a Bell state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-14T17:02:41Z) - Is a spectrograph of hidden variables possible? [91.3755431537592]
"Spectrograph's Realism", and "Locality", are proven to be different, and both necessary, hypotheses to derive Bell's inequalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T13:59:08Z) - An Appropriate Probability Model for the Bell Experiment [0.0]
The Bell inequality constrains the outcomes of measurements on pairs of distant entangled particles.
The Bell contradiction states that the Bell inequality is inconsistent with the calculated outcomes of these quantum experiments.
This paper proposes an appropriate probability model for the Bell experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-10T11:08:23Z) - Quantum Bell inequalities from Information Causality -- tight for
Macroscopic Locality [0.34771439623170125]
In a Bell test, the set of observed probability distributions complying with the principle of local realism is fully characterized by Bell inequalities.
We present a family of inequalities, which approximate the set of quantum correlations in Bell scenarios where the number of settings or outcomes can be arbitrary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-08T19:36:13Z) - Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics'
predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic.
"Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected.
"Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z) - Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it.
We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.