Young children's anthropomorphism of an AI chatbot: Brain activation and the role of parent co-presence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02179v2
• Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 17:28:31 GMT
• Title: Young children's anthropomorphism of an AI chatbot: Brain activation and the role of parent co-presence
• Authors: Pilyoung Kim, Jenna H. Chin, Yun Xie, Nolan Brady, Tom Yeh, Sujin Yang,
• Abstract summary: We examined how children's attributions related to their behavior and prefrontal activation during storytelling sessions.<n>Findings suggest that stronger perceptive anthropomorphism can be associated with greater brain activation related to interpreting the AI's mental states.
• Score: 3.6574853953994055
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots powered by a large language model (LLM) are entering young children's learning and play, yet little is known about how young children construe these agents or how such construals relate to engagement. We examined anthropomorphism of a social AI chatbot during collaborative storytelling and asked how children's attributions related to their behavior and prefrontal activation. Children at ages 5-6 (N = 23) completed three storytelling sessions: interacting with (1) an AI chatbot only, (2) a parent only, and (3) the AI and a parent together. After the sessions, children completed an interview assessing anthropomorphism toward both the AI chatbot and the parent. Behavioral engagement was indexed by the conversational turn count (CTC) ratio, and concurrent fNIRS measured oxygenated hemoglobin in bilateral vmPFC and dmPFC regions. Children reported higher anthropomorphism for parents than for the AI chatbot overall, although AI ratings were relatively high for perceptive abilities and epistemic states. Anthropomorphism was not associated with CTC. In the right dmPFC, higher perceptive scores were associated with greater activation during the AI-only condition and with lower activation during the AI+Parent condition. Exploratory analyses indicated that higher dmPFC activation during the AI-only condition correlated with higher end-of-session "scared" mood ratings. Findings suggest that stronger perceptive anthropomorphism can be associated with greater brain activation related to interpreting the AI's mental states, whereas parent co-presence may help some children interpret and regulate novel AI interactions. These results may have design implications for encouraging parent-AI co-use in early childhood.

Related papers

• Understanding Parents' Desires in Moderating Children's Interactions with GenAI Chatbots through LLM-Generated Probes [23.371075498013457]
  This paper studies how parents want to moderate children's interactions with Generative AI chatbots.<n>Our findings reveal three key insights: (1) parents express concern about interactions that current GenAI parental controls neglect; (2) parents want fine-grained transparency and moderation at the conversation level; and (3) parents need personalized controls that adapt to their desired strategies and children's ages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T05:00:14Z)
• ChatGPT-5 in Secondary Education: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Student Attitudes, AI Anxiety, and Hallucination-Aware Use [0.0]
  Students used ChatGPT-5 during an eight-hour intervention in the course "Technology"<n>Students engaged in information seeking, CV generation, document and video summarization, image generation, quiz creation, and age-appropriate explanations.<n>After encountering hallucinations, many students reported restricting AI use to domains where they already possessed knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T19:28:48Z)
• Cooperation Through Indirect Reciprocity in Child-Robot Interactions [81.62347137438248]
  We investigate whether indirect reciprocity can be transposed to children-robot interactions.<n>We find that IR extends to children and robots solving coordination dilemmas.<n>We observe that cooperating through multi-armed bandit algorithms is highly dependent on the strategies revealed by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T07:08:32Z)
• A funny companion: Distinct neural responses to perceived AI- versus human-generated humor [2.859021383061256]
  This study used electroencephalography (EEG) to compare how people process humor from AI versus human sources.<n>Results: AI humor elicited a smaller N400 effect, suggesting reduced cognitive effort during the processing of incongruity.<n>These findings indicate that the brain responds to AI humor with surprisingly positive and intense reactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-13T15:05:57Z)
• Children's Mental Models of AI Reasoning: Implications for AI Literacy Education [8.996593596034506]
  We identify three models of AI reasoning: Deductive, Inductive, and Inherent.<n>Our findings reveal that younger children (grades 3-5) often attribute AI's reasoning to inherent intelligence, while older children (grades 6-8) recognize AI as a pattern recognizer.<n>We highlight three tensions that surfaced in children's understanding of AI reasoning and conclude with implications for scaffolding AI curricula and designing explainable AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T21:20:12Z)
• Almost AI, Almost Human: The Challenge of Detecting AI-Polished Writing [55.2480439325792]
  This study systematically evaluations twelve state-of-the-art AI-text detectors using our AI-Polished-Text Evaluation dataset.<n>Our findings reveal that detectors frequently flag even minimally polished text as AI-generated, struggle to differentiate between degrees of AI involvement, and exhibit biases against older and smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T18:45:37Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: Examining Human Judgment Against Text Labeled as AI Generated [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content.<n>We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• Children's Mental Models of Generative Visual and Text Based AI Models [0.027961972519572442]
  Children ages 5-12 perceive, understand, and use generative AI models such as a text-based LLMs ChatGPT and a visual-based model DALL-E. We found that children generally have a very positive outlook towards AI and are excited about the ways AI may benefit and aid them in their everyday lives. We hope that these findings will shine a light on children's mental models of AI and provide insight for how to design the best possible tools for children who will inevitably be using AI in their lifetimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T06:18:00Z)
• Exploring Parent's Needs for Children-Centered AI to Support Preschoolers' Interactive Storytelling and Reading Activities [52.828843153565984]
  AI-based storytelling and reading technologies are becoming increasingly ubiquitous in preschoolers' lives. This paper investigates how they function in practical storytelling and reading scenarios and, how parents, the most critical stakeholders, experience and perceive them. Our findings suggest that even though AI-based storytelling and reading technologies provide more immersive and engaging interaction, they still cannot meet parents' expectations due to a series of interactive and algorithmic challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:55:40Z)
• Bootstrapping Developmental AIs: From Simple Competences to Intelligent Human-Compatible AIs [0.0]
  The mainstream AIs approaches are the generative and deep learning approaches with large language models (LLMs) and the manually constructed symbolic approach. This position paper lays out the prospects, gaps, and challenges for extending the practice of developmental AIs to create resilient, intelligent, and human-compatible AIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T21:14:21Z)
• Can Machines Imitate Humans? Integrative Turing-like tests for Language and Vision Demonstrate a Narrowing Gap [56.611702960809644]
  We benchmark AI's ability to imitate humans in three language tasks and three vision tasks.<n>Next, we conducted 72,191 Turing-like tests with 1,916 human judges and 10 AI judges.<n>Imitation ability showed minimal correlation with conventional AI performance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T16:16:52Z)
• StoryBuddy: A Human-AI Collaborative Chatbot for Parent-Child Interactive Storytelling with Flexible Parental Involvement [61.47157418485633]
  We developed StoryBuddy, an AI-enabled system for parents to create interactive storytelling experiences. A user study validated StoryBuddy's usability and suggested design insights for future parent-AI collaboration systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-13T04:53:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.