LLM CHESS: Benchmarking Reasoning and Instruction-Following in LLMs through Chess

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01992v1
• Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 18:51:08 GMT
• Title: LLM CHESS: Benchmarking Reasoning and Instruction-Following in LLMs through Chess
• Authors: Sai Kolasani, Maxim Saplin, Nicholas Crispino, Kyle Montgomery, Jared Quincy Davis, Matei Zaharia, Chi Wang, Chenguang Wang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce LLM CHESS, an evaluation framework designed to probe the generalization of reasoning and instruction-following abilities in large language models (LLMs)<n>We rank over 50 open and closed source models by playing against a random opponent using a range of behavioral metrics, including move quality, move legality, hallucinated actions, and game duration.<n>For a subset of top reasoning models, we derive an Elo estimate by playing against a chess engine with variably configured skill, which allows for comparisons between models in an easily understandable way.
• Score: 30.797553771114746
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce LLM CHESS, an evaluation framework designed to probe the generalization of reasoning and instruction-following abilities in large language models (LLMs) through extended agentic interaction in the domain of chess. We rank over 50 open and closed source models by playing against a random opponent using a range of behavioral metrics, including win and loss rates, move quality, move legality, hallucinated actions, and game duration. For a subset of top reasoning models, we derive an Elo estimate by playing against a chess engine with variably configured skill, which allows for comparisons between models in an easily understandable way. Despite the simplicity of the instruction-following task and the weakness of the opponent, many state-of-the-art models struggle to complete games or achieve consistent wins. Similar to other benchmarks on complex reasoning tasks, our experiments reveal a clear separation between reasoning and non-reasoning models. However, unlike existing static benchmarks, the stochastic and dynamic nature of LLM CHESS uniquely reduces overfitting and memorization while preventing benchmark saturation, proving difficult even for top reasoning models. To support future work on evaluating reasoning and instruction-following in LLMs, we release our experimental framework, a public leaderboard, and a dataset of associated games.

Related papers

• How Far Are LLMs from Professional Poker Players? Revisiting Game-Theoretic Reasoning with Agentic Tool Use [52.394999779049606]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in high-stakes domains.<n>LLMs fail to compete against traditional algorithms.<n>We propose ToolPoker, a tool-integrated reasoning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T05:45:25Z)
• Evaluating from Benign to Dynamic Adversarial: A Squid Game for Large Language Models [57.33350664910483]
  We introduce Squid Game, a dynamic and adversarial evaluation environment with resource-constrained and asymmetric information settings.<n>We evaluate over 50 LLMs on Squid Game, presenting the largest behavioral evaluation study of general LLMs on dynamic adversarial scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T06:06:29Z)
• LM Fight Arena: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models via Game Competition [104.81487689011341]
  We introduce LM Fight Arena, a novel framework that evaluates large multimodal models in Mortal Kombat II.<n>Unlike static evaluations, LM Fight Arena provides a fully automated, reproducible, and objective assessment of an LMM's strategic reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T02:19:21Z)
• Who is a Better Player: LLM against LLM [53.46608216197315]
  We propose an adversarial benchmarking framework to assess the comprehensive performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) through board games competition.<n>We introduce Qi Town, a specialized evaluation platform that supports 5 widely played games and involves 20 LLM-driven players.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T06:41:47Z)
• CounterBench: A Benchmark for Counterfactuals Reasoning in Large Language Models [5.409370027524351]
  We evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in counterfactual reasoning.<n>We introduce a new benchmark dataset, CounterBench, comprising 1K counterfactual reasoning questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T06:19:37Z)
• GAMEBoT: Transparent Assessment of LLM Reasoning in Games [54.49589494014147]
  GAMEBoT is a gaming arena designed for rigorous assessment of Large Language Models.<n>We benchmark 17 prominent LLMs across eight games, encompassing various strategic abilities and game characteristics.<n>Our results suggest that GAMEBoT presents a significant challenge, even when LLMs are provided with detailed CoT prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T08:32:53Z)
• Evaluating Creativity and Deception in Large Language Models: A Simulation Framework for Multi-Agent Balderdash [6.65572931991284]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in complex tasks and interactive environments. This paper introduces a simulation framework utilizing the game Balderdash to evaluate both the creativity and logical reasoning of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T18:42:48Z)
• TMGBench: A Systematic Game Benchmark for Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Abilities of LLMs [45.12542636218608]
  We propose TMGBench, characterized by comprehensive game type coverage, diverse scenarios and flexible game organization.<n>Specifically, we incorporate all 144 game types summarized by the Robinson-Goforth topology of 2x2 games, constructed as classic games in our benchmark.<n>To provide a sustainable evaluation framework adaptable to increasingly powerful LLMs, we treat the aforementioned games as atomic units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T13:15:34Z)
• LogicGame: Benchmarking Rule-Based Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models [87.49676980090555]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated notable capabilities across various tasks, showcasing complex problem-solving abilities. We introduce LogicGame, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the comprehensive rule understanding, execution, and planning capabilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T13:16:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.