On the Tension Between Optimality and Adversarial Robustness in Policy Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01228v1
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 03:14:17 GMT
- Title: On the Tension Between Optimality and Adversarial Robustness in Policy Optimization
- Authors: Haoran Li, Jiayu Lv, Congying Han, Zicheng Zhang, Anqi Li, Yan Liu, Tiande Guo, Nan Jiang,
- Abstract summary: This paper identifies a key gap between theory and practice by comparing standard policy optimization (SPO) and adversarially robust policy optimization (ARPO)<n>We develop the BARPO, a bilevel framework unifying SPO and ARPO by modulating adversary strength, thereby facilitating navigability while preserving global optima.
- Score: 40.62793922201162
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Achieving optimality and adversarial robustness in deep reinforcement learning has long been regarded as conflicting goals. Nonetheless, recent theoretical insights presented in CAR suggest a potential alignment, raising the important question of how to realize this in practice. This paper first identifies a key gap between theory and practice by comparing standard policy optimization (SPO) and adversarially robust policy optimization (ARPO). Although they share theoretical consistency, a fundamental tension between robustness and optimality arises in practical policy gradient methods. SPO tends toward convergence to vulnerable first-order stationary policies (FOSPs) with strong natural performance, whereas ARPO typically favors more robust FOSPs at the expense of reduced returns. Furthermore, we attribute this tradeoff to the reshaping effect of the strongest adversary in ARPO, which significantly complicates the global landscape by inducing deceptive sticky FOSPs. This improves robustness but makes navigation more challenging. To alleviate this, we develop the BARPO, a bilevel framework unifying SPO and ARPO by modulating adversary strength, thereby facilitating navigability while preserving global optima. Extensive empirical results demonstrate that BARPO consistently outperforms vanilla ARPO, providing a practical approach to reconcile theoretical and empirical performance.
Related papers
- Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z) - Outcome-Grounded Advantage Reshaping for Fine-Grained Credit Assignment in Mathematical Reasoning [60.00161035836637]
Group Relative Policy Optimization has emerged as a promising critic-free reinforcement learning paradigm for reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce Outcome-grounded Advantage Reshaping (OAR), a fine-grained credit assignment mechanism that redistributes advantages based on how much each token influences the model's final answer.<n>OAR-G achieves comparable gains with negligible computational overhead, both significantly outperforming a strong GRPO baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T10:48:02Z) - DaGRPO: Rectifying Gradient Conflict in Reasoning via Distinctiveness-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization [20.66452395111739]
We propose Distinctiveness-aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (DaGRPO)<n>DaGRPO incorporates two core mechanisms: (1) Sequence-level Gradient Rectification, which utilizes fine-grained scoring to dynamically mask sample pairs with low distinctiveness; and (2) Off-policy Data Augmentation, which introduces high-quality anchors to recover training signals for challenging tasks.<n>In-depth analysis confirms that DaGRPO effectively mitigates gradient explosion and accelerates the emergence of long-chain reasoning capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-06T07:51:36Z) - Policy Regularized Distributionally Robust Markov Decision Processes with Linear Function Approximation [10.35045003737115]
Decision-making under distribution shift is a central challenge in reinforcement learning (RL), where training and deployment environments differ.<n>We propose DR-RPO, a model-free online policy optimization method that learns robust policies with sublinear regret.<n>We show that DR-RPO can achieve suboptimality bounds and sample efficiency in robust RL, matching the performance of value-based approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T02:56:58Z) - ACPO: Adaptive Curriculum Policy Optimization for Aligning Vision-Language Models in Complex Reasoning [17.928214942495412]
ACPO employs a dynamic curriculum that orchestrates a principled transition from a stable, near on-policy exploration phase to an efficient, off-policy exploitation phase.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on a suite of challenging multimodal reasoning benchmarks, including MathVista, LogicVista, and MMMU-Pro.<n>Results demonstrate that ACPO consistently outperforms strong baselines such as DAPO and PAPO, achieving state-of-the-art performance, accelerated convergence, and superior training stability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T09:11:27Z) - Rectified Robust Policy Optimization for Model-Uncertain Constrained Reinforcement Learning without Strong Duality [53.525547349715595]
We propose a novel primal-only algorithm called Rectified Robust Policy Optimization (RRPO)<n>RRPO operates directly on the primal problem without relying on dual formulations.<n>We show convergence to an approximately optimal feasible policy with complexity matching the best-known lower bound.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-24T16:59:38Z) - On-Policy RL with Optimal Reward Baseline [109.47676554514193]
On-Policy RL with Optimal reward baseline (OPO) is a novel and simplified reinforcement learning algorithm.<n>OPO emphasizes the importance of exact on-policy training, which empirically stabilizes the training process and enhances exploration.<n>Results demonstrate OPO's superior performance and training stability without additional models or regularization terms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T15:58:04Z) - DisCO: Reinforcing Large Reasoning Models with Discriminative Constrained Optimization [50.91849555841057]
Group Relative Policy Optimization is a reinforcement learning method for large reasoning models (LRMs)<n>We introduce a new Discriminative Constrained Optimization framework for reinforcing LRMs, grounded in the principle of discriminative learning.<n>DisCO significantly outperforms GRPO and its improved variants such as DAPO, achieving average gains of 7% over GRPO and 6% over DAPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-18T11:08:32Z) - Training Large Language Models to Reason via EM Policy Gradient [0.27195102129094995]
We introduce an off-policy reinforcement learning algorithm, EM Policy Gradient, to enhance LLM reasoning.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness of EM Policy Gradient on the GSM8K and MATH (HARD) datasets.<n>Models fine-tuned with our method exhibit cognitive behaviors, such as sub-problem decomposition, self-verification, and backtracking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-24T01:31:05Z) - Simple Policy Optimization [15.66748378216631]
Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) is known for ensuring monotonic policy improvement through conservative updates within a trust region.<n>Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) addresses this by simplifying TRPO's approach using ratio clipping, improving efficiency but sacrificing some theoretical robustness.<n>This raises a natural question: Can we combine the strengths of both methods?<n>In this paper, we introduce Simple Policy Optimization (SPO), a novel unconstrained first-order algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T10:17:54Z) - Monotonic Improvement Guarantees under Non-stationarity for
Decentralized PPO [66.5384483339413]
We present a new monotonic improvement guarantee for optimizing decentralized policies in cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL)
We show that a trust region constraint can be effectively enforced in a principled way by bounding independent ratios based on the number of agents in training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-31T20:39:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.